Biggest changeUranium Oxide Resources FY 2022 FY 2023 YOY Change Country State/Province Project Measured Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Indicated Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Inferred Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Measured Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Indicated Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Inferred Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) % Change in Measured Pounds % Change in Indicated Pounds % Change in Inferred Pounds United States Wyoming Allemand-Ross 417 42 2,496 417 42 2,496 0% 0% 0% Barge 4,361 4,361 0% Charlie 3,100 988 3,100 988 0% 0% Christensen Ranch 9,596 9,596 0% Clarkson Hill 1,113 1,113 0% Irigaray 5,899 141 5,899 141 0% 0% Jab/West Jab 2,335 392 1,677 2,335 392 1,677 0% 0% 0% Ludeman 5,017 4,697 1,258 5,017 4,697 1,258 0% 0% 0% Moore Ranch 3,210 44 3,210 44 0% 0% Nine Mile Lake 4,308 4,308 0% Red Rim 1,142 1,539 1,142 1,539 0% 0% Reno Creek 12,920 13,070 1,490 12,920 13,070 1,490 0% 0% 0% Wyoming Total 23,899 42,299 15,054 23,899 42,299 15,054 0% 0% 0% Texas Burke Hollow 115 2,209 4,859 115 2,209 4,859 0% 0% 0% Goliad 2,668 3,492 1,225 2,668 3,492 1,225 0% 0% 0% Palangana 643 1,001 643 1,001 0% 0% Salvo 2,839 2,839 0% Texas Total 2,783 6,344 9,924 2,783 6,344 9,924 0% 0% 0% Arizona Anderson 32,055 32,055 0% Workman Creek 4,459 4,459 0% Arizona Total 32,055 4,459 32,055 4,459 0% 0% United States Total 26,682 80,698 29,437 26,682 80,698 29,437 0% 0% 0% Canada Saskatchewan Christie Lake 16,836 16,836 0% Roughrider 27,842 36,043 27,842 36,043 0% 0% Horseshoe-Raven 37,426 37,426 0% Shea Creek 33,175 13,775 33,175 13,775 0% 0% Millennium 11,423 4,364 11,423 4,364 0% 0% Canada Total 109,867 71,019 109,867 71,019 0% 0% Paraguay Yuty 8,962 2,203 8,962 2,203 0% 0% Total Resources 26,682 199,527 102,658 26,682 199,527 102,658 0% 0% 0% Notes: 1.
Biggest changeUranium Oxide Resources FY 2023 FY 2024 YOY Change Country State/Province Project Measured Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Indicated Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Inferred Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Measured Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Indicated Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) Inferred Pounds U 3 O 8 ('000's) % Change in Measured Pounds % Change in Indicated Pounds % Change in Inferred Pounds United States Wyoming Allemand-Ross 417 42 2,496 417 42 2,496 0% 0% 0% Barge 4,361 4,361 0% Charlie 3,100 988 3,100 988 0% 0% Christensen Ranch 9,596 9,596 0% Clarkson Hill 1,113 1,113 0% Irigaray 5,899 141 5,899 141 0% 0% Jab/West Jab 2,335 392 1,677 2,335 392 1,677 0% 0% 0% Ludeman 5,017 4,697 1,258 5,017 4,697 1,258 0% 0% 0% Moore Ranch 3,210 44 3,210 44 0% 0% Nine Mile Lake 4,308 4,308 0% Red Rim 1,142 1,539 1,142 1,539 0% 0% Reno Creek 12,920 13,070 1,490 12,920 13,070 1,490 0% 0% 0% Wyoming Total 23,899 42,299 15,054 23,899 42,299 15,054 0% 0% 0% Texas Burke Hollow 115 2,209 4,859 964 5,191 4,883 738% 135% 0.5% Goliad 2,668 3,492 1,225 2,668 3,492 1,225 0% 0% 0% Palangana 643 1,001 643 1,001 0% 0% Salvo 2,839 2,839 0% Texas Total 2,783 6,344 9,924 3,632 9,326 9,948 31% 47% 0.2% Arizona Anderson 32,055 32,055 0% Workman Creek 4,459 4,459 0% Arizona Total 32,055 4,459 32,055 4,459 0% 0% United States Total 26,682 80,698 29,437 27,531 83,680 29,461 3.2% 3.7% 0.1% Canada Saskatchewan Christie Lake 16,836 16,836 0% Roughrider 27,842 36,043 27,842 36,043 0% 0% Horseshoe-Raven 37,426 37,426 0% Shea Creek 33,175 13,775 33,175 13,775 0% 0% Millennium 11,423 4,364 11,423 4,364 0% 0% Canada Total 109,867 71,019 109,867 71,019 0% 0% Paraguay Yuty 8,962 2,203 8,962 2,203 0% 0% Total Resources 26,682 199,527 102,658 27,531 202,509 102,683 3.2% 1.5% 0% 31 Table of Contents Table 2.6(b) – Year over Year Changes in Titanium (ilmenite- TiO 2 ) Mineral Resources Titanium Oxide Resources FY2023 FY 2024 YOY Change Country Project Measured Tonnes TiO2 (Millions) Indicated Tonnes TiO2 (Millions) Inferred Tonnes TiO2 (Millions) Measured Tonnes TiO2 (Millions) Indicated Tonnes TiO2 (Millions) Inferred Tonnes TiO2 (Millions) % Change in Measured Tonnes % Change in Indicated Tonnes % Change in Inferred Tonnes Paraguay Alto Parana 0 0 0 0 5.32 261.66 0% 100% 100% Notes: 1.
The basin is bounded by the Wyoming thrust belt to the west, the Rawlins Uplift and the Sierra Madre Mountains to the east, the Wind River Mountains to the north and the Uinta Mountains to the south. The GGRB contains up to 25,000 feet of Cretaceous to recent sedimentary rocks.
The basin is bounded by the Wyoming thrust belt to the west, the Rawlins Uplift and the Sierra Madre Mountains to the east, the Wind River Mountains to the north and the Uinta Mountains to the south. The GGRB contains up to 25,000 feet of Cretaceous to recent sedimentary rocks.
Most of the upper Wasatch Formation has been eroded away. The sandstones are arkosic, fine- to coarse-grained with local calcareous lenses. The sandstones contain minor amounts of organic carbon that occurs as dispersed bits or as stringers. Unaltered sandstones are generally gray, while altered sandstones are tan or pink due to hematite, or show yellowish coloring due to limonite.
Most of the upper Wasatch Formation has been eroded away. The sandstones are arkosic, fine- to coarse-grained with local calcareous lenses. The sandstones contain minor amounts of organic carbon that occurs as dispersed bits or as stringers. Unaltered sandstones are generally gray while altered sandstones are tan or pink due to hematite, or show yellowish coloring due to limonite.
Pyrite occurs in several forms within the host sandstones. In unaltered sandstones, pyrite occurs as small to large single euhedral crystals associated with magnetite, ilmenite and other dark detrital minerals. In altered sandstone, pyrite is typically absent, but locally occurs as tarnished, very fine-grained euhedral crystals.
Pyrite occurs in several forms within the host sandstones. In unaltered sandstones, pyrite occurs as small to large single euhedral crystals associated with magnetite, ilmenite and other dark detrital minerals. In altered sandstone, pyrite is typically absent, but locally occurs as tarnished, very fine-grained euhedral crystals.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails” which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails” which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
The sandstones are arkosic, fine- to coarse-grained with local calcareous lenses. The sandstones contain minor amounts of organic carbon that occurs as dispersed bits or as stringers. Unaltered sandstones are generally gray, while altered sandstones are tan or pink due to hematite or show yellowish coloring due to limonite. Pyrite occurs in several forms within the host sandstones.
