Biggest changeExcludes all franchise locations. 17 The following table summarizes the geographic diversity of our Portfolio by state, ranked by ABR, as of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands, expect for PSF amounts): State Number of Properties GLA Percent Billed Percent Leased ABR ABR PSF Percent of Number of Properties Percent of GLA Percent of ABR 1 Florida 48 8,473,446 92.1 % 95.9 % $ 141,138 $ 17.88 13.2 % 13.2 % 14.0 % 2 Texas 48 7,409,851 88.3 % 95.2 % 120,470 17.88 13.2 % 11.6 % 11.9 % 3 California 28 5,187,376 92.5 % 98.2 % 116,966 24.55 7.6 % 8.1 % 11.7 % 4 Pennsylvania 24 4,336,727 93.5 % 96.6 % 71,843 21.00 6.5 % 6.7 % 7.2 % 5 New York 27 3,435,843 93.7 % 95.0 % 71,391 22.37 7.4 % 5.4 % 7.1 % 6 Illinois 16 3,942,403 85.1 % 90.6 % 55,458 15.95 4.4 % 6.2 % 5.5 % 7 Georgia 26 3,598,171 93.3 % 94.9 % 48,161 14.62 7.2 % 5.6 % 4.8 % 8 New Jersey 16 2,821,623 89.3 % 93.6 % 47,804 19.22 4.4 % 4.4 % 4.7 % 9 North Carolina 14 3,164,938 93.4 % 95.0 % 43,445 15.23 3.9 % 4.9 % 4.3 % 10 Michigan 15 2,832,546 94.9 % 95.6 % 40,072 15.49 4.1 % 4.4 % 4.0 % 11 Ohio 13 2,666,416 88.7 % 92.0 % 32,993 15.89 3.6 % 4.2 % 3.3 % 12 Connecticut 10 1,787,723 91.7 % 94.8 % 26,667 16.64 2.8 % 2.8 % 2.6 % 13 Tennessee 7 1,790,636 92.4 % 96.6 % 24,637 14.56 1.9 % 2.8 % 2.4 % 14 Massachusetts 11 1,644,590 92.5 % 96.6 % 24,382 17.12 3.0 % 2.6 % 2.4 % 15 Colorado 7 1,578,087 91.2 % 97.2 % 24,203 16.73 1.9 % 2.5 % 2.4 % 16 Kentucky 6 1,545,582 96.3 % 96.8 % 18,686 13.96 1.7 % 2.4 % 1.8 % 17 South Carolina 8 1,210,244 93.3 % 94.6 % 18,510 16.39 2.2 % 1.9 % 1.8 % 18 Minnesota 9 1,269,747 85.7 % 95.1 % 18,232 16.43 2.5 % 2.0 % 1.8 % 19 Indiana 4 990,824 95.4 % 96.0 % 12,215 12.98 1.1 % 1.5 % 1.2 % 20 Virginia 5 742,449 94.8 % 99.5 % 10,582 15.60 1.4 % 1.2 % 1.0 % 21 New Hampshire 5 672,254 95.8 % 98.5 % 10,271 16.16 1.4 % 1.1 % 1.0 % 22 Wisconsin 3 520,769 96.1 % 96.2 % 6,453 12.89 0.8 % 0.8 % 0.6 % 23 Maryland 2 371,986 92.0 % 92.0 % 5,975 18.07 0.6 % 0.6 % 0.6 % 24 Missouri 4 495,523 90.5 % 93.6 % 4,937 10.72 1.1 % 0.8 % 0.5 % 25 Kansas 2 376,599 92.5 % 94.4 % 3,748 13.64 0.6 % 0.6 % 0.4 % 26 Alabama 1 398,701 73.1 % 73.1 % 3,355 11.87 0.3 % 0.6 % 0.3 % 27 Arizona 1 165,350 74.5 % 100.0 % 2,267 13.71 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 28 Maine 1 287,459 91.2 % 100.0 % 2,265 19.03 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 29 Vermont 1 223,314 94.8 % 94.8 % 2,138 10.10 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 30 West Virginia 1 75,344 54.1 % 100.0 % 884 11.73 0.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % TOTAL 363 64,016,521 91.4 % 95.2 % $ 1,010,148 $ 17.66 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % The following table summarizes certain information for our Portfolio by unit size, as of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands, expect for PSF amounts): Number of Units GLA Percent of GLA Percent Billed Percent Leased ABR Percent of ABR ABR PSF ≥ 35,000 SF 397 22,480,509 35.1 % 94.1 % 98.2 % $ 223,286 22.1 % $ 11.57 20,000 – 34,999 SF 482 12,544,682 19.6 % 91.7 % 95.4 % 150,764 15.0 % 12.72 10,000 – 19,999 SF 617 8,444,961 13.2 % 93.3 % 97.0 % 130,440 12.9 % 16.33 5,000 – 9,999 SF 1,096 7,573,997 11.8 % 87.9 % 91.9 % 147,786 14.7 % 22.06 6,018 12,972,372 20.3 % 87.0 % 90.7 % 357,872 35.3 % 31.50 TOTAL 8,610 64,016,521 100.0 % 91.4 % 95.2 % $ 1,010,148 