Biggest changeFor example, in the United States, in 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “ACA”), was enacted, which, among other things, subjected biologic products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars; increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by most manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program; extended the Medicaid Drug Rebate program to utilization of prescriptions of individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; subjected manufacturers to new annual fees and taxes for certain branded prescription drugs; created a Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 70% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D; and provided incentives to programs that increase the federal government’s comparative effectiveness research. 47 Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was enacted: • The Budget Control Act of 2011 and subsequence legislation, among other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress that include aggregate reductions of Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year, which remain in effect through 2032.
Biggest changeFor example, in the United States, in 2010 the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the “ACA”), was enacted, which, among other things, subjected 47 biologic products to potential competition by lower-cost biosimilars; increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by most manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program; extended the Medicaid Drug Rebate program to utilization of prescriptions of individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; subjected manufacturers to new annual fees and taxes for certain branded prescription drugs; created a Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 70% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D; and provided incentives to programs that increase the federal government’s comparative effectiveness research.
Furthermore, clinical data from our MAD trial indicate an approximately 50% greater effect on FeNO than has previously been reported for tezepelumab. We have not conducted head-to-head clinical studies of verekitug against tezepelumab, and note that ongoing and future clinical trials for verekitug may produce differing clinical activity and tolerability results.
Furthermore, clinical data from our MAD trial indicate an approximately 50% greater effect on FeNO than has previously been reported for tezepelumab. We have not conducted head-to-head clinical studies of verekitug against tezepelumab, and note that ongoing and future clinical trials for verekitug may produce differing clinical activity and tolerability results.
This effort has resulted in a greater than 6-fold improvement in the concentration of the formulation of verekitug, from 30 mg/mL to 200 mg/mL, which has enabled the ability to employ both a 0.5mL (100 mg) and a 2.0mL (400 mg) SC injection in our severe asthma Phase 2 clinical trial.
This effort has resulted in a greater than 6-fold improvement in the concentration of the formulation of verekitug, from 30 mg/mL to 200 mg/mL, which enabled the ability to employ both a 0.5mL (100 mg) and a 2.0mL (400 mg) SC injection in our severe asthma Phase 2 clinical trial.
An applicant seeking approval to market and distribute a new biological product in the United States generally must satisfactorily complete each of the following steps: • preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies performed in accordance with the FDA’s Good Laboratory Practices (“GLP”) regulations, as applicable; • completion of the manufacture, under cGMP conditions, of the product candidate that the sponsor intends to use in human clinical trials along with required analytical and stability testing; • submission to the FDA of an Investigational New Drug application (“IND”), for human clinical testing, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin; • approval by an independent institutional review board (“IRB”) representing each clinical trial site before each clinical trial site may be initiated; • performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials, in accordance with current Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) and any additional nonclinical studies required to establish the safety and effectiveness of the product candidate for each proposed indication; • preparation and submission to the FDA of a biologics license application (“BLA”), as applicable, requesting approval to market the product candidate for one or more proposed indications, including submission of detailed information on the manufacture and composition of the product and proposed labeling; • review of the product by an FDA advisory committee, where appropriate and as applicable; • satisfactory completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities, including those of third parties, at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with cGMP and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity; • satisfactory completion of any FDA audits of the preclinical studies and clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GLP, as applicable, and GCP, and the integrity of clinical data in support of the BLA; • payment of user fees under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”), unless exempted; 33 • obtaining FDA approval, or licensure, of the BLA; and • compliance with any post-approval requirements, including the potential requirement to implement a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) and any post-approval studies or other post-marketing commitments required by the FDA.
An applicant seeking approval to market and distribute a new biological product in the United States generally must satisfactorily complete each of the following steps: • preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation studies performed in accordance with the FDA’s Good Laboratory Practices (“GLP”) regulations, as applicable; • completion of the manufacture, under cGMP conditions, of the product candidate that the sponsor intends to use in human clinical trials along with required analytical and stability testing; • submission to the FDA of an Investigational New Drug application (“IND”), for human clinical testing, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin; • approval by an independent institutional review board (“IRB”) representing each clinical trial site before each clinical trial site may be initiated; • performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials, in accordance with current Good Clinical Practices (“GCP”) and any additional nonclinical studies required to establish the safety and effectiveness of the product candidate for each proposed indication; • preparation and submission to the FDA of a biologics license application (“BLA”), as applicable, requesting approval to market the product candidate for one or more proposed indications, including submission of detailed information on the manufacture and composition of the product and proposed labeling; • review of the product by an FDA advisory committee, where appropriate and as applicable; • satisfactory completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing facility or facilities, including those of third parties, at which the product, or components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with cGMP and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the product’s identity, strength, quality and purity; 33 • satisfactory completion of any FDA audits of the preclinical studies and clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GLP, as applicable, and GCP, and the integrity of clinical data in support of the BLA; • payment of user fees under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (“PDUFA”), unless exempted; • obtaining FDA approval, or licensure, of the BLA; and • compliance with any post-approval requirements, including the potential requirement to implement a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) and any post-approval studies or other post-marketing commitments required by the FDA.