The sandstones are arkosic, fine- to coarse-grained with local calcareous lenses. The sandstones contain minor amounts of organic carbon that occurs as dispersed bits or as stringers. Unaltered sandstones are generally gray, while altered sandstones are tan or pink due to hematite, or show yellowish coloring due to limonite. Pyrite occurs in several forms within the host sandstones.
In unaltered sandstones, pyrite occurs as small to large single euhedral crystals associated with magnetite, ilmenite and other dark detrital minerals. In altered sandstone, pyrite is typically absent, but locally occurs as tarnished, very fine-grained euhedral crystals. In areas of intense or heavy mineralization, pyrite locally occurs as massive, tarnished crystal aggregates.
In unaltered sandstones, pyrite occurs as small to large single euhedral crystals associated with magnetite, ilmenite and other dark detrital minerals. In altered sandstone, pyrite is typically absent, but locally occurs as tarnished, very fine-grained euhedral crystals. In areas of intense or heavy mineralization, pyrite locally occurs as massive, tarnished crystal aggregates.
Interbedded mudstone, claystone and siltstone are often present and aid in the formation process by focusing groundwater flux. The geometry of mineralization is dominated by the classic roll-front “C” shape or crescent configuration at the redox interface. The highest-grade portion of the front occurs in a zone termed the “nose” within reduced ground just ahead of the alteration front.
Interbedded mudstone, claystone and siltstone are often present and aid in the formation process by focusing groundwater flux. The geometry of mineralization is dominated by the classic roll-front “C” shape or crescent configuration at the redox interface. The highest-grade portion of the front occurs in a zone termed the “nose” within reduced ground just ahead of the alteration front.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails” which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails” which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Interbedded mudstone, claystone and siltstone are often present and aid in the formation process by focusing groundwater flux. The geometry of mineralization is dominated by the classic roll-front “C” shape or crescent configuration at the redox interface. The highest-grade portion of the front occurs in a zone termed the “nose” within reduced ground just ahead of the alteration front.
Interbedded mudstone, claystone and siltstone are often present and aid in the formation process by focusing groundwater flux. The geometry of mineralization is dominated by the classic roll-front “C” shape or crescent configuration at the redox interface. The highest-grade portion of the front occurs in a zone termed the “nose” within reduced ground just ahead of the alteration front.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails” which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails” which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
The formation of roll-front deposits is largely a groundwater process that occurs when uranium-rich, oxygenated groundwater interacts with a reducing environment in the subsurface and precipitates uranium. The most favorable host rocks for roll-fronts are permeable sandstones with large aquifer systems. Interbedded mudstone, claystone and siltstone are often present and aid in the formation process by focusing groundwater flux.
The formation of roll-front deposits is largely a groundwater process that occurs when uranium-rich, oxygenated groundwater interacts with a reducing environment in the subsurface and precipitates uranium. The most favorable host rocks for roll-fronts are permeable sandstones with large aquifer systems. Interbedded mudstone, claystone and siltstone are often present and aid in the formation process by focusing groundwater flux.
The geometry of mineralization is dominated by the classic roll-front “C” shape or crescent configuration at the redox interface. The highest-grade portion of the front occurs in a zone termed the “nose” within reduced ground just ahead of the alteration front.
The geometry of mineralization is dominated by the classic roll-front “C” shape or crescent configuration at the redox interface. The highest-grade portion of the front occurs in a zone termed the “nose” within reduced ground just ahead of the alteration front.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails”, which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails”, which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails” which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Ahead of the nose, at the leading edge of the solution front, mineral quality gradually diminishes to barren within the “seepage” zone. Trailing behind the nose, in oxidized (altered) ground, are weak remnants of mineralization referred to as “tails” which have resisted re-mobilization to the nose due to association with shale, carbonaceous material or other lithologies of lower permeability.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
Tails are generally not amenable to ISR because the uranium is typically found within strongly reduced or impermeable strata, therefore making it difficult to leach.
The Goliad Formation was originally classified as Pliocene in age by most sources, but the formation has been reclassified as early Pliocene to middle Miocene after recent research revealed the presence of indigenous Pliocene-aged mega-fossils occurring in upper Goliad sands, whereas the lower Goliad fluvial sands are correlative with down-dip strata containing benthic foraminifera indicating a Miocene age.
The Goliad Formation was originally classified as Pliocene in age by most sources, but the formation has been reclassified as early Pliocene to middle Miocene after recent research revealed the presence of indigenous Pliocene-aged mega-fossils occurring in upper Goliad sands, whereas the lower Goliad fluvial sands are correlative with down-dip strata containing benthic foraminifera indicating a Miocene age.
No resources are reported in areas outside of the Palangana Project Area boundary. There are no reserves associated with the Palangana Project Area and it is considered a remote ‘satellite’ to the Hobson CPP. Mineral rights for the Project are private (fee) mineral leases, obtained through negotiation with individual mineral owners.
No resources are reported in areas outside of the Palangana Project Area boundary. There are no reserves associated with the Palangana Project Area and it is considered a remote ‘satellite’ to the Hobson CPP. Mineral rights for the Palangana Project are private (fee) mineral leases, obtained through negotiation with individual mineral owners.
The area has long been known to contain uranium oxide, which was first discovered in Karnes County, Texas, in 1954 using airborne radiometric survey. The uranium deposits discovered were within a belt of strata extending 250 miles from the middle coastal plain southwestward to the Rio Grande. This area includes the Carrizo, Whitsett, Catahoula, Oakville and Goliad geologic formations.
The area has long been known to contain uranium oxide, which was first discovered in Karnes County, Texas, in 1954 using airborne radiometric survey. The uranium deposits discovered were within a belt of strata extending 250 miles from the middle coastal plain southwestward to the Rio Grande. This area includes the Carrizo, Whitsett, Catahoula, Oakville and Goliad geologic formations.
Open pit mining began in 1961 and ISR mining was initiated in 1975. The uranium market experienced lower demand and price in the late 1970s and in 1980 there was a sharp decline in all Texas uranium operations.
Open pit mining began in 1961 and ISR mining was initiated in 1975. The uranium market experienced lower demand and price in the late 1970s, and in 1980 there was a sharp decline in all Texas uranium operations.
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, exploration for uranium in South Texas had evolved towards deeper drilling targets within the known host sandstone formations. Deeper exploration drilling was more costly and excluded many of the smaller uranium mining companies from participating in the down-dip, deeper undrilled trend extensions.
During the late 1970s and early 1980s, exploration for uranium in South Texas had evolved towards deeper drilling targets within the known host sandstone formations. Deeper exploration drilling was more costly and excluded many of the smaller uranium mining companies from participating in the down-dip, deeper undrilled trend extensions.
History Uranium exploration and mining in South Texas primarily targets sandstone formations throughout the Coastal Plain bordering the Gulf of Mexico. The area has long been known to contain uranium oxide, which was first discovered in Karnes County, Texas, in 1954 using airborne radiometric survey.
History Uranium exploration and mining in South Texas primarily targets sandstone formations throughout the Coastal Plain bordering the Gulf of Mexico. The area has long been known to contain uranium oxide, which was first discovered in Karnes County, Texas, in 1954 using airborne radiometric survey.
The uranium deposits discovered were within a belt of strata extending 250 miles from the middle coastal plain southwestward to the Rio Grande. This area includes the Carrizo, Whitsett, Catahoula, Oakville and Goliad geologic formations. Open pit mining began in 1961 and ISR mining was initiated in 1975.
