Biggest changeAs such, FDA has structured the proposed phaseout policy to contain five key stages: ● Stage 1: End the general enforcement discretion approach with respect to Medical Device Regulation (MDR) requirements and correction and removal reporting requirements 1 year after FDA publishes a final phaseout policy, which FDA intends to issue in the preamble of the final rule. ● Stage 2: End the general enforcement discretion approach with respect to requirements other than MDR, correction and removal reporting, Quality System (QS), and premarket review requirements 2 years after FDA publishes a final phaseout policy. ● Stage 3: End the general enforcement discretion approach with respect to QS requirements 3 years after FDA publishes a final phaseout policy. ● Stage 4: End the general enforcement discretion approach with respect to premarket review requirements for high-risk IVDs 3.5 years after FDA publishes a final phaseout policy, but not before October 1, 2027. ● Stage 5: End the general enforcement discretion approach with respect to premarket review requirements for moderate risk and low risk IVDs (that require premarket submissions) 4 years after FDA publishes a final phaseout policy, but not before April 1, 2028.
Biggest changeThe phaseout policy contains the following five stages: ● Stage 1: Beginning on May 6, 2025, which is one year after the publication date of the final LDT rule, FDA will expect compliance with medical device reporting (MDR) requirements, correction and removal reporting requirements, and quality system (QS) requirements regarding complaint files. ● Stage 2: Beginning on May 6, 2026, which is 2 years after the publication date of the final LDT rule, FDA will expect compliance with requirements not covered during other stages of the phaseout policy, including registration and listing requirements, labeling requirements, and investigational use requirements. ● Stage 3: Beginning on May 6, 2027, which is 3 years after the publication date of the final LDT rule, FDA will expect compliance with QS requirements (other than requirements regarding complaint files which are already addressed in stage 1). ● Stage 4: Beginning on November 6, 2027, which is 3½ years after the publication date of the final LDT rule, FDA will expect compliance with premarket review requirements for high-risk IVDs offered as LDTs (IVDs that may be classified into class III or that are subject to licensure under section 351 of the Public Health Service Act), unless a premarket submission has been received by the beginning of this stage in which case FDA intends to continue to exercise enforcement discretion for the pendency of its review. ● Stage 5: Beginning on May 6, 2028, which is 4 years after the publication date of the final LDT rule, FDA will expect compliance with premarket review requirements for moderate-risk and low-risk IVDs offered as LDTs (that require premarket submissions), unless a premarket submission has been received by the beginning of this stage in which case FDA intends to continue to exercise enforcement discretion for the pendency of its review. 4 The FDA also intends to exercise enforcement discretion and generally not enforce some or all applicable requirements for certain categories of IVDs manufactured by a laboratory.
However, the absence of such marks is not intended to indicate, in any way, Lucid or its subsidiaries will not assert, to the fullest extent possible under applicable law, their respective rights to such trademarks and trade names.) Health Insurance Coverage and Reimbursement Our ability to successfully commercialize our products will depend in part on the extent to which governmental authorities, private health insurers and other third-party payors provide coverage for and establish adequate reimbursement levels for the procedures during which our products are used.
However, the absence of such marks is not intended to indicate, in any way, Lucid or its subsidiaries will not assert, to the fullest extent possible under applicable law, their respective rights to such trademarks and trade names.) 9 Health Insurance Coverage and Reimbursement Our ability to successfully commercialize our products will depend in part on the extent to which governmental authorities, private health insurers and other third-party payors provide coverage for and establish adequate reimbursement levels for the procedures during which our products are used.
Clinical validation analysis demonstrated improved sensitivity and specificity for the detection of esophageal precancer, having demonstrated enhanced assay performance and lower costs in extensive validation studies. 4 Competition The U.S. market for esophageal cancer (i.e., EAC) and pre-cancer (i.e., BE, with or without dysplasia) testing is large, consisting of more than 30 million at-risk individuals over the age of 50.
Clinical validation analysis demonstrated improved sensitivity and specificity for the detection of esophageal precancer, having demonstrated enhanced assay performance and lower costs in extensive validation studies. Competition The U.S. market for esophageal cancer (i.e., EAC) and pre-cancer (i.e., BE, with or without dysplasia) testing is large, consisting of more than 30 million at-risk individuals over the age of 50.