The federal False Claims Act also permits a private individual acting as a “whistleblower” to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the federal False Claims Act and to share in any monetary recovery; • HIPAA, which created new federal criminal statutes that prohibit a person from knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private) and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters; similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation; • HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (“HITECH”) and their respective implementing regulations, including the Final Omnibus Rule published in January 2013, which impose requirements on certain covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their respective business associates, independent contractors or agents of covered entities, that perform services for them that involve the 46 creation, maintenance, receipt, use, or disclosure of, individually identifiable health information relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information.
The federal False Claims Act also permits a private individual acting as a “whistleblower” to bring actions on behalf of the federal government alleging violations of the federal False Claims Act and to share in any monetary recovery; • HIPAA, which created new federal criminal statutes that prohibit a person from knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or obtain, by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations or promises, any of the money or property owned by, or under the custody or control of, any 46 healthcare benefit program, regardless of the payor (e.g., public or private) and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up by any trick or device a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or representations in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, healthcare benefits, items or services relating to healthcare matters; similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation; • HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 (“HITECH”) and their respective implementing regulations, including the Final Omnibus Rule published in January 2013, which impose requirements on certain covered healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their respective business associates, independent contractors or agents of covered entities, that perform services for them that involve the creation, maintenance, receipt, use, or disclosure of, individually identifiable health information relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information.
During this market exclusivity period, the EMA, the European Commission or the European Union Member States may only grant a marketing authorization to a “similar medicinal product” for the same therapeutic indication as an authorized orphan product if: (i) a second applicant can establish that its product, although similar to the authorized orphan product, is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior; (ii) the marketing authorization holder for the authorized orphan product consents to a second application; or (iii) the marketing authorization holder for the authorized orphan product cannot supply enough orphan medicinal product.
During this market exclusivity period, the European Commission or the European Union Member States may only grant a marketing authorization to a “similar medicinal product” for the same therapeutic indication as an authorized orphan product if: (i) a second applicant can establish that its product, although similar to the authorized orphan product, is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior; (ii) the marketing authorization holder for the authorized orphan product consents to a second application; or (iii) the marketing authorization holder for the authorized orphan product cannot supply enough orphan medicinal product.
In May 2024, we presented full proof-of-concept data from our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1b MAD clinical trial in asthma patients demonstrating that dosing with verekitug led to rapid and complete TSLP receptor occupancy, and 16 reductions in disease-related biomarkers, FeNO and blood eos, that were rapid, substantial and sustained for up to 24 weeks after the last dose.
In May 2024, we presented full proof-of-concept data from our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1b MAD clinical trial in asthma patients demonstrating that dosing with verekitug led to rapid and complete TSLP receptor occupancy, and reductions in disease-related biomarkers, FeNO and blood eos, that were rapid, substantial and sustained for up to 24 weeks after the last dose.
Across multiple experiments, verekitug was found to be at least more than four times more potent based on the IC 50 and IC 90 values for both the Ba/F3 cell proliferation and CCL17 production assays. The IC 90 values from the in vitro assays suggest a target trough concentration of approximately 0.3 µg/mL as an effective dose for verekitug.
Across multiple experiments, verekitug was found to be at least more than four times more potent based on the IC 50 and IC 90 values for both the Ba/F3 cell proliferation and CCL17 production assays. 17 The IC 90 values from the in vitro assays suggest a target trough concentration of approximately 0.3 µg/mL as an effective dose for verekitug.
Chronic inflammation causes structural changes within the lungs, narrowing already small airways and damaging lung parenchyma which causes air sacs to lose functionality and decreases lung elasticity. It is typically caused by long-term exposure to irritants, most often cigarette smoke. People with a history of asthma are also more likely to have COPD.
Chronic inflammation causes structural changes within the lungs, narrowing already small airways and damaging lung parenchyma which causes air sacs to lose functionality and decreases lung elasticity. It is typically caused by long-term exposure to irritants, most often cigarette 5 smoke. People with a history of asthma are also more likely to have COPD.
We believe verekitug has the potential, if approved, to address unmet needs in multiple diseases characterized by TSLP-driven pathobiology due to the high potency and potential for extended dosing intervals that we have observed in our preclinical and clinical development to date. 4 Only one drug targeting the TSLP pathway has been approved for the treatment of severe asthma.
We believe verekitug has the potential, if approved, to address unmet needs in multiple diseases characterized by TSLP-driven pathobiology due to the high potency and potential for extended dosing intervals that we have observed in our preclinical and clinical development to date. Only one drug targeting the TSLP pathway has been approved for the treatment of severe asthma.
These 0.5mL and 2.0mL injection volumes are comparable to or smaller than those of other biologics approved for the treatment of severe asthma, including tezepelumab (1.91mL), dupilumab (2.0mL) and mepolizumab (1.0mL). These process improvements have led to an approximately 35% increase in yield as well, while maintaining comparable product quality.
These 0.5mL and 2.0mL injection volumes are comparable to or smaller than those of other biologics approved for the treatment of severe asthma, including tezepelumab (1.91mL), dupilumab (2.0mL) and mepolizumab 29 (1.0mL). These process improvements have led to an approximately 35% increase in yield as well, while maintaining comparable product quality.