The uranium deposits discovered were within a belt of strata extending 250 miles from the middle coastal plain southwestward to the Rio Grande. This area includes the Carrizo, Whitsett, Catahoula, Oakville and Goliad geologic formations. Open pit mining began in 1961 and ISR mining was initiated in 1975.
The uranium market experienced lower demand and price in the late 1970s, and in 1980 there was a sharp decline in all Texas uranium operations. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, exploration for uranium in South Texas had evolved towards deeper drilling targets within the known host sandstone formations.
The uranium market experienced lower demand and price in the late 1970s and in 1980 there was a sharp decline in all Texas uranium operations. During the late 1970s and early 1980s, exploration for uranium in South Texas had evolved towards deeper drilling targets within the known host sandstone formations.
Deeper exploration drilling was more costly and excluded many of the smaller uranium mining companies from participating in the down-dip, deeper undrilled trend extensions. Uranium had been mined by several major oil companies in the past in South Texas, including Conoco, Mobil, Humble (later Exxon), ARCO and others.
Deeper exploration drilling was more costly and excluded many of the smaller uranium mining companies from participating in the down-dip, deeper undrilled trend extensions. Uranium had been mined by several major oil companies in the past in South Texas, including Conoco, Mobil, Humble (later Exxon), ARCO and others.
Mobil had found numerous deposits in South Texas in the past, including the O’Hern, Holiday-El Mesquite and several smaller deposits, mostly in Oligocene-age Catahoula Formation tuffaceous sands. ARCO discovered several Oakville Formation (Miocene-age) uranium-bearing deposits and acquired other deposits located nearby in Live Oak County. They were exploring deeper extensions of Oakville Formation trends when they discovered the Mt.
Mobil had found numerous deposits in South Texas in the past, including the O’Hern, Holiday-El Mesquite and several smaller deposits, mostly in Oligocene-age Catahoula Formation tuffaceous sands. ARCO discovered several Oakville Formation (Miocene-age) uranium-bearing deposits and acquired other deposits located nearby in Live Oak County. They were exploring deeper extensions of Oakville Formation trends when they discovered the Mt.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and have not demonstrated economic viability. 2. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves. 3. All figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. 4.
Mineral resources are not mineral reserves and have not demonstrated economic viability. 2. There is no certainty that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves. 3. Figures are rounded to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimates. 4.
The Saskatchewan Mineral Exploration and Government Advisory Committee has developed the Mineral Exploration Guidelines for Saskatchewan to mitigate environmental impacts from industry activity and facilitate government approval for such activities (SMEGAC, 2016). Applications to conduct an exploration work program need only to address the relevant topics of those listed in the guidelines.
The Saskatchewan Mineral Exploration and Government Advisory Committee has developed the Mineral Exploration Guidelines for Saskatchewan to mitigate environmental impacts from industry activity and facilitate government approval for such activities (SMEGAC, 2016). Applications to conduct an exploration work program need only to address the relevant topics of those listed in the guidelines.
Description of Properties Figure 2.1 – Portfolio Overview of Significant Properties Overview The Company is engaged in conventional and in situ recovery (ISR) uranium extraction and recovery, along with the exploration, permitting and evaluation of uranium properties in the United States, the Republic of Paraguay, and Canada. 19 Table of Contents Summary Disclosure Table 2.1 - Location, Ownership Interest, Operator, Stage, Mining Method, and Mineralization Style Summary Country State/Province Project Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Stage Mining Method Mineralization Style Uranium Projects United States Wyoming Allemand-Ross 43.3101 -105.7787 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Antelope 42.2263 -107.9095 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Barge 43.2729 -105.5905 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Black Hills 44.7764 -104.8831 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Brown Ranch 43.7377 -105.9684 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Bull Springs 42.1584 -107.6305 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Central Shirley Basin 42.3378 -106.4100 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Charlie 43.8274 -106.0594 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Christensen Ranch 43.7982 -106.0235 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Clarkson Hills 42.6593 -106.7006 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Crooks Creek 42.2867 -107.7660 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Crook's Mountain 42.3840 -107.9060 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Crossroads 43.0040 -105.6364 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Cyclone Rim 42.2943 -108.3332 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front East Shirley Basin 42.3192 -106.1616 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Gas Hills 42.7094 -107.6521 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Horse Creek 42.5957 -106.9867 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Irigaray 43.8683 -106.1186 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Jab/West Jab 42.2209/42.2611 -108.0439/-108.1225 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Ludeman 42.9119 -105.6277 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Moore Ranch 43.5652 -105.8480 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Mule Creek 42.2118 -105.8143 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Niles Ranch 43.8024 -105.7961 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Nine Mile Lake 42.9807 -106.3278 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Pine Ridge 43.4591 -106.0725 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Pine Tree U1 43.6173 -105.7860 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Pumpkin Creek 43.8163 -105.8955 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Red Rim 41.6502 -107.5755 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Reno Creek 43.6796 -105.7226 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Ross Flats 43.5224 -105.8861 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Sand Creek 42.7007 -105.2645 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front South Pine Ridge 43.1204 -105.9251 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front South Reno Creek 43.6440 -105.6199 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front 20 Table of Contents Country State/Province Project Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Stage Mining Method Mineralization Style Uranium Projects South Sweetwater 41.9694 -107.9820 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Stewart Creek 43.3124 -105.7342 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Taylor Ranch 43.5578 -106.0098 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Twin Buttes 42.2316 -107.7205 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front West Beaver Rim 42.5967 -108.1568 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front West Crook's Creek 42.2984 -107.8603 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front West Sweetwater 42.1318 -108.0931 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Texas Burke Hollow 27.6756 -97.5176 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Goliad 28.8686 -97.3433 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front La Palangana 28.2638 -98.3959 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Salvo 28.2632 -97.7889 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Longhorn 28.1700 -98.1200 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Arizona Anderson 34.1829 -113.1632 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular Los Cuatros 33.548 -112.322 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular Workman Creek 33.50 -110.57 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular New Mexico C de Baca 34.18 -107.15 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular Dalton Pass 35.40 -108.14 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular Canada Saskatchewan Alexandra 58.023 -109.789 21.05% Orano Canada Inc.