Two independent clinical validation case control studies funded by the National Institute of Health utilized were performed using upper endoscopy with biopsies as the diagnostic comparator and confirmed EsoGuard accurately identifies BE. A pooled analysis of both studies demonstrated 84% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 76-90%), for detection of BE, and 86% specificity (95% CI 81-91%).
Two independent clinical validation case control studies funded by the National Institute of Health utilized were performed using upper endoscopy with biopsies as the diagnostic comparator and confirmed EsoGuard accurately identifies BE. A pooled analysis of both studies demonstrated 84% sensitivity (95% confidence interval (“CI”) 76-90%), for detection of BE, and 86% specificity (95% CI 81-91%).
Manufacturing cGMP Requirements Manufacturers of medical devices are required to comply with FDA manufacturing requirements contained in FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) set forth in the quality system regulations promulgated under section 520 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. cGMP regulations require, among other things, quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and documentation.
Manufacturing cGMP Requirements Manufacturers of medical devices are required to comply with FDA manufacturing requirements contained in FDA’s current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMP”) set forth in the quality system regulations promulgated under section 520 of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. cGMP regulations require, among other things, quality control and quality assurance as well as the corresponding maintenance of records and documentation.
During the approval or clearance process, FDA typically inspects the records relating to the conduct of one or more investigational sites participating in the study supporting the application. Post-Approval Regulation of Medical Devices and Diagnostic Tests After a device is cleared or approved for marketing, numerous regulatory requirements continue to apply.
During the approval or clearance process, FDA typically inspects the records relating to the conduct of one or more investigational sites participating in the study supporting the application. 11 Post-Approval Regulation of Medical Devices and Diagnostic Tests After a device is cleared or approved for marketing, numerous regulatory requirements continue to apply.
In March 2023, we launched a Direct Contracting Strategic Initiative (“DCSI”) to engage directly with large Administrative Services Only (“ASO”) self-insured employers, unions and other entities, seeking to replicate the successes of other cancer screening diagnostic companies that have deployed similar strategies.
In March 2023, we launched a direct contracting strategic initiative to engage directly with large Administrative Services Only (“ASO”) self-insured employers, unions and other entities, seeking to replicate the successes of other cancer screening diagnostic companies that have deployed similar strategies.
Other companies have been prosecuted for causing false claims to be submitted because of the companies’ marketing of products for unapproved, and thus noncovered, uses. 10 The government may further prosecute, as a crime, conduct constituting a false claim under the False Claims Act.
Other companies have been prosecuted for causing false claims to be submitted because of the companies’ marketing of products for unapproved, and thus noncovered, uses. The government may further prosecute, as a crime, conduct constituting a false claim under the False Claims Act.
The quickest and least expensive pathway would be 510(k) clearance with a review of existing bench and animal data. A de novo classification pathway would have a similar cost to seeking 510(k) clearance, but with a slightly longer review timeline. Th e longest and most expensive path would be a PMA with extensive randomized human clinical trials.
The quickest and least expensive pathway would be 510(k) clearance with a review of existing bench and animal data. A de novo classification pathway would have a similar cost to seeking 510(k) clearance, but with a slightly longer review timeline. The longest and most expensive path would be a PMA with extensive randomized human clinical trials.
The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, nor in any other report or document we file or furnish with and /or submit to the SEC, and any reference to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only. 13
The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K, nor in any other report or document we file or furnish with and /or submit to the SEC, and any reference to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only. 16
Regulation FDA Regulation For the purposes of FDA regulation a “medical device” is broadly defined in section 201(h) of the FDCA as “an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in-vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, which is intended for use in humans for the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or intended to affect the structure or any function of the body, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of its primary intended purposes.” Medical devices subject to FDA regulation include “in-vitro diagnostic medical devices” or IVD devices, defined in the same FDCA section as “reagents, instruments, and systems intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, including a determination of the state of health, in order to cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent disease or its sequelae, which are intended for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens taken from the human body”.
Regulation FDA Regulation For the purposes of FDA regulation a “medical device” is broadly defined in section 201(h) of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) as “an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in-vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, which is intended for use in humans for the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or intended to affect the structure or any function of the body, and which does not achieve its primary intended purposes through chemical action and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of its primary intended purposes.” Medical devices subject to FDA regulation include “in-vitro diagnostic medical devices” or IVD devices, defined in the same FDCA section as “reagents, instruments, and systems intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, including a determination of the state of health, in order to cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent disease or its sequelae, which are intended for use in the collection, preparation, and examination of specimens taken from the human body”.