Typically, an advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what 36 conditions, if any. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.
Typically, an advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions, if any. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.
(“Regeneron”), which we refer to as the “Regeneron Letter Agreement.” The Regeneron Letter Agreement relates to a prior Non-Exclusive License and Material Transfer Agreement (the “Terminated Regeneron License Agreement”) that Regeneron and Astellas entered into in March 2007, as amended in July 2010 and subsequently terminated in 31 June 2018, subject to certain surviving rights and obligations of both Regeneron and Astellas.
(“Regeneron”), which we refer to as the “Regeneron Letter Agreement.” The Regeneron Letter Agreement relates to a prior Non-Exclusive License and Material Transfer Agreement (the “Terminated Regeneron License Agreement”) that Regeneron and Astellas entered into in March 2007, as amended in July 2010 and subsequently terminated in June 2018, subject to certain surviving rights and obligations of both Regeneron and Astellas.
In clinical trials, biologics have shown to reduce airway hyperactivity and the number of asthma attacks. They may allow for the reduction or even discontinuation of long-term oral steroid use. Biologics are administered either subcutaneously or intravenously on a bi-weekly, monthly, or bi-monthly basis, depending on the specific product.
In clinical trials, biologics have shown to reduce airway hyperactivity and the number of asthma attacks. They may allow for the reduction or even discontinuation of long-term oral steroid use. Biologics are administered either subcutaneously or intravenously on a bi-weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, or bi-annual basis, depending on the specific product.
Tezepelumab, an approved antibody against TSLP without restriction to patients with only type 2 inflammation, has been shown to have clinical benefits in patients with severe asthma who do not have elevated type 2 biomarkers as with all other approved therapies. 7 Beyond its role in inflammation, TSLP also acts on airway structural cells.
Tezepelumab, an approved antibody against TSLP without restriction to patients with only type 2 inflammation, has been shown to have clinical benefits in patients with severe asthma who do not have elevated type 2 biomarkers as with all other approved therapies. Beyond its role in inflammation, TSLP also acts on airway structural cells.
As a result, we may be unable to meaningfully protect our know-how, trade secrets, and other proprietary information. In addition, we plan to rely on regulatory protection based on orphan drug exclusivities, data exclusivities, and market exclusivities. See the section titled “—Government regulation” below for additional information.
As a result, we may be unable to meaningfully protect our know-how, trade secrets, and other proprietary information. 31 In addition, we plan to rely on regulatory protection based on orphan drug exclusivities, data exclusivities, and market exclusivities. See the section titled “—Government regulation” below for additional information.
Based on its extended dosing interval and effect on broadly accepted disease-associated biomarkers, we believe verekitug, if approved, will be the preferred biologic for the treatment of severe asthma, CRSwNP and COPD. 3 Our current clinical development plan for verekitug is summarized in the pipeline chart below.
Based on its extended dosing interval and effect on broadly accepted disease-associated biomarkers, we believe verekitug, if approved, will be the preferred biologic for the treatment of severe asthma, CRSwNP and COPD. 3 Our current clinical development pipeline for verekitug is summarized in the chart below.
Our commercial success depends in part upon our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for commercially important technologies, inventions and trade secrets related to our business, defend and enforce our intellectual property rights, particularly our patent rights, preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets and operate without infringing valid and enforceable intellectual property rights of others.
Our commercial success depends in part upon our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary protection for commercially important technologies, inventions and trade secrets related to our business, defend and enforce our intellectual 30 property rights, particularly our patent rights, preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets and operate without infringing valid and enforceable intellectual property rights of others.
Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that 45 reimbursement will be available for any product candidate that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement.
Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that reimbursement will be available for any product candidate that we commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement.
Symbols: observed mean values from Phase 1b MAD study; Solid lines: predicted PK from Phase 1 SAD clinical trial in healthy volunteers; LLOQ: lower limit of PK quantification Figure 13: Post-dose serum concentration of verekitug for each Phase 1b MAD cohort, overlayed with PK model based on Phase 1 SAD trial data We demonstrated that dosing with verekitug led to rapid and complete TSLP receptor occupancy and reductions in FeNO and eos that were rapid, substantial and sustained for up to 24 weeks after last dose. 23 The pharmacodynamics of verekitug were assessed over the 32-week observation period by measuring TSLP receptor occupancy in CD14+ monocytes.
Symbols: observed mean values from Phase 1b MAD study; Solid lines: predicted PK from Phase 1 SAD clinical trial in healthy volunteers; LLOQ: lower limit of PK quantification Figure 12: Post-dose serum concentration of verekitug for each Phase 1b MAD cohort, overlayed with PK model based on Phase 1 SAD trial data We demonstrated that dosing with verekitug led to rapid and complete TSLP receptor occupancy and reductions in FeNO and eos that were rapid, substantial and sustained for up to 24 weeks after last dose. 23 The pharmacodynamics of verekitug were assessed over the 32-week observation period by measuring TSLP receptor occupancy in CD14+ monocytes.
Tezepelumab is projected to reach peak global annual sales of over $3.0 billion for severe asthma alone in 2032 and, according to Amgen, achieved more than 20% of new to brand share of prescriptions in the United States in its first commercial year.