Description of Properties Figure 2.1 – Portfolio Overview of Significant Properties Overview The Company is engaged in conventional and in-situ recovery (ISR) uranium extraction and recovery, along with the exploration, permitting and evaluation of uranium properties in the United States, in Canada and in the Republic of Paraguay. 21 Table of Contents Summary Disclosure Table 2.1 - Location, Ownership Interest, Operator, Stage, Mining Method, and Mineralization Style Summary Country State/Province Project Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Stage Mining Method Mineralization Style Uranium Projects United States Wyoming Allemand-Ross 43.3101 -105.7787 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Antelope 42.2263 -107.9095 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Barge 43.2729 -105.5905 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Black Hills 44.7764 -104.8831 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Brown Ranch 43.7377 -105.9684 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Bull Springs 42.1584 -107.6305 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Central Shirley Basin 42.3378 -106.4100 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Charlie 43.8274 -106.0594 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Christensen Ranch 43.7982 -106.0235 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Clarkson Hills 42.6593 -106.7006 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Crooks Creek 42.2867 -107.7660 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Crook's Mountain 42.3840 -107.9060 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Crossroads 43.0040 -105.6364 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Cyclone Rim 42.2943 -108.3332 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front East Shirley Basin 42.3192 -106.1616 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Gas Hills 42.7094 -107.6521 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Horse Creek 42.5957 -106.9867 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Irigaray 43.8683 -106.1186 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Jab/West Jab 42.2209/42.2611 -108.0439/-108.1225 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Ludeman 42.9119 -105.6277 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Moore Ranch 43.5652 -105.8480 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Mule Creek 42.2118 -105.8143 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Niles Ranch 43.8024 -105.7961 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Nine Mile Lake 42.9807 -106.3278 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Pine Ridge 43.4591 -106.0725 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Pine Tree U1 43.6173 -105.7860 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Pumpkin Creek 43.8163 -105.8955 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Red Rim 41.6502 -107.5755 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Reno Creek 43.6796 -105.7226 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Ross Flats 43.5224 -105.8861 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Sand Creek 42.7007 -105.2645 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front South Pine Ridge 43.1204 -105.9251 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front South Reno Creek 43.6440 -105.6199 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front 22 Table of Contents Country State/Province Project Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Stage Mining Method Mineralization Style Uranium Projects South Sweetwater 41.9694 -107.9820 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Stewart Creek 43.3124 -105.7342 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Taylor Ranch 43.5578 -106.0098 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Twin Buttes 42.2316 -107.7205 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front West Beaver Rim 42.5967 -108.1568 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front West Crook's Creek 42.2984 -107.8603 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front West Sweetwater 42.1318 -108.0931 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Texas Burke Hollow 27.6756 -97.5176 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Goliad 28.8686 -97.3433 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front La Palangana 28.2638 -98.3959 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Salvo 28.2632 -97.7889 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Longhorn 28.1700 -98.1200 100% UEC Exploration Stage ISR Roll-Front Arizona Anderson 34.1829 -113.1632 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular Los Cuatros 33.548 -112.322 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular Workman Creek 33.50 -110.57 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular New Mexico C de Baca 34.18 -107.15 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular Dalton Pass 35.40 -108.14 100% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Tabular Canada Saskatchewan Alexandra 58.023 -109.789 21.05% Orano Canada Inc.
However, considerations of reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction were applied to the mineral resource calculations herein. 82 Table of Contents Table 2.40 – Mineral Resources for the Anderson Project as at the date of this Annual Report Classification Tons Ore (000 ’ s) Tonnes Ore (1000 ’ s) Average Sum Thickness (ft) Average Grade (% eU 3 O 8 ) Pounds eU 3 O 8 (000 ’ s) Measured - - - - - Indicated – Zone A 862 782 3.8 0.111 1,907 Indicated – Zone B 7,347 6,665 9.5 0.108 15,816 Indicated – Zone C 6,211 5,634 10.4 0.094 11,730 Indicated – Zone D 760 689 3.2 0.093 1,421 Indicated – Zone E 911 826 7.6 0.060 1,095 Indicated – Zone F 84 76 4.6 0.051 86 Total M&I 16,175 14,673 8.2 0.099 32,055 Inferred - - - - - Total Resources 16,175 14,673 8.2 0.099 32,055 Notes: 1.
However, considerations of reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction were applied to the mineral resource calculations herein. 85 Table of Contents Table 2.40 – Mineral Resources for the Anderson Project as at the date of this Annual Report Classification Tons Ore (000 ’ s) Tonnes Ore (1000 ’ s) Average Sum Thickness (ft) Average Grade (% eU 3 O 8 ) Pounds eU 3 O 8 (000 ’ s) Measured - - - - - Indicated – Zone A 862 782 3.8 0.111 1,907 Indicated – Zone B 7,347 6,665 9.5 0.108 15,816 Indicated – Zone C 6,211 5,634 10.4 0.094 11,730 Indicated – Zone D 760 689 3.2 0.093 1,421 Indicated – Zone E 911 826 7.6 0.060 1,095 Indicated – Zone F 84 76 4.6 0.051 86 Total M&I 16,175 14,673 8.2 0.099 32,055 Inferred - - - - - Total Resources 16,175 14,673 8.2 0.099 32,055 Notes: 1.
The permitting and licensing requirements in Arizona are similar to other states in the US. ● all exploration and mining activities must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA); and ● required environmental permits and licenses would include but may not be limited to: ● Mine Land Reclamation Plan; Arizona State Mine Inspector; ● Exploration Permit; Arizona State Land Department; ● Plan of Operations; Bureau of Land Management; ● Source Material License; U.S.
The permitting and licensing requirements in Arizona are similar to other states in the US. ● all exploration and mining activities must comply with the National Environmental Policy Act ; and ● required environmental permits and licenses would include but may not be limited to: ● Mine Land Reclamation Plan; Arizona State Mine Inspector; ● Exploration Permit; Arizona State Land Department; ● Plan of Operations; Bureau of Land Management; ● Source Material License; U.S.
Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Uchrich 57.7196 -108.483 30.48% Orano Canada Inc. Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Waterfound River 58.4588 -104.548 12.90% Orano Canada Inc. Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related West Bear 57.8744 -103.975 100.00% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Wheeler River 57.5000 -105.421 5.00% Denison Mines Corp. Development Conventional Unconformity Related Wolly 58.3927 -103.799 6.38% Orano Canada Inc.
Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Uchrich 57.7196 -108.483 30.48% Orano Canada Inc. Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Waterfound River 58.4588 -104.548 12.90% Orano Canada Inc. Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related West Bear 57.8744 -103.975 100.00% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Wheeler River 57.5000 -105.421 5.00% Denison Mines Corp. Development ISR Unconformity Related Wolly 58.3927 -103.799 6.38% Orano Canada Inc.
The Palangana Project Area stratigraphy is horizontal to sub-horizontal, with a 2-to-3-degree southeasterly dip at most. 70 Table of Contents Table 2.33 – Mineral Resources for the Palangana Project as at the date of this Annual Report Classification Tons Ore (000 ’ s) Tonnes Ore (1000 ’ s) Average Grade (% eU 3 O 8 ) Pounds eU 3 O 8 (000 ’ s) Measured - - - - Indicated 232 210 0.134 643.1 Total M&I 232 210 0.134 643.1 Inferred – PA-1 and PA-2 96 87 0.100 192.5 Inferred – Dome, NE Garcia, SW Garcia, CC Brine, Jemison Fence, Jemison East 206 187 0.110 – 0.300 808.8 Total Resources 534 484 0.154 1,644.4 Notes: 1.
The Palangana Project Area stratigraphy is horizontal to sub-horizontal, with a 2-to-3-degree southeasterly dip at most. 72 Table of Contents Table 2.33 – Mineral Resources for the Palangana Project as at the date of this Annual Report Classification Tons Ore (000 ’ s) Tonnes Ore (1000 ’ s) Average Grade (% eU 3 O 8 ) Pounds eU 3 O 8 (000 ’ s) Measured - - - - Indicated 232 210 0.134 643.1 Total M&I 232 210 0.134 643.1 Inferred – PA-1 and PA-2 96 87 0.100 192.5 Inferred – Dome, NE Garcia, SW Garcia, CC Brine, Jemison Fence, Jemison East 206 187 0.110 – 0.300 808.8 Total Resources 534 484 0.154 1,644.4 Notes: 1.
Infrastructure and Local Resources The Project area is undeveloped and there are no facilities or equipment on site, except for various access and drill roads and various water wells previously constructed. No utilities exist on or immediately adjacent to the Project area. Various water wells exist on and near the Project that can support large-scale mining operations.
Infrastructure and Local Resources The Anderson Project Area is undeveloped and there are no facilities or equipment on site, except for various access and drill roads and various water wells previously constructed. No utilities exist on or immediately adjacent to the Project area. Various water wells exist on and near the Project that can support large-scale mining operations.