For example, EndoSign, commercialized by Cyted, and much like Cytosponge and our own EsophaCap before it, is a small mesh sponge within a soluble gelatin capsule that needs to reside in the stomach for some time until it fully dissolves and then is pulled thru the targeted region brushing the lining of the esophagus and then later retrieved, although, unlike EsoCheck, it is unprotected from sample contamination as the brush later passes regions of the upper esophagus and mouth.
For example, EndoSign, commercialized by Cyted, and much like Cytosponge, is a small mesh sponge within a soluble gelatin capsule that needs to reside in the stomach for some time until it fully dissolves and then is pulled thru the targeted region brushing the lining of the esophagus and then later retrieved, although, unlike EsoCheck, it is unprotected from sample contamination as the brush later passes regions of the upper esophagus and mouth.
EsoGuard and EsoCheck are based on patented technology licensed by Lucid from Case Western Reserve University (“CWRU”). EsoGuard and EsoCheck have been developed to provide accurate, non-invasive, patient-friendly testing for the early detection of EAC and Barrett’s Esophagus (“BE”), including dysplastic BE and related pre-cursors to EAC in patients with chronic GERD. Market Opportunity In 2023, approximately 20,000 U.S.
EsoGuard and EsoCheck are based on patented technology licensed by Lucid from Case Western Reserve University (“CWRU”). EsoGuard and EsoCheck have been developed to provide accurate, non-invasive, patient-friendly testing for the early detection of EAC and Barrett’s Esophagus (“BE”), including dysplastic BE and related pre-cursors to EAC in patients with chronic GERD. Market Opportunity In 2024, approximately 22,000 U.S.
These criteria include active GERD with at least two risk factors, as well as evidence of analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility.
These criteria include active GERD with at least three risk factors, as well as evidence of analytic validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility.
Our EsoCheck device faces competition from other manufactures with devices designed to collect cell samples from targeted regions of the esophagus.
Our EsoCheck device faces competition from other manufacturers with devices designed to collect cell samples from targeted regions of the esophagus.
Item 1. Business Background and Overview Lucid Diagnostics Inc. (“Lucid”) is a commercial-stage medical diagnostics technology company focused on the millions of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (“GERD”), also known as chronic heartburn, acid reflux or simply reflux, who are at risk of developing esophageal precancer and cancer, specifically highly lethal esophageal adenocarcinoma (“EAC”).
Background and Overview Lucid Diagnostics is a commercial-stage medical diagnostics technology company focused on the millions of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (“GERD”), also known as chronic heartburn, acid reflux or simply reflux, who are at risk of developing esophageal precancer and cancer, specifically highly lethal esophageal adenocarcinoma (“EAC”).
For the first time, however, the clinical guideline also endorses nonendoscopic biomarker screening as an acceptable alternative to costly and invasive endoscopy stating that “a swallowable nonendoscopic capsule device combined with a biomarker is an acceptable alternative to endoscopy for BE.” The clinical guideline specifically mentions EsoCheck, along with our EsophaCap® device, as such swallowable, nonendoscopic esophageal cell collection devices, as well as methylated DNA biomarkers such as EsoGuard.
For the first time, however, the clinical guideline also endorses non-endoscopic biomarker screening as an acceptable alternative to costly and invasive endoscopy stating that “a swallowable non-endoscopic capsule device combined with a biomarker is an acceptable alternative to endoscopy for BE.” The clinical guideline specifically mentions EsoCheck as such a swallowable, non-endoscopic esophageal cell collection device, as well as methylated DNA biomarkers such as EsoGuard.
Presently, PAVmed controls more than 50% of the combined voting power of our common stock and our convertible securities. However, PAVmed’s percentage of the combined voting power may decrease when dividends are paid on our convertible securities and to the extent our convertible securities are converted into shares of our common stock.
Presently, PAVmed controls less than 50% of the combined voting power of our common stock and our convertible securities. In addition, PAVmed’s percentage of the combined voting power may decrease when dividends are paid on our convertible securities and to the extent our convertible securities are converted into shares of our common stock.
We are confident that the proposed policy will not have a commercial impact as the Company already has a robust QS management platform for medical devices and EsoGuard will be able to transition to the platform to fulfill the QS requirements, if and when required by the FDA.
We are confident that the proposed final rule will not have a commercial impact as the Company already has a robust QS management platform for medical devices and EsoGuard will be able to easily transition to the platform to fulfill the QS requirements, as required by the FDA.