Tezepelumab is projected to reach global annual sales of over $3.0 billion for severe asthma alone in 2032 and, according to Amgen, achieved more than 20% of new to brand share of prescriptions in the United States in its first commercial year.
Despite the fact that severe asthma accounts for a small percentage of people with asthma, half of all 11 asthma-related healthcare costs are attributed to their treatment. In the United States, asthma is responsible for $80 billion in annual costs due to care, absenteeism and mortality.
Despite the fact that severe asthma accounts for a small percentage of people with asthma, half of all asthma-related healthcare costs are attributed to their treatment. In the United States, asthma is responsible for $80 billion in annual costs due to care, absenteeism and mortality.
Severe asthma may impact normal daily activities, resulting in missing work or school and can directly impact a person’s quality of life. People with severe asthma often demonstrate significant reduction of their lung function when tested by spirometry or a pulmonary function test.
Severe asthma may impact normal daily activities, resulting in missing work or school and can directly impact a person’s quality of life. People with severe asthma often demonstrate significant reduction of their lung function when tested by spirometry or a 11 pulmonary function test.
The market exclusivity period for the authorized therapeutic indication may, however, be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product no longer meets the criteria for orphan designation, including if the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify market exclusivity.
The market exclusivity period for the authorized therapeutic indication may be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product no longer meets the criteria for orphan designation, including if the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify market exclusivity.
A biologic targeting the TSLP ligand is also in development by Amgen and AstraZeneca (Tezspire). While there are numerous biologics approved for the treatment of severe asthma, tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the TSLP ligand, is the first and only treatment for severe asthma without any biomarker limitation.
A biologic targeting the TSLP ligand is also in development by Amgen and AstraZeneca (Tezspire) for COPD. While there are numerous biologics approved for the treatment of severe asthma, tezepelumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the TSLP ligand, is the first and only treatment for severe asthma without any biomarker limitation.
Unless otherwise required by regulation, the pediatric data requirements do not apply to products with orphan designation. Compliance with cGMP requirements Concurrent with clinical trials, companies must finalize a process for manufacturing the product candidate in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements.
Unless otherwise required by regulation, the pediatric data requirements do not apply to products with orphan designation. 35 Compliance with cGMP requirements Concurrent with clinical trials, companies must finalize a process for manufacturing the product candidate in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements.
To meet the future needs of our business, we may lease additional or alternate space, and we believe suitable additional or alternative space will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms. Legal proceedings From time to time, we may become involved in litigation or other legal proceedings.
To meet the future needs of our business, we may lease additional or alternate space, and we believe suitable additional or alternative space will be available in the future on commercially reasonable terms. 49 Legal proceedings From time to time, we may become involved in litigation or other legal proceedings.
The then-anticipated therapeutic threshold concentration (1.0 µg/mL), conservatively estimated as a 1 ⁄ 2 -log escalation from the 0.3 µg/mL concentration derived from in vitro pharmacology assays, was predicted to be maintained with a 12-week dosing interval. a Projected conservative therapeutic threshold at time of study Figure 10: Simulated PK profiles for repeated SC administration based on Phase 1 SAD clinical trial data Phase 1b MAD clinical trial design We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1b MAD clinical trial of verekitug in asthma patients.
The then-anticipated therapeutic threshold concentration (1.0 µg/mL), conservatively estimated as a 1 ⁄ 2 -log escalation from the 0.3 µg/mL concentration derived from in vitro pharmacology assays, was predicted to be maintained with a 12-week dosing interval. a Projected conservative therapeutic threshold at time of study Figure 9: Simulated PK profiles for repeated SC administration based on Phase 1 SAD clinical trial data Phase 1b MAD clinical trial design We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1b MAD clinical trial of verekitug in asthma patients.
Airway smooth muscle cells express TSLP receptor and when stimulated by TSLP, they increase production of IL-6 and IL-8. Bronchial fibroblasts also produce TSLP and express TSLP receptor. With TSLP receptor signaling, the bronchial fibroblasts produce collagen, a smooth muscle actin, arginase 1 and transforming growth factor b1.
Airway smooth muscle cells express TSLP receptor and when stimulated by TSLP, they increase production of IL-6 and IL-8. Bronchial fibroblasts also produce TSLP and express TSLP receptor. With TSLP receptor signaling, the bronchial fibroblasts produce collagen, a smooth muscle actin, arginase 1 and 7 transforming growth factor b1.
Verekitug inhibited the interaction between TSLP and TSLP receptor in a dose-dependent manner with a 50% inhibitory concentration (“IC 50 ”) of 208 ng/mL and a 90% inhibitory concentration (IC 90 ) of 462 ng/mL. Verekitug also inhibited 17 TSLP-induced proliferation of Ba/F3 cells (IC 50 = 90.7 ng/mL, IC 90 = 200 ng/mL).
Verekitug inhibited the interaction between TSLP and TSLP receptor in a dose-dependent manner with a 50% inhibitory concentration (“IC 50 ”) of 208 ng/mL and a 90% inhibitory concentration (IC 90 ) of 462 ng/mL. Verekitug also inhibited TSLP-induced proliferation of Ba/F3 cells (IC 50 = 90.7 ng/mL, IC 90 = 200 ng/mL).