The Company intends to continue the care and maintenance of the Palangana ISR Project Area, pending restart of uranium recovery operations. There are no significant encumbrances to the property though routine renewals of permits and authorizations is ongoing. No recent regulatory violations or fines have been levied.
The Company intends to continue the care and maintenance of the Palangana Project Area, pending restart of uranium recovery operations. There are no significant encumbrances to the property though routine renewals of permits and authorizations is ongoing. No recent regulatory violations or fines have been levied.
These sands in turn host the K1, K2, K3 and K4 uranium roll-front systems, each of which is composed of multiple stacked individual roll-front deposits. 34 Table of Contents Table 2.8 – Mineral Resources for the Irigaray Project as at the date of this Annual Report Classification Tons Ore (000 ’ s) Tonnes Ore (1000 ’ s) Average Grade (% eU 3 O 8 ) Pounds eU 3 O 8 (000 ’ s) Measured - - - - Indicated 3,881 3,521 0.076 5,899.0 Total M&I 3,881 3,521 0.076 5,899.0 Inferred 104 94 0.068 141.0 Total Resources 3,985 3,615 0.076 6,040.0 Notes: 1.
These sands in turn host the K1, K2, K3 and K4 uranium roll-front systems, each of which is composed of multiple stacked individual roll-front deposits. 36 Table of Contents Table 2.8 – Mineral Resources for the Irigaray Project as at the date of this Annual Report Classification Tons Ore (000 ’ s) Tonnes Ore (1000 ’ s) Average Grade (% eU 3 O 8 ) Pounds eU 3 O 8 (000 ’ s) Measured - - - - Indicated 3,881 3,521 0.076 5,899.0 Total M&I 3,881 3,521 0.076 5,899.0 Inferred 104 94 0.068 141.0 Total Resources 3,985 3,615 0.076 6,040.0 Notes: 1.
Ross Flat X Drilling Notification DN342 Sand Creek X South Pine Ridge X South Reno Creek X South Sweetwater X Stewart Creek X Taylor Ranch X Drilling Notification DN342 Twin Buttes X West Beaver Rim X West Crook's Creek X West Sweetwater X Arizona Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Class III UIC Permit to Mine WDEQ Class 1 Well Permits Source and Byproduct Materials License BLM Plan of Operations WDEQ/EPA Aquifer Exemption Notes Anderson X Los Cuatros X Workman Creek X New Mexico Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Class III UIC Permit to Mine WDEQ Class 1 Well Permits Source and Byproduct Materials License BLM Plan of Operations WDEQ/EPA Aquifer Exemption Notes C de Baca X Dalton Pass X Canada Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Notes Alexandra X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Axis Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Beatty River X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Black Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Brander Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Candle Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Christie Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with resources 26 Table of Contents Christie West X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Close Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Cree Extension X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Diabase Peninsula X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Erica X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Hidden Bay X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Horseshoe-Raven X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Key West X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Laurie X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Millennium X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Mirror River X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Moon Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Moore Tomblin X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Nikita X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Riou Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Roughrider X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Shea Creek X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Uchrich X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Waterfound River X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources West Bear X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Wheeler River X Feasibility Field Test mining completed Wolly X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Kiggavik X Development-Stage, not permitted to mine Paraguay Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Notes Yuty X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Oviedo X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Titanium Projects Paraguay Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Notes Alto Parana X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources 27 Table of Contents Table 2.4 – Processing Plants and other Facilities State/Province Plant Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Status Annual Permitted Production Capacity Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine WDEQ Class 1 Well Permits TCEQ Radioactive Materials License Wyoming Irigaray Central Processing Plant 100% UEC Production Suspended 2.5 Mlb/year X 2 Yes Christensen Ranch Satellite Production Plant 100% UEC Standby 9,000 gpm X 4 Yes State/Province Plant Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Status Annual Permitted Production Capacity Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine TCEQ Class 1 Well Permits TCEQ Radioactive Materials License Texas Hobson Central Processing Plant 28.945 -97.989 100% UEC Production Suspended 4.0 Mlb/year X 2 Yes Our Mineral Properties Below is a table setting out our summary disclosure of current measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resource estimates.
Ross Flat X Drilling Notification DN342 Sand Creek X South Pine Ridge X South Reno Creek X South Sweetwater X Stewart Creek X Taylor Ranch X Drilling Notification DN342 Twin Buttes X West Beaver Rim X West Crook's Creek X West Sweetwater X Arizona Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Class III UIC Permit to Mine WDEQ Class 1 Well Permits Source and Byproduct Materials License BLM Plan of Operations WDEQ/EPA Aquifer Exemption Notes Anderson X Los Cuatros X Workman Creek X New Mexico Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Class III UIC Permit to Mine WDEQ Class 1 Well Permits Source and Byproduct Materials License BLM Plan of Operations WDEQ/EPA Aquifer Exemption Notes C de Baca X Dalton Pass X Canada Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Notes Alexandra X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Axis Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Beatty River X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Black Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Brander Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Candle Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Christie Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Christie West X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Close Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources 28 Table of Contents Cree Extension X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Diabase Peninsula X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Erica X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Henday X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Hidden Bay X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Horseshoe-Raven X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Key West X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Laurie X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Millennium X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Milliken X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Mirror River X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Moon Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Moore Tomblin X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Nikita X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Riou Lake X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Roughrider X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Shea Creek X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Uchrich X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Waterfound River X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources West Bear X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Wheeler River X Feasibility Field Test mining completed Wolly X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Kiggavik X Development-Stage, not permitted to mine Paraguay Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Notes Yuty X Exploration-Stage Project with resources Oviedo X Exploration-Stage Project with no resources Titanium Projects Paraguay Property Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine Notes Alto Parana X Exploration-Stage Project with resources 29 Table of Contents Table 2.4 – Processing Plants and other Facilities State/Province Plant Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Status Annual Permitted Production Capacity Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine WDEQ Class 1 Well Permits WDEQ Radioactive Materials License Wyoming Irigaray Central Processing Plant 100% UEC Production Suspended 2.5 Mlb/year X 2 Yes Christensen Ranch Satellite Production Plant 100% UEC Standby 9,000 gpm X 4 Yes State/Province Plant Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Status Annual Permitted Production Capacity Fully Permitted to Mine Partially Permitted to Mine Not Permitted to Mine TCEQ Class 1 Well Permits TCEQ Radioactive Materials License Texas Hobson Central Processing Plant 28.945 -97.989 100% UEC Production Suspended 4.0 Mlb/year X 2 Yes Our Mineral Properties Below is a table setting out our summary disclosure of current measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resource estimates.
An amendment to the license to increase annual capacity up to 4.0 millons pounds per year was recently approved, so the Hobson CPP is now permitted for production of up to four million pounds per year of uranium concentrates (yellowcake or U 3 O 8 ).
An amendment to the license to increase annual capacity up to 4.0 million pounds per year was recently approved, so the Hobson CPP is now permitted for production of up to four million pounds per year of uranium concentrates (yellowcake or U 3 O 8 ).
However, the actual drilling and geophysical logging results have been determined to be properly conducted according to current industry standards. 72 Table of Contents Table 2.34: Historic Ownership and Operations at the Burke Hollow Project Area Year Company Operations/Activity Amount (No. of Drill holes) Results of Work 1982 Nufuels Original controller of the Burke Hollow Project Area. 18 exploration holes on or nearby the Welder Lease Nufuels drilled 18 exploration holes on or nearby UEC’s 1,825-acre Welder lease in conjunction with a larger regional program, which was conducted by Nufuels.