The date the patents protecting certain of our owned and licensed technology will first begin to expire is as set forth in the table below (although currently pending patent applications, both foreign and domestic, are positioned to provide protection beyond such date in each instance).
Each of the technologies noted below is protected by multiple families. The date the patents protecting certain of our owned and licensed technology will first begin to expire is as set forth in the table below (although currently pending patent applications, both foreign and domestic, provide protection beyond such date in each instance).
Our current test center network currently includes locations in metropolitan areas in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Nevada, Ohio, Oregon, Texas and Utah.
Our current test center network currently includes locations in metropolitan areas in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Michigan, Nevada, Texas and Utah.
Additionally, the legislatures in a number of states have passed laws mandating coverage of comprehensive biomarker testing over the past several years. We believe that EsoGuard falls within the definition of a biomarker test and thus we are reviewing how to leverage legislation in those states to expand access to EsoGuard.
Additionally, the legislatures in a number of states have passed laws mandating coverage of comprehensive biomarker testing over the past several years. We are reviewing how to leverage legislation in those states to expand access to and reimbursement of EsoGuard.
The MSA does not have a termination date, but may be terminated by our board of directors at any time. The PBERA likewise does not have a termination date, but may be terminated by PAVmed or Lucid at any time.
The MSA does not have a termination date, but may be terminated by our board of directors at any time.
License Agreement Under the terms of our license agreement with CWRU (as amended to date, the “Amended CWRU License Agreement”), we acquired an exclusive worldwide right to use the intellectual property rights to the EsoGuard and EsoCheck technology for the detection of changes in the esophagus and on sample preservation.
Path-Tec also manages warehousing, logistics, fulfillment and customer support of our products. 3 License Agreement Under the terms of our license agreement with CWRU (as amended to date, the “Amended CWRU License Agreement”), we acquired an exclusive worldwide right to use the intellectual property rights to the EsoGuard and EsoCheck technology for the detection of changes in the esophagus and on sample preservation.
PAVmed owns approximately 70.1% as of December 31, 2023 and 64.9% as of March 21, 2024 of the combined voting power of our outstanding common stock (with such percentage inclusive of shares of our common stock underlying granted but unvested restricted stock awards), but excluding the voting power of any convertible securities.
PAVmed owns approximately 46% as of December 31, 2024 and 34% as of March 20, 2025 of the combined voting power of our outstanding common stock (with such percentage inclusive of shares of our common stock underlying granted but unvested restricted stock awards), but excluding the voting power of any convertible securities.
In October 2020, CMS granted EsoGuard final Medicare payment determination of $1,938.01, effective January 1, 2021. 2 A final Local Coverage Determination (“LCD”) L39256, entitled “ Molecular Testing for Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Metaplasia, Dysplasia, and Neoplasia ” became effective in May 2023 on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) website by MAC Palmetto GBA.
A final Local Coverage Determination (“LCD”) L39256, entitled “ Molecular Testing for Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Metaplasia, Dysplasia, and Neoplasia ” became effective in May 2023 on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) website by MAC Palmetto GBA.
It is our understanding that the data we are collecting for EsoGuard will be sufficient to support the analytical and clinical validity requirements for a premarket submission to the FDA as and when required by FDA’s final policy anticipated to be released by the FDA in April 2024. 8 Clinical Trials of Medical Devices and Diagnostic Tests One or more clinical trials may be necessary to support an FDA submission.
It is our understanding that the data we are collecting for EsoGuard will be sufficient to support the analytical and clinical validity requirements for a premarket submission to the FDA. Clinical Trials of Medical Devices and Diagnostic Tests One or more clinical trials may be necessary to support an FDA submission.
PAVmed may elect that our obligations under each of the MSA and the PBERA are settled by the issuance of our stock (instead of cash), subject to applicable restrictions under securities laws (and, in the case of the PBERA, subject also to approval by our board).
PAVmed may elect that our obligations under each of the MSA and the PBERA are settled by the issuance of our stock (instead of cash), subject to applicable restrictions under securities laws (and, in the case of the PBERA, subject also to approval by our board), although under the terms of PAVmed’s convertible debt, PAVmed is required to elect that these payments be made in cash.
Manufacturing EsoCheck is currently manufactured for us by our partners Coastline International (“Coastline”), a high-volume device manufacturer, and Sage Product Development. Our current line at Coastline can produce up to 25,000 units per year. With Coastline’s improvement and expansion, there is capacity to scale exponentially. Our EsoGuard Specimen Kits are currently manufactured for us by our partner Path-Tec.