Factors payors consider in determining reimbursement are based on whether the product is: • a covered benefit under its health plan; • safe, effective and medically necessary; • appropriate for the specific patient; • cost-effective; and • neither experimental nor investigational.
Factors payors consider in determining reimbursement are based on whether the product is: • a covered benefit under its health plan; • safe, effective and medically necessary; 45 • appropriate for the specific patient; • cost-effective; and • neither experimental nor investigational.
Failure to respond to a complete response letter may be considered by the FDA as a request to withdraw the application. The FDA may refer applications for novel products or products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee.
Failure to respond to a complete response letter may be considered by the FDA as a request to withdraw the application. 36 The FDA may refer applications for novel products or products that present difficult questions of safety or efficacy to an advisory committee.
The IRB will consider, among other things, clinical trial design, patient informed consent, ethical factors, the safety of human subjects and the possible liability of the institution. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA regulations.
The IRB will consider, among other things, clinical trial design, patient informed consent, ethical factors, the safety of human subjects and the possible liability of the institution. An IRB must operate in compliance with 34 FDA regulations.
Importantly, a dedicated EMA contact and rapporteur from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”) are appointed early in the PRIME scheme facilitating increased understanding of the product at the EMA’s committee level.
Importantly, a dedicated EMA contact and a rapporteur from the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (“CHMP”) are typically appointed early in the PRIME scheme facilitating increased understanding of the product at the EMA’s committee level.
If a product designated as an orphan drug ultimately receives marketing approval for an indication broader than what was designated in its orphan drug application, it may not be entitled to exclusivity.
If a product designated as an orphan drug ultimately receives marketing approval for an indication broader than what was designated in its orphan drug application, it may not be entitled to exclusivity for that broader indication.
We also compete with these 29 organizations to recruit management, scientists and clinical development personnel, and our inability to compete successfully could negatively affect our level of expertise and our ability to execute our business plan.
We also compete with these organizations to recruit management, scientists and clinical development personnel, and our inability to compete successfully could negatively affect our level of expertise and our ability to execute our business plan.
Similar to asthma and CRSwNP, 15 biologics are also being developed as new and potentially transformative treatments, and recently, dupilumab became the first biologic approved for the treatment of COPD.
Similar to asthma and CRSwNP, biologics are also being developed as new and potentially transformative treatments, and recently, dupilumab became the first biologic approved for the treatment of COPD.
However, given serum concentrations for the first three cohorts remained above the projected therapeutic threshold, a single dose administration (25 mg) cohort was included to generate data in support of PK/PD. 22 As shown in Figure 13, observed mean serum concentrations from the Phase 1b MAD study replicated the modeled PK from the Phase 1 SAD clinical trial in healthy volunteers.
However, given serum concentrations for the first three cohorts remained above the projected therapeutic threshold, a single dose administration (25 mg) cohort was included to generate data in support of PK/PD. 22 As shown in Figure 12, observed mean serum concentrations from the Phase 1b MAD study replicated the modeled PK from the Phase 1 SAD clinical trial in healthy volunteers.
To help reduce the risk of introduction of adventitious agents with the use of biological products, the PHSA emphasizes the importance of manufacturing controls for products with attributes that cannot be 35 precisely defined.
To help reduce the risk of introduction of adventitious agents with the use of biological products, the PHSA emphasizes the importance of manufacturing controls for products with attributes that cannot be precisely defined.
Figure 8: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events by cohort Phase 1 SAD clinical trial PK data In the six IV cohorts, there was a linear and dose-proportional increase in maximum serum concentration (“C max ”) and total drug exposure over time (area under the curve) over the 0.1-10 mg/kg dose range.
Figure 7: Incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events by cohort Phase 1 SAD clinical trial PK data In the six IV cohorts, there was a linear and dose-proportional increase in maximum serum concentration (“C max ”) and total drug exposure over time (area under the curve) over the 0.1-10 mg/kg dose range.
Of the more than 50 million people diagnosed with asthma in these major markets, it is estimated that only 440,000 patients are treated with biologics currently, or less than 20% of eligible patients. This creates a significant opportunity for a biologic that meets patients’ needs in terms of efficacy and the reduced burden of a longer dosing interval.
Of the more than 50 million people diagnosed with asthma in these major markets, it is estimated that only 440,000 patients are treated with biologics currently, or less than 25% of eligible patients. This creates a significant opportunity for a biologic that meets patients’ needs in terms of efficacy and the reduced burden of a longer dosing interval.
Any patents that we hold may be challenged, circumvented or invalidated by third parties. Verekitug program We own 12 patent families directed to verekitug. A first patent family is directed to compositions of matter of verekitug and methods of using the same for treating asthma and expire in 2034, without taking any potential patent term extension into account.
Any patents that we hold may be challenged, circumvented or invalidated by third parties. Verekitug program We own 6 patent families directed to verekitug. A first patent family is directed to compositions of matter of verekitug and methods of using the same for treating asthma and expire in 2034, without taking any potential patent term extension into account.