However, the actual drilling and geophysical logging results have been determined to be properly conducted according to current industry standards. 74 Table of Contents Table 2.34: Historic Ownership and Operations at the Burke Hollow Project Area Year Company Operations/Activity Amount (No. of Drill holes) Results of Work 1982 Nufuels Original controller of the Burke Hollow Project Area. 18 exploration holes on or nearby the Welder Lease Nufuels drilled 18 exploration holes on or nearby UEC’s 1,825-acre Welder lease in conjunction with a larger regional program, which was conducted by Nufuels.
Mineralized thickness ranges from less than five feet to over 20 feet, and the mineralized trend is approximately 5,500 feet long. 64 Table of Contents Table 2.30 – Mineral Resources for the Clarkson Hill Project as at the date of this Annual Report Classification Tons Ore (000 ’ s) Tonnes Ore (1000 ’ s) Average Grade (% eU 3 O 8 ) Pounds eU 3 O 8 (000 ’ s) Measured - - - - Indicated - - - - Total M&I - - - - Inferred 957 868 0.058 1,113.0 Total Resources 957 868 0.058 1,113.0 Notes: 1.
Mineralized thickness ranges from less than five feet to over 20 feet, and the mineralized trend is approximately 5,500 feet long. 66 Table of Contents Table 2.30 – Mineral Resources for the Clarkson Hill Project as at the date of this Annual Report Classification Tons Ore (000 ’ s) Tonnes Ore (1000 ’ s) Average Grade (% eU 3 O 8 ) Pounds eU 3 O 8 (000 ’ s) Measured - - - - Indicated - - - - Total M&I - - - - Inferred 957 868 0.058 1,113.0 Total Resources 957 868 0.058 1,113.0 Notes: 1.
Future requirements with respect to permitting and licensing are with both the federal and provincial governments, the Government of Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment, and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to obtain environmental permits, and construction and operating licenses. 92 Table of Contents Geologic Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit Local geology at the Shea Creek Project Area comprises 400 to 800 meters of Athabasca Group sandstone, which unconformably overlie Lloyd Domain amphibolite-grade granitic and pelitic gneisses.
Future requirements with respect to permitting and licensing are with both the federal and provincial governments, the Government of Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment, and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to obtain environmental permits, and construction and operating licenses. 95 Table of Contents Geologic Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit Local geology at the Shea Creek Project Area comprises 400 to 800 meters of Athabasca Group sandstone, which unconformably overlie Lloyd Domain amphibolite-grade granitic and pelitic gneisses.
While UEC’s conventional projects in Arizona remain at an Exploration Stage, with sufficient price support they would become economic and would be recovered through open pit and/or underground mining methods, benefitting from the proximity to existing power and road infrastructure, and available labor from the nearby city of Phoenix. 78 Table of Contents In the Workman Creek area up to 13 mines were in operation within the Sierra Ancha region.
While UEC’s conventional projects in Arizona remain at an Exploration Stage, with sufficient price support they would become economic and would be recovered through open pit and/or underground mining methods, benefitting from the proximity to existing power and road infrastructure, and available labor from the nearby city of Phoenix. 81 Table of Contents In the Workman Creek area up to 13 mines were in operation within the Sierra Ancha region.
Water will be sourced locally while electrical service will be provided by a regional power company. UEC’s mineral holdings within the Moore Ranch Project Area include three State of Wyoming uranium leases (1,280 acres), 86 unpatented lode claims on federally administered minerals (1,720 acres) and four fee (private) mineral leases (1,180 acres). These mineral holdings comprise 4,180 acres.
Water will be sourced locally while electrical service will be provided by a regional power company. UEC’s mineral holdings within the Moore Ranch Project Area include three State of Wyoming uranium leases (1,280 acres), 86 unpatented lode claims on federally administered minerals (1,720 acres) and four fee (private) mineral leases (1,480 acres). These mineral holdings comprise 4,480 acres.
Kingman (population 24,000) is located approximately 110 miles to the northwest by road. 80 Table of Contents History In January 1955, T.R. Anderson, of Sacramento, California, detected anomalous radioactivity in the vicinity of the Anderson Project Area using an airborne scintillometer. After a ground check revealed uranium oxide in outcrop, numerous claims were staked.
Kingman (population 24,000) is located approximately 110 miles to the northwest by road. 83 Table of Contents History In January 1955, T.R. Anderson, of Sacramento, California, detected anomalous radioactivity in the vicinity of the Anderson Project Area using an airborne scintillometer. After a ground check revealed uranium oxide in outcrop, numerous claims were staked.
Future permit requirements will be permitting and licensing with both the federal and provincial governments, the Government of Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment, and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to obtain environmental permits, and construction and operating licenses. 89 Table of Contents Geologic Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit The Horseshoe-Raven Project Area is located just east of the eastern margin of the Athabasca Basin.
Future permit requirements will be permitting and licensing with both the federal and provincial governments, the Government of Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment, and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to obtain environmental permits, and construction and operating licenses. 92 Table of Contents Geologic Setting, Mineralization, and Deposit The Horseshoe-Raven Project Area is located just east of the eastern margin of the Athabasca Basin.
Data from 323 drill holes totaling 33,491 meters of core and rotary drilling was available and a technical report was completed. 95 Table of Contents Permitting and Licensing In summary, all financial and other obligations related to the mineral concession for the Yuty Project Area have been met. All environmental licenses and permits are in good standing.
Data from 323 drill holes totaling 33,491 meters of core and rotary drilling was available and a technical report was completed. 98 Table of Contents Permitting and Licensing In summary, all financial and other obligations related to the mineral concession for the Yuty Project Area have been met. All environmental licenses and permits are in good standing.
Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related 21 Table of Contents Country State/Province Project Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Stage Mining Method Mineralization Style Uranium Projects Riou Lake 59.0491 -106.156 100.00% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Roughrider 58.3374 -104.021 100.00% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Shea Creek 58.1804 -109.49 49.10% Orano Canada Inc.
Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related 23 Table of Contents Country State/Province Project Location (Latitude) Location (Longitude) Equity Interest Operator Stage Mining Method Mineralization Style Uranium Projects Riou Lake 59.0491 -106.156 100.00% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Roughrider 58.3374 -104.021 100.00% UEC Exploration Stage Conventional Unconformity Related Shea Creek 58.1804 -109.49 49.10% Orano Canada Inc.
Exploration and delineation drilling is conducted under a WDEQ LQD Drilling Notification or the Permit to Mine. There are no materially significant encumbrances on the Charlie Project. Standard encumbrances include reclamation bonding, mining, and surface lease royalties. 56 Table of Contents Geologic setting, Mineralization and Deposit The Charlie Project Area targets mineralization in the Eocene-aged Wasatch Formation.
Exploration and delineation drilling is conducted under a WDEQ LQD Drilling Notification or the Permit to Mine. There are no materially significant encumbrances on the Charlie Project. Standard encumbrances include reclamation bonding, mining, and surface lease royalties. 58 Table of Contents Geologic setting, Mineralization and Deposit The Charlie Project Area targets mineralization in the Eocene-aged Wasatch Formation.
Uranium mineralization at the Anderson Project Area is strata bound and occurs exclusively in the sequence of Miocene-age lacustrine lakebed sediments. The lacustrine sediments unconformably overlie the andesitic volcanic unit over most of the Anderson Project Area. To maintain the mineral tenor, UEC must pay annual claim maintenance fees of $165 per claim, due on September 1 of each year.