Our current line at Coastline can produce up to 25,000 units per year. With Coastline’s improvement and expansion, there is capacity to scale exponentially. Our EsoGuard Specimen Kits are currently manufactured for us by our partner Path-Tec.
Physician Payment Sunshine Act On February 8, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, released its final rule implementing section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act known as the Physician Payment Sunshine Act that imposes annual reporting requirements on device manufacturers for payments and other transfers of value provided by them, directly or indirectly, to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their family members.
In any event, we have established a substantial regulatory and compliance infrastructure for the Lucid Test Centers and other EsoGuard programs and related activities that is designed to ensure compliance with these regulations. 12 Physician Payment Sunshine Act On February 8, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, released its final rule implementing section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act known as the Physician Payment Sunshine Act that imposes annual reporting requirements on device manufacturers for payments and other transfers of value provided by them, directly or indirectly, to physicians and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their family members.
Before and after approval or clearance in the United States, our products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and/or the Public Health Service Act, as well as by other regulatory bodies.
Pursuant to this designation, we will be working with FDA to submit the premarket submission for EsoGuard. 10 Before and after approval or clearance in the United States, our products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and/or the Public Health Service Act, as well as by other regulatory bodies.
In October 2023, FDA proposed a policy under which FDA intends to phase out its general enforcement discretion approach for LDTs so that IVDs manufactured by a laboratory would generally fall under the same enforcement approach as other IVDs.
In October 2023, FDA proposed a policy under which FDA intends to phase out its general enforcement discretion approach for LDTs so that IVDs manufactured by a laboratory would generally fall under the same enforcement approach as other IVDs. On May 6, 2024, the FDA issued a final rule aimed at helping to ensure the safety and effectiveness of LDTs.
European Union We received CE Mark certification for EsoCheck under MDD and completed CE Mark self-certification for EsoGuard, which qualifies as a General IVD, under IVDD, indicating that both may be marketed in CE Mark European countries, namely the European Economic Area (the European Union, Norway, Iceland, and Lichtenstein), Switzerland, and, until July 1, 2023, the United Kingdom.
The time required to obtain clearance required by foreign countries may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA clearance, and requirements for licensing a product in a foreign country may differ significantly from FDA requirements. 14 European Union We received CE Mark certification for EsoCheck under MDD and completed CE Mark self-certification for EsoGuard, which qualifies as a General IVD, under IVDD, indicating that both may be marketed in CE Mark European countries, namely the European Economic Area (the European Union, Norway, Iceland, and Lichtenstein), Switzerland, and, until July 1, 2023, the United Kingdom.
We are subject to comparable state laws, some of which apply to all payors regardless of source of payment, and do not contain identical exceptions to the Stark law. 11 International Regulation In order to market any of our products outside of the United States, we would need to comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries and jurisdictions regarding quality, safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of our products.
International Regulation In order to market any of our products outside of the United States, we would need to comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries and jurisdictions regarding quality, safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of our products.
Prior to acquiring or licensing a technology from a third party, we will evaluate the existing proprietary rights, our ability to adequately obtain and protect these rights and the likelihood or possibility of infringement upon competing rights of others. 6 We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovation, and may rely upon licensing opportunities, to develop and maintain our competitive position.
Prior to acquiring or licensing a technology from a third party, we will evaluate the existing proprietary rights, our ability to adequately obtain and protect these rights and the likelihood or possibility of infringement upon competing rights of others.
These laws include, without limitation, anti-kickback and false claims laws, data privacy and security laws, as well as transparency laws regarding payments or other items of value provided to healthcare providers. 9 Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available under such laws, it is possible that some of our business activities, including certain sales and marketing practices and the provision of certain items and services to our customers, could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws.
Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available under such laws, it is possible that some of our business activities, including certain sales and marketing practices and the provision of certain items and services to our customers, could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws.
Laboratory Operations On February 25, 2022, our new, wholly owned subsidiary, LucidDx Labs Inc. (“LucidDx Labs”), acquired from ResearchDX Inc. (“RDx”), certain licenses and other related assets necessary for LucidDx Labs to operate its own new CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited clinical laboratory located in Lake Forest, CA.
(“RDx”), certain licenses and other related assets necessary for LucidDx Labs to operate its own new CLIA-certified, CAP-accredited clinical laboratory located in Lake Forest, CA.