As summarized in Figure 14 below, the first three cohorts (verekitug doses ≥100 mg) had substantial occupancy through the end of the observation period. The fourth single low dose cohort, added to interrogate the minimal concentration required to maintain full receptor saturation, produced substantial occupancy for 12 to 16 weeks supporting the high potency of verekitug at low doses.
As summarized in Figure 13 below, the first three cohorts (verekitug doses ≥100 mg) had substantial occupancy through the end of the observation period. The fourth single low dose cohort, added to interrogate the minimal concentration required to maintain full receptor saturation, produced substantial occupancy for 12 to 16 weeks supporting the high potency of verekitug at low doses.
Figure 9 below illustrates the PK profiles for the six IV cohorts and one SC cohort in our Phase 1 SAD trial. a Projected conservative therapeutic threshold at time of study Figure 9: Single dose PK profiles for six IV cohorts and one SC cohort 20 Data from the SC cohort showed the absolute bioavailability after a dose of 1 mg/kg of verekitug was approximately 70%.
Figure 8 below illustrates the PK profiles for the six IV cohorts and one SC cohort in our Phase 1 SAD trial. a Projected conservative therapeutic threshold at time of study Figure 8: Single dose PK profiles for six IV cohorts and one SC cohort 20 Data from the SC cohort showed the absolute bioavailability after a dose of 1 mg/kg of verekitug was approximately 70%.
Figure 12: Treatment emergent adverse events observed in Phase 1b MAD clinical trial PK/PD data demonstrated substantial and sustained receptor occupancy and biomarker suppression, supporting dosing intervals of up to Q24W We observed a desirable pharmacokinetics profile for verekitug that is supportive of extended dosing intervals up to every 24 weeks.
Figure 11: Treatment emergent adverse events observed in Phase 1b MAD clinical trial PK/PD data demonstrated substantial and sustained receptor occupancy and biomarker suppression, supporting dosing intervals of up to q24w We observed a desirable pharmacokinetics profile for verekitug that is supportive of extended dosing intervals up to every 24 weeks.
FDA approved biologic treatments Mechanism of action Type of asthma Dosing interval Omalizumab / Xolair Anti-IgE Moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma 2 or 4 weeks Dupilumab / Dupixent Blocks IL-4 and IL-13 Moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma 2 weeks Mepolizumab / NUCALA Blocks IL-5 Severe eosinophilic asthma 4 weeks Reslizumab / Cinqair 4 weeks (IV) Benralizumab / Fasenra 8 weeks Tezepelumab / Tezspire Blocks TSLP Severe asthma (without restriction to type 2 patients only) 4 weeks Table 1: Overview of FDA approved biologic treatments for asthma Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the TSLP ligand and prevents its interaction with the TSLP receptor.
FDA approved biologic treatments Mechanism of action Type of asthma Dosing interval Omalizumab / Xolair Anti-IgE Moderate to severe persistent allergic asthma 2 or 4 weeks Dupilumab / Dupixent Blocks IL-4 and IL-13 Moderate to severe eosinophilic asthma 2 weeks Mepolizumab / Nucala Blocks IL-5 Severe eosinophilic asthma 4 weeks Reslizumab / Cinqair 4 weeks (IV) Benralizumab / Fasenra 8 weeks Depemokimab / Exdensur 26 weeks Tezepelumab / Tezspire Blocks TSLP Severe asthma (without restriction to type 2 patients only) 4 weeks Table 1: Overview of FDA approved biologic treatments for asthma Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal antibody that binds to the TSLP ligand and prevents its interaction with the TSLP receptor.
As of March 5, 2025, this first patent family has two issued U.S. patents, 20 issued patents in foreign jurisdictions, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, a European patent (validated in Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Switzerland, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Spain, Finland, France, Great Britain, Greece, Hungary, Croatia, Ireland, Iceland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Monaco, Malta, Macedonia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Sweden, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Turkey), Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, 30 Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, Ukraine, Vietnam and South Africa, and one pending application in Thailand.
As of March 20, 2026, this first patent family has two issued U.S. patents, 20 issued patents in foreign jurisdictions, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, a European patent (validated in Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Switzerland, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Germany, Denmark, Estonia, Spain, Finland, France, Great Britain, Greece, Hungary, Croatia, Ireland, Iceland, Italy, Liechtenstein, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Monaco, Malta, Macedonia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Sweden, Slovenia, Slovakia, and Turkey), Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, Ukraine, Vietnam and South Africa, and one pending application in Thailand.
The major asthma markets, including the United States, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom (“UK”) and Japan, have estimated annual sales of approximately $7.5 billion for 2023 with a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of approximately 5.9% through 2032. The United States alone is estimated to have approximately $6.0 billion in asthma market sales for 2023.
The major asthma markets, including the United States, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom (“UK”) and Japan, have estimated annual sales of approximately $7.5 billion for 2023 with a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of approximately 5.9% through 2032. The United States alone was estimated to have approximately $6.0 billion in asthma market sales for 2023.
The centralized procedure is optional for products containing a new active substance not yet authorized in the European Union, or for products that constitute a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or which are in the interest of public health in the European Union. Manufacturers must demonstrate the quality, safety and efficacy of their products to the EMA.
The centralized procedure is optional for products containing a new active substance not yet authorized in the European Union, or for products that constitute a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation or which are in the interest of public health in the European Union. Applicants must demonstrate the quality, safety and efficacy of their products to the EMA.