100.0 % $ 17.66 TOTAL ≥ 10,000 SF 1,496 43,470,152 67.9 % 93.2 % 97.2 % $ 504,490 50.0 % $ 12.89 TOTAL 7,114 20,546,369 32.1 % 87.4 % 91.1 % 505,658 50.0 % 28.00 18 The following table summarizes lease expirations for leases in place within our Portfolio for each of the next 10 calendar years and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options and including the GLA of lessee-owned leasehold improvements, as of December 31, 2024: Number of Leases Leased GLA % of Leased GLA % of In-Place ABR In-Place ABR PSF ABR PSF at Expiration M-M 193 600,570 1.0 % 1.1 % $ 18.24 $ 18.24 2025 909 5,435,002 8.9 % 7.5 % 14.01 13.96 2026 1,034 7,118,472 11.7 % 11.2 % 15.91 16.04 2027 1,103 8,344,141 13.7 % 13.1 % 15.89 16.22 2028 991 6,869,521 11.3 % 11.8 % 17.31 17.88 2029 966 8,525,224 14.0 % 13.2 % 15.64 16.22 2030 638 6,232,489 10.2 % 9.2 % 14.94 16.38 2031 346 2,779,419 4.6 % 4.7 % 17.21 19.23 2032 362 2,656,828 4.4 % 4.8 % 18.31 20.53 2033 411 3,152,905 5.2 % 6.0 % 18.78 21.34 2034 443 3,693,053 6.0 % 6.7 % 18.35 21.10 2035+ 502 5,551,273 9.0 % 10.7 % 19.54 23.34 More specific information with respect to each of our properties is set forth in Exhibit 99.1, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Biggest changeExcludes all franchise locations. 18 The following table summarizes the geographic diversity of our Portfolio by state, ranked by ABR, as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands, expect for PSF amounts): State Number of Properties GLA Percent Billed Percent Leased ABR ABR PSF Percent of Number of Properties Percent of GLA Percent of ABR 1 Florida 48 8,471,338 92.6 % 95.8 % $ 147,063 $ 18.66 13.8 % 13.5 % 14.0 % 2 Texas 45 7,401,326 89.7 % 95.1 % 134,740 19.86 12.9 % 11.8 % 12.8 % 3 California 29 5,659,663 92.6 % 96.0 % 130,175 25.73 8.4 % 9.0 % 12.4 % 4 New York 27 3,442,455 88.4 % 94.3 % 75,798 23.96 7.8 % 5.4 % 7.3 % 5 Pennsylvania 22 4,211,974 95.2 % 98.1 % 74,637 22.21 6.3 % 6.7 % 7.2 % 6 Illinois 15 3,824,753 88.3 % 91.9 % 56,984 16.66 4.3 % 6.1 % 5.4 % 7 New Jersey 16 2,789,796 91.6 % 93.8 % 48,117 19.54 4.6 % 4.5 % 4.6 % 8 Georgia 22 3,158,384 94.3 % 96.3 % 45,385 15.51 6.3 % 5.0 % 4.3 % 9 North Carolina 13 3,136,050 94.0 % 96.0 % 44,818 15.58 3.7 % 5.0 % 4.3 % 10 Michigan 14 2,738,511 93.4 % 96.3 % 40,174 16.01 4.0 % 4.4 % 3.8 % 11 Ohio 13 2,489,723 87.6 % 90.8 % 32,023 17.00 3.7 % 4.0 % 3.0 % 12 Colorado 8 1,752,123 87.9 % 95.3 % 27,578 17.65 2.3 % 2.8 % 2.6 % 13 Connecticut 10 1,789,531 87.5 % 91.7 % 27,007 16.89 2.9 % 2.9 % 2.6 % 14 Massachusetts 11 1,657,165 94.8 % 96.0 % 25,379 17.76 3.2 % 2.6 % 2.4 % 15 Tennessee 6 1,539,895 94.8 % 96.8 % 23,028 15.83 1.7 % 2.5 % 2.2 % 16 South Carolina 8 1,213,375 92.9 % 97.7 % 19,852 16.97 2.3 % 1.9 % 1.9 % 17 Kentucky 6 1,543,082 96.2 % 99.1 % 19,663 14.33 1.7 % 2.5 % 1.9 % 18 Minnesota 9 1,269,747 93.0 % 94.8 % 18,880 17.06 2.6 % 2.0 % 1.8 % 19 Indiana 4 985,327 92.3 % 94.0 % 12,447 13.62 1.1 % 1.6 % 1.2 % 20 Virginia 5 746,349 91.7 % 93.2 % 10,282 16.19 1.4 % 1.2 % 1.0 % 21 New Hampshire 4 581,130 86.1 % 91.9 % 9,713 19.16 1.1 % 0.9 % 0.9 % 22 Wisconsin 3 520,769 93.6 % 94.0 % 6,473 13.24 0.9 % 0.8 % 0.6 % 23 Maryland 2 371,977 78.3 % 83.5 % 5,633 18.35 0.6 % 0.6 % 0.5 % 24 Missouri 3 423,933 87.9 % 88.6 % 4,291 11.53 0.9 % 0.7 % 0.4 % 25 Arizona 1 165,350 100.0 % 100.0 % 2,408 14.56 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 