Uranium mineralization at the Anderson Project Area is strata bound and occurs exclusively in the sequence of Miocene-age lacustrine lakebed sediments. The lacustrine sediments unconformably overlie the andesitic volcanic unit over most of the Anderson Project Area. To maintain the mineral tenor, UEC must pay annual claim maintenance fees of $200 per claim, due on September 1 of each year.
N/A Ownership transition. 45 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The condition of the property is very good while meeting all standards and requirements of Federal, State and local regulations. There are no immediate plans for exploration or delineation drilling. Facilities, Infrastructure and Underground Development The Ludeman property is fully permitted and licensed for commercial ISR production.
N/A Ownership transition. 47 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The condition of the property is very good while meeting all standards and requirements of federal, state and local regulations. There are no immediate plans for exploration or delineation drilling. Facilities, Infrastructure and Underground Development The Ludeman property is fully permitted and licensed for commercial ISR production.
Jab/West Jab ISR Project The following technical and scientific description for the Jab/West Jab Project area (the “Jab/West Jab Project Area”) is based in part on the TRS titled “S-K 1300 Mineral Resource Report Wyoming Assets ISR Hub and Spoke Project, WY USA”, dated March 31, 2022, as prepared by WWC, a qualified firm (the “QP” herein).
Jab/West Jab ISR Project The following technical and scientific description for the Jab/West Jab Project area (the “Jab/West Jab Project Area”) is based in part on the TRS titled “S-K 1300 Mineral Resource Report Wyoming Assets ISR Hub and Spoke Project, WY USA”, dated March 31, 2022, as prepared by WWC, a qualified firm (the QP herein).
All payments for all claims are up to date. 63 Table of Contents History The initial discovery of mineralization at the Clarkson Hill Claims was made in the 1950s and “small amounts of ore were mined and shipped for treatment from the old pit area located in Section 17, T31N, R82W” (Ljung et al, March 1974).
All payments for all claims are up to date. 65 Table of Contents History The initial discovery of mineralization at the Clarkson Hill Claims was made in the 1950s and “small amounts of ore were mined and shipped for treatment from the old pit area located in Section 17, T31N, R82W” (Ljung et al, March 1974).
At present, UEC is completing an updated economic assessment of the project, as well as camp infrastructure rehabilitation and upgrades. UEC intends to complete additional resource delineation work in the upcoming 2023/2024 fiscal year to further advance the project. The current exploration camp facilities are over 10 years old but remain in good condition.
At present, UEC is completing an updated economic assessment of the project, as well as camp infrastructure rehabilitation and upgrades. UEC intends to complete additional resource delineation work in the upcoming 2024/2025 fiscal year to further advance the project. The current exploration camp facilities are over 10 years old but remain in good condition.
No mine infrastructure or underground development is present on the project. 85 Table of Contents History Between 1969 and 1974, following the discovery of the Rabbit Lake uranium deposit in 1968 by Gulf Minerals Ltd., Numac Oil and Gas (“Numac”) held the large Permit Number Eight over the Midwest Lake (McMahon Lake) and Dawn Lake areas.
No mine infrastructure or underground development is present on the project. 88 Table of Contents History Between 1969 and 1974, following the discovery of the Rabbit Lake uranium deposit in 1968 by Gulf Minerals Ltd., Numac Oil and Gas (“Numac”) held the large Permit Number Eight over the Midwest Lake (McMahon Lake) and Dawn Lake areas.
Christensen Ranch ISR Project The following technical and scientific description for the Christensen Ranch Project area (the “Christensen Ranch Project Area”) is based in part on the TRS titled “S-K 1300 Mineral Resource Report Wyoming Assets ISR Hub and Spoke Project, WY USA”, dated March 31, 2022, prepared by WWC, a qualified firm (the “QP” herein).
Christensen Ranch ISR Project The following technical and scientific description for the Christensen Ranch Project area (the “Christensen Ranch Project Area”) is based in part on the TRS titled “S-K 1300 Mineral Resource Report Wyoming Assets ISR Hub and Spoke Project, WY USA”, dated March 31, 2022, prepared by WWC, a qualified firm (the QP herein).
The point of reference for mineral resources is in-situ at the Project. 6. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
The point of reference for mineral resources is in-situ at the project 6. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 7.
The point of reference for mineral resources is in-situ at the Project. 6. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
The point of reference for mineral resources is in-situ at the project. 6. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. 7.
The next step for the project to advance will likely be a drill program to collect metallurgy for the Horseshoe and Raven deposits in advance of a future economic study. 88 Table of Contents History The Horseshoe-Raven Project Area was initially explored in the late 1960s as part of the greater Rabbit Lake Property after the discovery of the Rabbit Lake Uranium Deposit in 1968.
The next step for the project to advance will likely be a drill program to collect metallurgy for the Horseshoe and Raven deposits in advance of a future economic study. 91 Table of Contents History The Horseshoe-Raven Project Area was initially explored in the late 1960s as part of the greater Rabbit Lake Property after the discovery of the Rabbit Lake Uranium Deposit in 1968.
In order for Christensen Ranch to engage in future uranium extraction, the Company will need to incur capital expenditures to restart idled wellfields. United States Properties Wyoming Properties Below is a map showing our Wyoming projects: Figure 2.2 – Locations of our Projects in Wyoming 30 Table of Contents Permitting Requirements in Wyoming The Irigaray CPP is fully permitted.
In order for Christensen Ranch to engage in future uranium extraction, the Company will need to incur capital expenditures to restart idled wellfields. 32 Table of Contents United States Properties Wyoming Properties Below is a map showing our Wyoming projects: Figure 2.2 – Locations of our Projects in Wyoming Permitting Requirements in Wyoming The Irigaray CPP is fully permitted.
All payments for all claims are up to date. 61 Table of Contents History Uranium mineralization was discovered in the GGRB at the Lost Creek Schoekingerite deposit in the early 1950s. The Schoekingerite deposits were exposed at the surface along the Lost Creek drainage and were located using radiometric surveys. The USGS used shallow exploration to further evaluate the deposits.
All payments for all claims are up to date. 63 Table of Contents History Uranium mineralization was discovered in the GGRB at the Lost Creek Schoekingerite deposit in the early 1950s. The Schoekingerite deposits were exposed at the surface along the Lost Creek drainage and were located using radiometric surveys. The USGS used shallow exploration to further evaluate the deposits.
The table below also summarizes historic drilling and the number of drill holes completed during each period. 67 Table of Contents Table 2.31: Historic Ownership and Operations at the Hobson Project Area Year Company Operations/Activity Amount (No. of Drill holes) Results of Work 1979-1988 Everest Minerals Corporation (later Everest Exploration, Inc. (EEI)) Hobson facility constructed.
The table below also summarizes historic drilling and the number of drill holes completed during each period. 69 Table of Contents Table 2.31: Historic Ownership and Operations at the Hobson Project Area Year Company Operations/Activity Amount (No. of Drill holes) Results of Work 1979-1988 Everest Minerals Corporation (later Everest Exploration, Inc. (EEI)) Hobson facility constructed.
The gneisses have been intruded by syn- to post-peak metamorphic felsic pegmatites, granites, and microgranites of Hudsonian age. These rocks locally contain up to 400 ppm of primary uranium. 86 Table of Contents Proximal to mineralization, graphite in graphitic pelitic gneisses has been consumed by alteration and mineralization; distal to mineralization, the graphite appears to be discontinuous.