Our longer-term strategy is to secure a specific indication, based on published guidelines, for BE testing in certain at-risk populations using EsoGuard on samples collected with EsoCheck. This use of EsoGuard together with EsoCheck as a testing system must be cleared or approved by the FDA as an IVD device.
Our longer-term strategy is to secure a specific indication, based on published guidelines, for BE testing in certain at-risk populations using EsoGuard on samples collected with EsoCheck.
EAC is nearly always invasive at diagnosis, and, unlike other common cancers, mortality rates are high even in its earlier stages. As discussed below under the heading “Clinical Guidelines for At-Risk Population”, in July 2022, the American Gastroenterology Association (“AGA”) significantly expanded the target population for esophageal precancer screening, recommending screening in at-risk patients without symptoms of GERD.
As discussed below under the heading “Clinical Guidelines for At-Risk Population”, in July 2022, the American Gastroenterology Association (“AGA”) significantly expanded the target population for esophageal precancer screening, recommending screening in at-risk patients without symptoms of GERD.
The license agreement terminates upon the expiration of the last-to-expire licensed patent, or on May 12, 2038, in countries where no such patents exist, or upon expiration of any exclusive marketing rights for a licensed product that have been granted by FDA or other U.S. government agency, whichever comes later. 3 Regulatory In June 2019, we received FDA 510(k) clearance to market EsoCheck in the U.S. as a device indicated for use in the collection and retrieval of surface cells of the esophagus in adults followed by FDA 510(k) clearance in 2022, expanding the use of EsoCheck in adults and pediatric populations in the U.S.
The license agreement terminates upon the expiration of the last-to-expire licensed patent, or on May 12, 2038, in countries where no such patents exist, or upon expiration of any exclusive marketing rights for a licensed product that have been granted by FDA or other U.S. government agency, whichever comes later.
We continue to expand the EsoGuard and EsoCheck evidence portfolio with additional clinical utility, clinical validity, and analytical validity data from a range of ongoing studies and those that have recently completed or will be completed in the upcoming year.
Clinical utility studies are also important for general EsoGuard commercialization by facilitating physician understanding of test indications and potential benefit to the patients. We continue to expand the EsoGuard and EsoCheck evidence portfolio with additional clinical utility and clinical validity data from a range of ongoing studies and those that will be completed in the upcoming year.
Employees Currently, as of March 21, 2024 we have 70 employees (all of whom are full-time employees), inclusive of our executive officers –our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our President and Chief Operating Officer, (“President” or “COO”), our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and our General Counsel and Secretary (“General Counsel”).
There were no material capital expenditures for environmental control facilities in the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. 15 Employees As of March 20, 2025 we have 72 employees (all of whom are full-time employees), inclusive of our executive officers – our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), our President and Chief Operating Officer, (“President” or “COO”), our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and our General Counsel and Secretary (“General Counsel”).
Specimen Transportation Our commercialization activities for EsoGuard subject us to regulations of the Department of Transportation, the United States Postal Service, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that apply to the surface and air transportation of clinical laboratory specimens. 12 Environmental The cost of compliance with federal, state and local provisions related to the protection of the environment has had no material effect on our Diagnostics business.
Specimen Transportation Our commercialization activities for EsoGuard subject us to regulations of the Department of Transportation, the United States Postal Service, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that apply to the surface and air transportation of clinical laboratory specimens.
Intellectual Property Our business will depend on proprietary medical device and diagnostic technologies, including the EsoCheck and EsoGuard technology licensed by us. We intend to vigorously protect our proprietary technologies’ intellectual property rights in patents, trademarks and copyrights, as available through registration in the United States and internationally. Patent protection and other proprietary rights are thus essential to our business.
We intend to vigorously protect our proprietary technologies’ intellectual property rights in patents, trademarks and copyrights, as available through registration in the United States and internationally. Patent protection and other proprietary rights are thus essential to our business. We currently have applied for, license or own 20 domestic and foreign patents covering the EsoGuard and EsoCheck products and related technology.
(Solely as a matter of convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to herein may or may not be accompanied with the requisite marks of “™” or “®”.
Lucid also has proprietary rights to a range of trademarks, including, among others, Lucid Diagnostics™, LUCID™, EsoCheck®, EsoGuard®, Collect + Protect®, and EsoCheck Cell Collection Device®. (Solely as a matter of convenience, trademarks and trade names referred to herein may or may not be accompanied with the requisite marks of “™” or “®”.