26 Maine 1 287,459 83.9 % 100.0 % 2,362 19.84 0.3 % 0.5 % 0.2 % 27 Vermont 1 223,314 93.5 % 93.5 % 2,088 10.00 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.2 % 28 Kansas 1 214,898 93.4 % 94.4 % 2,076 16.97 0.3 % 0.3 % 0.2 % 29 West Virginia 1 75,344 100.0 % 100.0 % 884 11.73 0.3 % 0.1 % 0.1 % TOTAL 348 62,684,741 91.6 % 95.1 % $ 1,049,958 $ 18.77 100.0 % 100.0 % 100.0 % The following table summarizes certain information for our Portfolio by unit size, as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands, expect for PSF amounts): Number of Units GLA Percent of GLA Percent Billed Percent Leased ABR Percent of ABR ABR PSF ≥ 35,000 SF 374 21,310,677 34.0 % 95.7 % 97.6 % $ 217,205 20.7 % $ 11.98 20,000 – 34,999 SF 476 12,389,437 19.8 % 90.8 % 96.1 % 156,909 14.9 % 13.28 10,000 – 19,999 SF 623 8,526,181 13.6 % 90.9 % 94.7 % 135,944 13.0 % 17.27 5,000 – 9,999 SF 1,087 7,502,918 12.0 % 87.8 % 92.6 % 156,904 14.9 % 23.64 5,992 12,955,528 20.6 % 88.4 % 91.9 % 382,996 36.5 % 33.35 TOTAL 8,552 62,684,741 100.0 % 91.6 % 95.1 % $ 1,049,958 100.0 % $ 18.77 TOTAL ≥ 10,000 SF 1,473 42,226,295 67.4 % 93.3 % 96.6 % $ 510,058 48.6 % $ 13.49 TOTAL 7,079 20,458,446 32.6 % 88.2 % 92.2 % 539,900 51.4 % 29.79 19 The following table summarizes lease expirations for leases in place within our Portfolio for each of the next 10 calendar years and thereafter, assuming no exercise of renewal options and including the GLA of lessee-owned leasehold improvements, as of December 31, 2025: Number of Leases Leased GLA % of Leased GLA % of In-Place ABR In-Place ABR PSF ABR PSF at Expiration M-M 176 685,497 1.1 % 1.0 % $ 15.28 $ 15.28 2026 851 4,830,714 8.1 % 6.9 % 14.97 14.99 2027 1,098 8,005,429 13.4 % 12.5 % 16.36 16.53 2028 1,096 6,909,399 11.6 % 12.0 % 18.21 18.66 2029 970 7,964,526 13.4 % 12.6 % 16.62 17.16 2030 934 7,767,334 13.0 % 12.4 % 16.75 17.42 2031 593 5,356,681 9.0 % 8.2 % 16.13 17.78 2032 400 2,998,006 5.0 % 5.3 % 18.52 20.58 2033 435 3,006,235 5.0 % 5.7 % 19.85 22.50 2034 434 3,604,255 6.0 % 6.3 % 18.32 20.94 2035 409 3,246,949 5.5 % 6.6 % 21.52 25.00 2036+ 515 5,252,858 8.9 % 10.5 % 21.01 25.48 More specific information with respect to each of our properties is set forth in Exhibit 99.1, which is incorporated herein by reference.
BPG’s charter provides that, to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law, each of BPG’s non-employee directors, and any of their affiliates, may: • acquire, hold, and dispose of shares of BPG’s stock or OP Units for his or her own account or for the account of others, and exercise all of the rights of a stockholder of Brixmor Property Group Inc. or a limited partner of our Operating Partnership, to the same extent and in the same manner as if he, she, or they were not BPG’s director or stockholder; and • in his, her, or their personal capacity or in his, her, or their capacity as a director, officer, trustee, stockholder, partner, member, equity owner, manager, advisor, or employee of any other person, have business interests and engage, directly or indirectly, in business activities that are similar to ours or compete with us, that involve a business opportunity that we could seize and develop or that include the acquisition, syndication, holding, management, development, operation, or disposition of interests in mortgages, real property, or persons engaged in the real estate business.