The gneisses have been intruded by syn- to post-peak metamorphic felsic pegmatites, granites, and microgranites of Hudsonian age. These rocks locally contain up to 400 ppm of primary uranium. 89 Table of Contents Proximal to mineralization, graphite in graphitic pelitic gneisses has been consumed by alteration and mineralization; distal to mineralization, the graphite appears to be discontinuous.
Figure 2.26 – Location of the Yuty Project 94 Table of Contents Property Description The Yuty Project Area is located in Paraguay, South America. UEC operates the Yuty Project Area through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Transandes Paraguay S.A. (“TPSA”), which holds a 100% interest in the Yuty Mining Exploration and Exploitation Concession (the “Yuty Concession”) Contract (the “Contract”).
Figure 2.26 – Location of the Yuty Project 97 Table of Contents Property Description The Yuty Project Area is located in Paraguay, South America. UEC operates the Yuty Project Area through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Transandes Paraguay S.A. (“TPSA”), which holds a 100% interest in the Yuty Mining Exploration and Exploitation Concession (the “Yuty Concession”) Contract (the “Contract”).
The sum of resource tons and lbs. may not add up to the reported total due to rounding. 2. Measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resources as defined in 17 CFR § 229.1300. 3. Resources estimated using a 0.02% eU 3 O 8 grade cutoff and a 0.1 ft% GT cutoff. 4.
The sum of resource tons and pounds may not add up to the reported total due to rounding. 2. Measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resources as defined in 17 CFR § 229.1300. 3. Resources estimated using a 0.02% eU 3 O 8 grade cutoff and a 0.1 ft% GT cutoff. 4.
N/A Ownership transition. 48 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The condition of the property is good while meeting all standards and requirements of Federal, State and local regulations. There are no immediate plans for exploration or delineation drilling. Facilities, Infrastructure and Underground Development Facilities or wellfields have not been constructed.
N/A Ownership transition. 50 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The condition of the property is good while meeting all standards and requirements of federal, state and local regulations. There are no immediate plans for exploration or delineation drilling. Facilities, Infrastructure and Underground Development Facilities or wellfields have not been constructed.
N/A Ownership transition. 53 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The condition of the property is good while meeting all standards and requirements of Federal, State and local regulations. There are no immediate plans for exploration or delineation drilling. Facilities, Infrastructure and Underground Development Facilities or wellfields have not been constructed.
N/A Ownership transition. 55 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The condition of the property is good while meeting all standards and requirements of federal, state and local regulations. There are no immediate plans for exploration or delineation drilling. Facilities, Infrastructure and Underground Development Facilities or wellfields have not been constructed.
None Oversaw technical reporting and auditing of project resources. 2022 UEC UEC acquired the Nine Mile Lake Project from Anfield. N/A Ownership transition. 59 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The property is in good condition. There are no plans for near term exploration or delineation drilling.
None Oversaw technical reporting and auditing of project resources. 2022 UEC UEC acquired the Nine Mile Lake Project from Anfield. N/A Ownership transition. 61 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The property is in good condition. There are no plans for near term exploration or delineation drilling.
Production from existing wellfields at the Palangana Project ceased in 2016 and the project was put in care and maintenance mode. In order for Palangana to engage in future uranium production, the Company will need to incur capital expenditures to restart idled wellfields. 65 Table of Contents Permitting Requirements in Texas The Hobson CPP is fully permitted.
Production from existing wellfields at the Palangana Project ceased in 2016 and the project was put in care and maintenance mode. In order for Palangana to engage in future uranium production, the Company will need to incur capital expenditures to restart idled wellfields. 67 Table of Contents Permitting Requirements in Texas The Hobson CPP is fully permitted.
Figure 2.23 – Location of the Horseshoe Raven Project Property Description The Horseshoe-Raven Project Area is in the Wollaston Lake area of Northern Saskatchewan, approximately 695 kms north of Saskatoon, southwest of Wollaston Lake. The Horseshoe-Raven Project Area measures approximately 4,486 hectares comprising one mineral claim to which UEX Corporation (“UEX”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UEC, has title.
Figure 2.23 – Location of the Horseshoe Raven Project Property Description The Horseshoe-Raven Project Area is in the Wollaston Lake area of Northern Saskatchewan, approximately 695 kms north of Saskatoon, southwest of Wollaston Lake. The Horseshoe-Raven Project Area measures approximately 4,486 hectares comprising one mineral claim to which UEX, a wholly-owned subsidiary of UEC, has title.
The first production area authorization application has been submitted and 533 exploration and delineation holes have been drilled within PA-2 area as of July 31, 2023. 73 Table of Contents Geologic Setting, Mineralization and Deposit The Burke Hollow Project Area is located in the STUP, which lies along the GMB.
The first production area authorization application has been submitted and 533 exploration and delineation holes have been drilled within PA-2 area as of July 31, 2023. 75 Table of Contents Geologic Setting, Mineralization and Deposit The Burke Hollow Project Area is located in the STUP, which lies along the GMB.
Engineering (“BRS”) under the supervision of Douglas Beahm, PE, PG, and co-authored by Clyde Yancey, PG, then Vice President of Exploration, UEC (collectively, the “QP” herein). The Anderson Project Area does not have mineral reserves and is therefore considered an exploration stage property under S-K 1300 definitions.
Engineering (“BRS”) under the supervision of Douglas Beahm, PE, PG, and co-authored by Clyde Yancey, PG, then Vice President of Exploration, UEC (collectively, the QP herein). The Anderson Project Area does not have mineral reserves and is therefore considered an exploration stage property under S-K 1300 definitions.
N/A Auditing of the Reno Creek Project Area resources. 42 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The condition of the property is good while meeting all standards and requirements of Federal, State and local regulations. Development is in the planning stage with no immediate plans for exploration or delineation drilling.
N/A Auditing of the Reno Creek Project Area resources. 44 Table of Contents Property Condition and Proposed Development The condition of the property is good while meeting all standards and requirements of federal, state and local regulations. Development is in the planning stage with no immediate plans for exploration or delineation drilling.
Most of the leases have term periods of 5 years with a 5-year renewal option. The primary lease stipulation for ISR mining is the royalty payments as a percentage of production. Royalties vary by lease and are confidential. The various lease fees and royalty conditions are negotiated with individual lessors and conditions may vary from lease to lease.
Most of the leases have term periods of five years with a five-year renewal option. The primary lease stipulation for ISR mining is the royalty payments as a percentage of production. Royalties vary by lease and are confidential. The various lease fees and royalty conditions are negotiated with individual lessors and conditions may vary from lease to lease.
There are no reserves associated with the Goliad Project Area. Figure 2.18 – Location of the Goliad Project 74 Table of Contents Property Description The Goliad Project Area is located in South Texas near the northeast end of the STUP. The Goliad Project Area consists of multiple contiguous leases that would allow the mining of uranium by ISR methods.
There are no reserves associated with the Goliad Project Area. Figure 2.18 – Location of the Goliad Project 76 Table of Contents Property Description The Goliad Project Area is located in South Texas near the northeast end of the STUP. The Goliad Project Area consists of multiple contiguous leases that would allow the mining of uranium by ISR methods.
Occasional diabase sills and dikes intrude the sedimentary rocks, such as at the San Antonio area near the village of Yuty. Outcrops are rare, mostly along road cuts, and mapping is done by drilling. 96 Table of Contents The Lower Permian Coronel Oviedo Formation underlies the UPC rocks.
Occasional diabase sills and dikes intrude the sedimentary rocks, such as at the San Antonio area near the village of Yuty. Outcrops are rare, mostly along road cuts, and mapping is done by drilling. 99 Table of Contents The Lower Permian Coronel Oviedo Formation underlies the UPC rocks.