GERD patients are projected to be diagnosed with EAC and approximately 16,000 will die from it. Over 80% of EAC patients will die within five years of diagnosis, making it the second most lethal cancer in the U.S.
GERD patients were diagnosed with EAC and approximately 16,000 will die from it. Over 80% of EAC patients will die within five years of diagnosis, making it the second most lethal cancer in the U.S. The U.S. incidence of EAC has increased 500% over the past four decades, while the incidences of other common cancers have declined or remained flat.
Although the LCD indicated that it found that no currently existing test has fulfilled all these criteria, it indicated that it will “monitor the evidence and may revise this determination based on the pertinent literature and society recommendations.” We expect to submit EsoGuard for Technical Assessment under this foundational LCD later this year.
Although the LCD indicated that it found that no currently existing test has fulfilled all these criteria, it indicated that it will “monitor the evidence and may revise this determination based on the pertinent literature and society recommendations.” In November 2024, we submitted to MolDx our complete clinical evidence package in support of a request for reconsideration of the non-coverage language in the LCD to secure Medicare coverage for EsoGuard.
We are party to a management services agreement with PAVmed (the “MSA”), as well as a payroll benefits and expense reimbursement agreement (the “PBERA”).
PAVmed’s substantial voting interest may discourage a change of control that other holders of our common stock may favor. We are party to a management services agreement with PAVmed (the “MSA”), as well as a payroll benefits and expense reimbursement agreement (the “PBERA”).
EsoCheck is merely offered, free of charge, as a generic esophageal cell collection device, which is FDA 510(k) cleared to be used to collect samples for any diagnostic test. We believe, however, over the long-term, once our commercialization efforts have gained significant traction, it would be useful to jointly market EsoGuard, used with EsoCheck, as a combined product.
This currently is not a significant obstacle to our commercialization efforts, which are almost entirely devoted to marketing EsoGuard. EsoCheck is merely offered, free of charge, as a generic esophageal cell collection device, which is FDA 510(k) cleared to be used to collect samples for any diagnostic test.
In parallel with preparing to submit EsoGuard for Technical Assessment with MolDX, we are aggressively pursuing EsoGuard commercial insurer payment and coverage.
In parallel with our request for reconsideration of the LCD, we are aggressively pursuing EsoGuard commercial insurer coverage and payment.
Healthcare Reform Current and future legislative proposals to further reform healthcare or reduce healthcare costs may result in lower reimbursement for our products, or for the procedures associated with the use of our products, or limit coverage of our products.
Activities that violate the FCPA, even if they occur wholly outside the United States, can result in criminal and civil fines, imprisonment, disgorgement, oversight, and debarment from government contracts. 13 Healthcare Reform Current and future legislative proposals to further reform healthcare or reduce healthcare costs may result in lower reimbursement for our products, or for the procedures associated with the use of our products, or limit coverage of our products.
We protect our proprietary rights through a variety of methods, including confidentiality agreements and/or proprietary information agreements with suppliers, employees, consultants, independent contractors and other entities who may have access to proprietary information. We will generally require employees to assign patents and other intellectual property to us as a condition of employment with us.
We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, and continuing technological innovation, and may rely upon licensing opportunities, to develop and maintain our competitive position. We protect our proprietary rights through a variety of methods, including confidentiality agreements and/or proprietary information agreements with suppliers, employees, consultants, independent contractors and other entities who may have access to proprietary information.
Healthcare Regulation In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing and promotion of drugs and devices, other federal and state laws restrict our business practices.
Healthcare Regulation In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing and promotion of drugs and devices, other federal and state laws restrict our business practices. These laws include, without limitation, anti-kickback and false claims laws, data privacy and security laws, as well as transparency laws regarding payments or other items of value provided to healthcare providers.
We therefore may, when resources permit, pursue FDA PMA approval for EsoGuard, when used on samples collected with EsoCheck, which will allow us to jointly market them as well as provide protection against changes to LDT regulation which could threaten our ability to market EsoGuard as an LDT.
We believe, however, over the long-term, once our commercialization efforts have gained significant traction, it would be useful to jointly market EsoGuard, used with EsoCheck. We therefore may, when resources permit, pursue FDA PMA approval for EsoGuard, when used on samples collected with EsoCheck, which will allow us to jointly market them.
Both studies capture information on the diagnostic and/or therapeutic journey of subjects following EsoGuard testing, and in addition to provider decision impact, will contribute differing levels of clinical outcomes data to the Lucid evidence portfolio. Similarly, results for the Lucid-sponsored virtual-patient study are expected to be ready for analysis in mid-2024.