BPG’s charter provides that, to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law, each of BPG’s non-employee directors, and any of their affiliates, may: • acquire, hold, and dispose of shares of BPG’s stock or OP Units for his or her own account or for the account of others, and exercise all of the rights of a stockholder of Brixmor Property Group Inc. or a limited partner of our Operating Partnership, to the same extent and in the same manner as if he, she, or they were not BPG’s director or stockholder; and 13 • in his, her, or their personal capacity or in his, her, or their capacity as a director, officer, trustee, stockholder, partner, member, equity owner, manager, advisor, or employee of any other person, have business interests and engage, directly or indirectly, in business activities that are similar to ours or compete with us, that involve a business opportunity that we could seize and develop or that include the acquisition, syndication, holding, management, development, operation, or disposition of interests in mortgages, real property, or persons engaged in the real estate business.
In addition to the risks associated with real estate investments in general, as described elsewhere, the risks associated with repositioning and redevelopment projects include: (1) delays or failures in obtaining necessary zoning, occupancy, land use, and other governmental permits; 7 (2) abandonment of projects after expending resources to pursue such opportunities; (3) cost overruns; (4) construction delays; and (5) failure to achieve expected occupancy and/or rent levels within the projected time frame, if at all.
In addition to the risks associated with real estate investments in general, as described elsewhere, the risks associated with repositioning and redevelopment projects include: (1) delays or failures in obtaining necessary zoning, occupancy, land use, and other governmental permits; (2) abandonment of projects after expending resources to pursue such opportunities; (3) cost overruns; (4) construction delays; and (5) failure to achieve expected occupancy and/or rent levels within the projected time frame, if at all.
Finally, we can provide no assurance that we are aware of all potential environmental liabilities or that the environmental studies performed by us have identified or will identify all material environmental conditions that may exist with respect to any of the properties in our Portfolio; that any previous owner, occupant, or tenant did not create any material environmental condition unknown to us; that our properties will not be affected by tenants or nearby properties or other unrelated third parties; or that changes in environmental laws and regulations will not result in additional environmental liabilities to us.
Finally, we can provide no assurance that we are aware of all potential environmental liabilities or that the environmental studies performed by us have identified or will identify all material environmental conditions that 10 may exist with respect to any of the properties in our Portfolio; that any previous owner, occupant, or tenant did not create any material environmental condition unknown to us; that our properties will not be affected by tenants or nearby properties or other unrelated third parties; or that changes in environmental laws and regulations will not result in additional environmental liabilities to us.
Our CSIRP provides clear communication protocols, including with respect to members of management, which may include, depending on the incident's classification and other circumstances, members of the IRT, CEO, CFO, CIO, General Counsel, Audit Committee, and external counsel. In addition, the CSIRP considers communications and reporting to tenants, regulators, and law enforcement.
Our CSIRP provides clear communication protocols, including with respect to members of management, which may include, depending on the incident's classification and other circumstances, members of the IRT, CEO, CFO, CIO, 16 General Counsel, Audit Committee, and external counsel. In addition, the CSIRP considers communications and reporting to tenants, regulators, and law enforcement.
The IRT is led by an incident response coordinator, which in the event of a cybersecurity incident would generally be the CIO, and includes members of our IT resources, risk management, legal, communications, finance, and accounting teams, in addition to any other personnel depending on the particular facts and circumstances of the incident.
The IRT is led by an incident response coordinator, which in the event of a cybersecurity incident would generally be the CIO, and includes members of our IT resources, risk management, legal, communications, finance, and accounting teams, in addition to other personnel depending on the particular facts and circumstances of the cybersecurity incident.
In addition, the REIT provisions of the Code impose a 100% tax on income from "prohibited transactions." Prohibited transactions generally include sales of assets, other than foreclosure property, that constitute inventory or other property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.
In addition, the REIT provisions of the Code impose a 100% tax on income from "prohibited transactions." Prohibited transactions generally include sales of assets, other than foreclosure property, which constitute inventory or other property held for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business.
A cybersecurity attack, such as a ransomware attack, could compromise the confidential information, including the personally identifiable information, of our employees, tenants, and vendors, disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and IT systems, result in misstated financial reports or covenants under various financing agreements, and/or missed reporting deadlines, prevent us from properly monitoring our REIT qualification, result in our inability to maintain the building systems relied upon by our tenants for the efficient use of their leased space, or require significant management attention and resources to remedy any damages that result.
A cybersecurity incident could compromise the confidential information, including the personally identifiable information, of our employees, tenants, and vendors, disrupt the proper functioning of our networks and IT systems, result in misstated financial reports or covenants under various financing agreements, and/or missed reporting deadlines, prevent us from properly monitoring our REIT qualification, result in our inability to maintain the building systems relied upon by our tenants for the efficient use of their leased space, or require significant management attention and resources to remedy any damages that result.