Our code of business conduct and ethics, corporate governance guidelines and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on our corporate website. 49
Our code of business conduct and ethics, corporate governance guidelines and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are available on our corporate website.
Table 1 below identifies FDA-approved biologic treatments for asthma and each product’s mechanism of action, 10 specific asthma indication and dosing interval. Despite the efficacy shown in clinical trials, it is estimated that less than 20% of people with severe asthma receive biologic treatment.
Table 1 below identifies FDA-approved biologic treatments for asthma and each product’s 10 mechanism of action, specific asthma indication and dosing interval. Despite the efficacy shown in clinical trials, it is estimated that less than 25% of people with severe asthma receive biologic treatment.
Figure 5: Verekitug neutralizes TSLP, a cytokine upstream of those targeted by existing biologics Preclinical data Target engagement and inhibition In preclinical studies conducted by Astellas, which were not designed to support formal statistical comparisons, verekitug was able to efficiently bind and inhibit the TSLP receptor.
Figure 4: Verekitug neutralizes TSLP, a cytokine upstream of those targeted by existing biologics Preclinical data Target engagement and inhibition In preclinical studies conducted by Astellas, which were not designed to support formal statistical comparisons, verekitug was able to efficiently bind and inhibit the TSLP receptor.
Clinical data Phase 1 SAD clinical trial design Verekitug was investigated in a Phase 1 SAD clinical trial conducted by Astellas, which enrolled 56 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 55. The primary objective of the study was safety, tolerability and PK following single intravenous (“IV”) and subcutaneous (“SC”) doses of verekitug.
Phase 1 clinical trials Phase 1 SAD clinical trial design Verekitug was investigated in a Phase 1 SAD clinical trial conducted by Astellas, which enrolled 56 healthy volunteers aged 18 to 55. The primary objective of the study was safety, tolerability and PK following single intravenous (“IV”) and subcutaneous (“SC”) doses of verekitug.
As summarized in Figure 8 below, treatment-emergent adverse events (“TEAEs”) were reported by 21 of 42 participants receiving verekitug (50%) and 3 of 14 (21%) participants receiving placebo. The majority of TEAEs were mild in severity and less than half of all reported TEAEs were considered to be related to the study drug.
As summarized in Figure 7 below, treatment-emergent adverse events (“TEAEs”) were reported by 21 of 42 participants receiving verekitug (50%) and 3 of 14 (21%) participants receiving placebo. The majority of TEAEs were mild in severity and less than half of all reported TEAEs were considered to be related to the study drug.
These results, as shown in Figure 6 below, underscore the potency of verekitug and the potential for sufficient efficacy even at low drug concentrations. Figure 6: Left panel: In a competitive ELISA study, verekitug was shown to inhibit the interaction between TSLP and TSLP receptor in a dose-dependent manner.
These results, as shown in Figure 5 below, underscore the potency of verekitug and the potential for sufficient efficacy even at low drug concentrations. Figure 5: Left panel: In a competitive ELISA study, verekitug was shown to inhibit the interaction between TSLP and TSLP receptor in a dose-dependent manner.
PD, pharmacodynamics; PK, pharmacokinetics; SC, subcutaneous; PBO, placebo 21 Figure 11: Trial design schematic for Phase 1b MAD trial Phase 1b MAD safety and tolerability data Similar to the Phase 1 SAD clinical trial, the data from the Phase 1b MAD clinical trial showed a favorable tolerability profile for verekitug at all dose levels.
PD, pharmacodynamics; PK, pharmacokinetics; SC, subcutaneous; PBO, placebo 21 Figure 10: Trial design schematic for Phase 1b MAD trial Phase 1b MAD safety and tolerability data Similar to the Phase 1 SAD clinical trial, the data from the Phase 1b MAD clinical trial showed a favorable tolerability profile for verekitug at all dose levels.
Figure 7: Trial design schematic for Phase 1 SAD trial Phase 1 SAD clinical trial safety and tolerability data We presented the results from the Phase 1 SAD clinical trial of verekitug at the ATS International Conference in May 2023. The data showed a favorable tolerability profile at all dose levels in healthy participants.
Figure 6: Trial design schematic for Phase 1 SAD trial Phase 1 SAD clinical trial safety and tolerability data We presented the results from the Phase 1 SAD clinical trial of verekitug at the ATS International Conference in May 2023. The data showed a favorable tolerability profile at all dose levels in healthy participants.
As summarized in Figure 12 below, TEAEs were reported by 21 of 24 (87.5%) participants receiving verekitug and 7 of 8 (87.5%) patients receiving placebo. TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity with no severe TEAEs reported. Over 90% of the TEAEs were deemed unrelated to study drug.
As summarized in Figure 11 below, TEAEs were reported by 21 of 24 (87.5%) participants receiving verekitug and 7 of 8 (87.5%) patients receiving placebo. TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity with no severe TEAEs reported. Over 90% of the TEAEs were deemed unrelated to study drug.