Both registries capture information on the diagnostic and/or therapeutic journey of subjects following EsoGuard testing, and in addition to provider decision impact, will contribute differing levels of clinical outcomes data to the Lucid evidence portfolio. Manufacturing EsoCheck is currently manufactured for us by our partners Coastline International (“Coastline”), a high-volume device manufacturer, and Sage Product Development.
Our Relationship with PAVmed We are a majority-owned subsidiary of PAVmed, and PAVmed has a controlling financial interest. We continue to depend on PAVmed to provide us various management, technical, research and development, legal, accounting, and administrative services.
(Prior to the completion of such transactions on such date, we were a majority-owned subsidiary of PAVmed.) However, PAVmed remains our largest shareholder based on voting power, and therefore retains the ability to exercise significant influence over Lucid. Moreover, we continue to depend on PAVmed to provide us various management, technical, research and development, legal, accounting, and administrative services.
FDA, however, has generally not enforced these regulatory requirements for most LDTs not in one of these classes and has generally not required these LDTs to undergo FDA premarket review of analytical validity and clinical validity, as all other IVD products must. 7 In October 2023, FDA proposed a policy under which FDA intends to phase out its general enforcement discretion approach for LDTs so that IVDs manufactured by a laboratory would generally fall under the same enforcement approach as other IVDs.
FDA, however, has generally not enforced these regulatory requirements for most LDTs not in one of these classes and has generally not required these LDTs to undergo FDA premarket review of analytical validity and clinical validity, as all other IVD products must. Since only EsoCheck is FDA cleared, we are not permitted to jointly market it with EsoGuard.
Reimbursement and Market Access As noted above, in December 2019, we secured “gapfill” determination for EsoGuard’s PLA code 0114U through the CMS CLFS process. This allowed us to engage directly with Medicare contractor Palmetto GBA and its MolDx Program on CMS payment and coverage.
We have also established an EsoGuard Telemedicine Program, in partnership with UpScript, LLC, an independent third-party telemedicine provider, that accommodates EsoGuard self-referrals from direct-to-consumer marketing. 2 Reimbursement and Market Access As noted above, in December 2019, we secured “gapfill” determination for EsoGuard’s PLA code 0114U through the CMS CLFS process.
For EsoGuard, families are pending that, when granted, will offer additional protections until at least 2037.
For EsoGuard, additional patents have been issued that offer protection until at least 2037.
In March 2024, the Company entered into an eighth amendment to the MSA with PAVmed, increasing the monthly fee due thereunder from $0.75 million to $0.83 million, effective as of January 1, 2024. The eighth amendment to the MSA was executed on March 22, 2024.
Intercompany Agreements with PAVmed On August 6, 2024, PAVmed and the Company entered into a ninth amendment to the management services agreement between PAVmed and Lucid (“MSA”) to increase the monthly fee thereunder from $0.83 million per month to $1.05 million per month, effective as of July 1, 2024.
All of our consulting agreements assign to us all new and improved intellectual property that arise during the term of the agreement. Lucid also has proprietary rights to a range of trademarks, including, among others, Lucid Diagnostics™, LUCID™, EsoCheck®, EsoGuard®, Collect + Protect®, and EsoCheck Cell Collection Device®.
We will generally require employees to assign patents and other intellectual property to us as a condition of employment with us. All of our consulting agreements assign to us all new and improved intellectual property that arise during the term of the agreement.
The U.S. incidence of EAC has increased 500% over the past four decades, while the incidences of other common cancers have declined or remained flat. In nearly all cases, EAC silently progresses until it manifests itself with new symptoms of advanced disease.
In nearly all cases, EAC silently progresses until it manifests itself with new symptoms of advanced disease. EAC is nearly always invasive at diagnosis, and, unlike other common cancers, mortality rates are high even in its earlier stages.
Finally, the “EsoGuard case-control study” (“BE-2”), a Lucid-sponsored clinical validation study, resumed enrollment in 2023 and is expected to continue through 2024. This data will further supplement what has previously been produced by the two NCI-funded studies (Moinova, et al. Sci Transl Med. 2018; BETRNet).
This data will further supplement what has previously been published from the four earlier clinical validation studies from Moinova et. al. (2018), Moinova et. al. (2024), Greer et. al., (2024), and Shaheen et. al. (2024).