There are numerous shopping venues, including regional malls, outlet malls, other shopping centers, and e-commerce, which compete with our Portfolio in attracting and retaining retailers. As of December 31, 2024, leases are scheduled to expire in our Portfolio on a total of approximately 8.9% of leased GLA during 2025.
There are numerous shopping venues, including regional malls, outlet malls, other shopping centers, and e-commerce, which compete with our Portfolio in attracting and retaining retailers. As of December 31, 2025, leases are scheduled to expire in our Portfolio on a total of approximately 8.1% of leased GLA during 2026.
Attacks may be undertaken by individuals or may be highly organized attempts by very sophisticated organizations. We employ a variety of measures to prevent, detect, and mitigate these threats; however, there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful in preventing or mitigating a cybersecurity attack.
Such activities may be undertaken by individuals or may be highly organized attempts by very sophisticated organizations. We employ a variety of measures to prevent, detect, and mitigate these threats; however, there is no guarantee that such efforts will be successful in preventing or mitigating a cybersecurity incident.
If we fail to reinvest in our Portfolio or maintain its attractiveness to retailers and consumers, if our capital improvements are not successful, or if retailers and consumers perceive that shopping at other venues (including e-commerce) is more convenient, cost-effective, or otherwise more compelling, our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows could be adversely impacted.
If we fail to reinvest in our Portfolio or maintain its attractiveness to retailers and consumers, if our capital improvements are not successful, or if retailers and consumers perceive that shopping at other venues (including e-commerce) is more convenient, cost-effective, or otherwise more compelling, our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows could be adversely impacted. 7 Significant retailer distress across our Portfolio could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows.
If BPG fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and BPG is not entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions: • BPG would be taxed as a non-REIT "C" corporation, which under current laws, among other things, means being unable to deduct dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and being subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, which would reduce BPG’s cash flows and funds available for distribution to stockholders; and • BPG would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which it failed to qualify as a REIT. 13 Changes to the U.S. federal income tax laws, including the enactment of certain tax reform measures, could have a material and adverse effect on us.
If BPG fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and BPG is not entitled to relief under applicable statutory provisions: • BPG would be taxed as a non-REIT "C" corporation, which under current laws, among other things, means being unable to deduct dividends paid to stockholders in computing taxable income and being subject to U.S. federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates, which would reduce BPG’s cash flows and funds available for distribution to stockholders; and • BPG would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year in which it failed to qualify as a REIT.
Any of these outcomes could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows. Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, and an increase in our debt service obligations may adversely affect our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows. Since 2022, interest rates have been significantly higher than in recent years.
As a result, our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows could be adversely impacted. Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, and an increase in our debt service obligations may adversely affect our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows. Since 2022, interest rates have been significantly higher than in recent years.
Containment, Eradication, Recovery, and Reporting The IRT is responsible for deciding on a containment strategy to respond to the cybersecurity incident, coordinating resources, and communicating to management with subsequent notification to the Audit Committee, if warranted. The IRT also directs and coordinates eradication and recovery efforts.
Containment, Eradication, Recovery, and Reporting The IRT is responsible for deciding on a containment strategy to respond to the cybersecurity incident, coordinating resources, and communicating to management with subsequent notification to the Audit Committee, if warranted. The IRT also directs and coordinates eradication and recovery efforts. Containment, eradication, and recovery may be aided by third-party vendors or investigators.
The costs of investigation and removal or remediation of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect our ability to lease such property, to borrow funds using such property as collateral, or to dispose of such property. 10 In addition, certain of our properties may contain asbestos-containing building materials ("ACBM").
The costs of investigation and removal or remediation of such substances may be substantial, and the presence of such substances, or the failure to properly remediate such substances, may adversely affect our ability to lease such property, to borrow funds using such property as collateral, or to dispose of such property.
We rely extensively on information technology ("IT") systems, including systems through vendors and third parties, to operate and manage our business and process transactions, and as a result, our business is at risk from, and may be impacted by, cybersecurity attacks. These attacks could include attempts to gain unauthorized access to our data and/or IT systems.
We rely extensively on IT systems, including systems through vendors and third parties, to operate and manage our business and process transactions, and as a result, our business is at risk from, and may be impacted by, 11 cybersecurity incidents.
Our access to external capital depends upon several factors, including general market conditions, our current and potential future earnings, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our liquidity and leverage ratios, and our cash distributions. Additionally, since 2022, interest rates have been significantly higher than in recent years.
Our access to external capital depends upon several factors, including general market conditions, our current and potential future earnings, the market’s perception of our growth potential, our liquidity and leverage ratios, and our cash distributions. In recent years, interest rates have fluctuated significantly. Interest rate increases negatively affect our ability to efficiently refinance our outstanding debt.
A successful attack could also damage our reputation and result in significant remediation costs, regulatory investigations, and potential litigation. 11 Similarly, our tenants rely extensively on IT systems to process transactions and manage their businesses and thus are also at risk from, and may be impacted by, cybersecurity attacks, which could impact their ability to pay rent timely or at all.
Similarly, our tenants rely extensively on IT systems to process transactions and manage their businesses and thus are also at risk from, and may be impacted by, cybersecurity incidents, which could impact their ability to pay rent timely or at all.
Under Maryland law and BPG’s charter, BPG’s directors and officers do not have any liability to BPG or BPG’s stockholders for money damages other than liability resulting from: • the actual receipt of an improper benefit or profit in money, property, or services; or • active and deliberate dishonesty by the director or officer that was established by a final judgment and is material to the cause of action adjudicated. 12 BPG’s charter authorizes, and BPG’s bylaws require, BPG to indemnify each of BPG’s directors and officers who is made a party to or witness in a proceeding by reason of his or her service in those capacities (or in a similar capacity at another entity at the request of BPG), to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law, from and against any claim or liability to which such person may become subject by reason of his or her status as a present or former director or officer of BPG.
BPG’s charter authorizes, and BPG’s bylaws require, BPG to indemnify each of BPG’s directors and officers who is made a party to or witness in a proceeding by reason of his or her service in those capacities (or in a similar capacity at another entity at the request of BPG), to the maximum extent permitted under Maryland law, from and against any claim or liability to which such person may become subject by reason of his or her status as a present or former director or officer of BPG.
We formed Incap as part of our overall risk management program to stabilize insurance costs, manage exposures, and recoup expenses through the function of the captive program. Incap is capitalized in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements. We also maintain commercial liability, fire, extended coverage, earthquake, business interruption, and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our Portfolio.
Incap underwrites the first layer of general liability insurance for the properties in our Portfolio. We formed Incap as part of our overall risk management program to stabilize insurance costs, manage exposures, and recoup expenses through the function of the captive program. Incap is capitalized in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements. 20 Item 3 .
Our high-quality national Portfolio is primarily located within established trade areas in the top 50 CBSAs in the U.S., and our shopping centers are primarily anchored by non-discretionary and value-oriented retailers, as well as consumer-oriented service providers. As of December 31, 2024, our three largest tenants by ABR were The TJX Companies, Inc., The Kroger Co., and Burlington Stores, Inc.
Properties As of December 31, 2025, our Portfolio was comprised of 348 shopping centers totaling approximately 63 million square feet of GLA. Our high-quality national Portfolio is primarily located within established trade areas in the top 50 CBSAs in the U.S., and our shopping centers are primarily anchored by non-discretionary and value-oriented retailers, as well as consumer-oriented service providers.
The credit ratings assigned are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, financial condition and prospects, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry. Our credit rating can affect our ability to access debt capital, as well as the terms of certain existing and potential future debt financings.
Our creditworthiness is rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies. The credit ratings assigned are based on our operating performance, liquidity and leverage ratios, financial condition and prospects, and other factors viewed by the credit rating agencies as relevant to our industry.
Management and Board Oversight We have dedicated cybersecurity resources led by our Chief Information Officer ("CIO"), who regularly provides reports on cybersecurity to our executive officers, including the CEO and CFO. Our CIO has significant experience in the cybersecurity and IT fields and holds multiple degrees, including a Bachelor of Science in Information Science and a Master of Business Administration.
Management and Board Oversight We have dedicated cybersecurity resources, including our incident response team ("IRT"), led by our Chief Information Officer ("CIO"), who regularly provides reports on cybersecurity to our executive officers, including the CEO and CFO.
Processes for Assessing, Identifying, and Managing Material Risks from Cybersecurity Threats Our cybersecurity program has four components: (1) preparation and prevention; (2) detection and analysis; (3) incident response including containment, eradication, recovery, and reporting; and (4) post-incident analysis and program enhancements. 15 Preparation and Prevention We utilize a variety of tools, processes, software, and hardware that are managed and monitored by our IT resources including third-party vendors, as applicable, to prevent and prepare for cybersecurity threats.
Processes for Assessing, Identifying, and Managing Material Risks from Cybersecurity Threats Our cybersecurity program has four components: (1) preparation and prevention; (2) detection and analysis; (3) incident response including containment, eradication, recovery, and reporting; and (4) post-incident analysis and program enhancements.
The direct and indirect impact on us and our tenants from severe weather, flooding, and other effects of climate change, and the economic and reputational impacts of the transition to non-carbon based energy, could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows.
The direct and indirect impact on us and our tenants from severe weather events, including flooding, wildfires, and hurricanes, could adversely affect our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows.
The foregoing general description of the characteristics of the leases of our Portfolio is not intended to describe all leases, and material variations in lease terms may exist. Insurance We have a wholly owned captive insurance company, Brixmor Incap, LLC (“Incap”). Incap underwrites the first layer of general liability insurance for the properties in our Portfolio.
The foregoing general description of the characteristics of the leases of our Portfolio is not intended to describe all leases, and material variations in lease terms may exist. Insurance We maintain commercial liability, fire, extended coverage, earthquake, business interruption, and rental loss insurance covering all of the properties in our Portfolio.
We recognize that our third-party vendors can be subject to cybersecurity incidents which may impact us. To mitigate third-party risk, vendor access to our network resources is reviewed, authorized, and monitored for appropriateness. Third-party IT vendors that are determined to present a higher risk are also subject to additional diligence such as questionnaires, inquiries, and relevant certifications.
Third-party IT vendors that are determined to present a higher risk are also subject to additional diligence such as questionnaires, inquiries, and relevant certifications.
We may be unable to acquire desired properties because of competition from other real estate investors, including from other well-capitalized REITs and institutional investment funds. Even if we are able to acquire desired properties, competition from such investors may significantly increase the price we must pay.
Our ability to acquire properties on favorable terms and successfully integrate, operate, reposition, or redevelop such properties is subject to several risks. We may be unable to acquire desired properties because of competition from other real estate investors, including from other well-capitalized REITs and institutional investment funds.
Any legislative action, including the possibility of major tax legislation, may prospectively or retroactively modify BPG’s tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of BPG or BPG’s stockholders. Stockholders should consult with their tax advisors with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in BPG’s stock.
Stockholders should consult with their tax advisors with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in BPG’s stock. Complying with REIT requirements may force BPG to liquidate or restructure investments or forgo otherwise attractive investment opportunities, and/or may discourage BPG from disposing of certain assets.
As a result, our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows be adversely impacted. Adverse changes in our credit rating could affect our borrowing ability and the terms of existing or new financing. Our creditworthiness is rated by nationally recognized credit rating agencies.
If, in the future, we are not able to effectively mitigate these interest rate risks by utilizing interest rate swaps, that we have historically employed, our access to capital, as well as our financial condition, operating results, and cash flows could be adversely impacted. 9 Adverse changes in our credit rating could affect our borrowing ability and the terms of existing or new financing.
Even if these events do not directly impact our properties, they have impacted and may continue to impact us and our tenants through increases in insurance, energy or other costs. In addition, the ongoing transition to non-carbon based energy presents certain risks for us and our tenants, including risks related to high energy costs and energy shortages, among other things.
Even if these events do not directly impact our properties, they have impacted and may continue to impact us and our tenants through increases in insurance, energy, or other costs. In addition, changes in laws or regulations, including federal, state, or local laws, relating to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions could result in increased costs and capital expenditures.
Therefore, a key element of our prevention efforts is training employees to recognize and respond to cybersecurity threats. All new hires receive mandatory privacy and information security training. Employees must also complete mandatory ongoing annual cybersecurity and data trainings, which are supplemented throughout the year by regular phishing and other cyber-related awareness activities.
Employees must also complete mandatory ongoing annual cybersecurity and data trainings, which are supplemented throughout the year by regular phishing and other cyber-related awareness activities. To mitigate third-party risk, vendor access to our network resources is reviewed, authorized, and monitored for appropriateness.
The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"), the U.S. Treasury Department, and Congress frequently review U.S. federal income tax legislation, regulations, and other guidance. BPG cannot predict whether, when, or to what extent new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations, or rulings will be adopted.
BPG cannot predict whether, when, or to what extent new U.S. federal tax laws, regulations, interpretations, or rulings will be adopted. Any legislative action, including the possibility of major tax legislation, may prospectively or retroactively modify BPG’s tax treatment and, therefore, may adversely affect taxation of BPG or BPG’s stockholders.
However, there can be no assurance that our cybersecurity efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted cybersecurity incidents or disruptions would not be successful or damaging. See "We and our tenants face risks relating to cybersecurity attacks that could cause the loss of confidential information or other business disruptions" in Item 1A.
Cybersecurity Risks As of December 31, 2025, we have not had any known instances of material cybersecurity incidents, including third-party incidents, during any of the prior three fiscal years. However, there can be no assurance that our cybersecurity efforts and measures will be effective or that attempted cybersecurity incidents or disruptions would not be successful or damaging.
The following table summarizes our top 20 tenants, ranked by ABR, as of December 31, 2024 (dollars in thousands, except for PSF amounts): Retailer Owned Leases (1) Leased GLA (1) Percent of GLA (1) ABR (1) Percent of ABR (1) ABR PSF (1) The TJX Companies, Inc. 90 2,604,394 4.1 % $ 33,176 3.3 % $ 12.74 The Kroger Co. 45 3,037,909 4.7 % 23,207 2.3 % 7.64 Burlington Stores, Inc. 44 1,829,056 2.9 % 20,987 2.1 % 11.47 Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. 119 1,357,291 2.1 % 16,509 1.6 % 12.16 Publix Super Markets, Inc. 32 1,490,442 2.3 % 14,898 1.5 % 10.00 Ross Stores, Inc 43 1,100,750 1.7 % 13,946 1.4 % 12.67 Five Below, Inc. 65 622,769 1.0 % 12,626 1.2 % 20.27 Amazon.com, Inc. / Whole Foods Market Services, Inc. 18 654,782 1.0 % 12,040 1.2 % 18.39 L.A Fitness International, LLC 15 606,956 0.9 % 11,737 1.2 % 19.34 PetSmart, Inc. 27 587,611 0.9 % 10,121 1.0 % 17.22 Ulta Beauty, Inc. 37 405,313 0.6 % 9,905 1.0 % 24.44 Albertson's Companies, Inc 14 750,202 1.2 % 9,877 1.0 % 13.17 Ahold Delhaize 15 797,807 1.2 % 9,031 0.9 % 11.32 Kohl's Corporation 14 1,051,137 1.6 % 8,763 0.9 % 8.34 PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc. 35 479,951 0.7 % 8,630 0.9 % 17.98 The Michaels Companies, Inc. 23 515,734 0.8 % 6,895 0.7 % 13.37 ALDI 20 616,530 1.0 % 5,913 0.6 % 9.59 Barnes & Noble, Inc. 17 332,382 0.5 % 5,690 0.6 % 17.12 JOANN Stores, Inc. 19 423,020 0.7 % 5,483 0.5 % 12.96 Party City Holdco Inc. 24 353,833 0.6 % 5,342 0.5 % 15.10 TOP 20 RETAILERS 716 19,617,869 30.5 % $ 244,776 24.4 % $ 12.48 (1) Includes only locations which are owned or guaranteed by the parent company.
The following table summarizes our top 20 tenants, ranked by ABR, as of December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands, except for PSF amounts): Retailer Owned Leases (1) Leased GLA (1) Percent of GLA (1) ABR (1) Percent of ABR (1) ABR PSF (1) The TJX Companies, Inc. 90 2,564,676 4.1 % $ 33,673 3.2 % $ 13.13 The Kroger Co. 44 3,000,900 4.8 % 24,006 2.3 % 8.00 Burlington Stores, Inc. 46 1,725,367 2.8 % 21,564 2.1 % 12.50 Publix Super Markets, Inc. 34 1,587,457 2.5 % 16,748 1.6 % 10.55 Ross Stores, Inc 50 1,246,499 2.0 % 16,422 1.6 % 13.17 Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. 108 1,253,821 2.0 % 15,868 1.5 % 12.66 Five Below, Inc. 66 631,887 1.0 % 12,962 1.2 % 20.51 Amazon.com, Inc. / Whole Foods Market Services, Inc. 19 658,464 1.1 % 12,371 1.2 % 18.79 L.A Fitness International, LLC 13 528,162 0.8 % 10,566 1.0 % 20.01 Ulta Beauty, Inc. 39 423,324 0.7 % 10,509 1.0 % 24.82 PetSmart, Inc. 28 609,077 1.0 % 10,462 1.0 % 17.18 Albertson's Companies, Inc 14 749,018 1.2 % 9,875 0.9 % 13.18 PETCO Animal Supplies, Inc. 34 477,934 0.8 % 8,605 0.8 % 18.00 Ahold Delhaize 13 736,178 1.2 % 8,492 0.8 % 11.54 Kohl's Corporation 13 963,606 1.5 % 7,405 0.7 % 7.68 The Michaels Companies, Inc. 24 544,061 0.9 % 7,298 0.7 % 13.41 Barnes & Noble, Inc. 18 352,382 0.6 % 6,115 0.6 % 17.35 Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. 9 245,212 0.4 % 6,076 0.6 % 24.78 Best Buy Co., Inc. 12 434,051 0.7 % 5,979 0.6 % 13.77 DICK's Sporting Goods, Inc. 17 369,005 0.6 % 5,912 0.6 % 16.02 TOP 20 RETAILERS 691 19,101,081 30.7 % $ 250,908 24.0 % $ 13.14 (1) Includes only locations which are owned or guaranteed by the parent company.
Changes in laws or regulations, including federal, state, or local laws, relating to climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our properties. Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure BPG’s board of directors may change significant corporate policies without stockholder approval.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure BPG’s board of directors may change significant corporate policies without stockholder approval. BPG’s investment, financing, and dividend policies and our policies with respect to all other business activities, including strategy and operations, will be determined by BPG’s board of directors.