The final cohort was a 1 mg/kg SC dose. Figure 7 below summarizes the Phase 1 SAD trial design. BMI, body mass index; IV, intravenous; PD, pharmacodynamics; PK, pharmacokinetics; R, randomization; SC, subcutaneous; ULN, upper limit of normal.
The final cohort was a 1 mg/kg SC dose. Figure 6 below summarizes the Phase 1 SAD trial design. BMI, body mass index; IV, intravenous; PD, pharmacodynamics; PK, pharmacokinetics; R, randomization; SC, subcutaneous; ULN, upper limit of normal.
The final cohort was a single low dose of 25 mg subcutaneously. The 32-week trial included an observation period of up to 24 weeks after the last dose in the multi-dose cohorts. Figure 11 below summarizes this trial design.
The final cohort was a single low dose of 25 mg subcutaneously. The 32-week trial included an observation period of up to 24 weeks after the last dose in the multi-dose cohorts. Figure 10 below summarizes this trial design.
Much like the Anti-Kickback Statue prohibition in the United States, the provision of benefits or advantages to physicians to induce or encourage the prescription, recommendation, endorsement, purchase, supply, order or use of medicinal products is also prohibited in the European Union.
Much like the Anti-Kickback Statute prohibition in the United States, the provision of benefits or advantages to physicians to induce or encourage the prescription, recommendation, endorsement, purchase, supply, order or use of medicinal products is also prohibited in the European Union.
An orphan designation provides a number of benefits, including fee reductions, regulatory assistance and the possibility to apply for a centralized marketing authorization. Marketing authorization for an orphan product leads to a ten-year period of market exclusivity being granted following marketing approval of the orphan product.
An orphan designation provides a number of benefits, including fee reductions, regulatory assistance and the possibility to apply for a centralized marketing authorization. Marketing authorization for an orphan product leads to a ten-year period of market exclusivity following marketing approval of the orphan product.
Dupilumab’s effect on FeNO has been observed to be similar to that of tezepelumab, at an approximately -27% change from baseline, whereas mepolizumab has been observed to have no effect on FeNO. These data are presented for reference purposes only and do not represent results of head-to-head comparative studies among these product candidates or relative to verekitug.
Dupilumab’s effect on FeNO was observed to be similar to that of tezepelumab, at an approximately -27% change from baseline, whereas mepolizumab was observed to have no effect on FeNO. These data are presented for reference purposes only and do not represent results of head-to-head comparative studies among these product candidates or relative to verekitug.
For this reason, these doses are being tested in our Phase 2 trial in severe asthma. Figure 18: PK simulations of verekitug. Solid line = median, Shadow = 5-95 percentile prediction range Japan PK trial We also completed a third Phase 1 clinical trial of verekitug to support clinical development in Japan and other Asian countries.
For this reason, these doses were tested in our Phase 2 trial in severe asthma. Figure 18: PK simulations of verekitug. Solid line = median, Shadow = 5-95 percentile prediction range Japan PK trial We also completed a third Phase 1 clinical trial of verekitug to support clinical development in Japan and other Asian countries.
Accelerated evaluation may be granted by the CHMP in exceptional cases, when a medicinal product is of major interest from the point of view of public health and, in particular, from the viewpoint of therapeutic innovation.
Accelerated assessment may be granted by the CHMP in exceptional cases, when a medicinal product is of major interest from the point of view of public health and, in particular, from the viewpoint of therapeutic innovation.
Exclusive license agreement with Maruho In October 2021, we entered into a license agreement with Maruho Co., Ltd. (“Maruho”), as amended on May 30, 2023, which we refer to as the “Maruho License Agreement,” under which we granted to Maruho an exclusive, irrevocable, perpetual, royalty-free, sublicensable (subject to our right of first negotiation as described below) license.
Exclusive license agreement with Maruho In October 2021, we entered into a license agreement with Maruho Co., Ltd. (“Maruho”), as amended on May 30, 2023 (the “Maruho License Agreement”), under which we granted to Maruho an exclusive, irrevocable, perpetual, royalty-free, sublicensable (subject to our right of first negotiation as described below) license.
A PK model fitted to the single dose SC PK data was used to predict the PK profiles after repeat SC administration at different dose levels and dose intervals, as illustrated in Figure 10 below.
A PK model fitted to the single dose SC PK data was used to predict the PK profiles after repeat SC administration at different dose levels and dose intervals, as illustrated in Figure 9 below.
All cohorts demonstrated 100% TSLP receptor occupancy by verekitug within two weeks after first dose. Figure 14: Percent of free TSLP receptors for each Phase 1b MAD cohort compared to placebo over 32 weeks 24 As shown in Figures 15A and 15B below, reductions in blood eos and FeNO levels were rapid, substantial and sustained.
All cohorts demonstrated 100% TSLP receptor occupancy by verekitug within two weeks after first dose. Figure 13: Percent of free TSLP receptors for each Phase 1b MAD cohort compared to placebo over 32 weeks 24 As shown in Figures 14 and 15 below, reductions in blood eos and FeNO levels were rapid, substantial and sustained.
Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. Existing therapeutics for asthma include controller medications, reliever medications and more recently, biologics from Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”) and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Novartis”) (Xolair), Sanofi and Regeneron (Dupixent), GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”) (Nucala), AstraZeneca (Fasenra), and Amgen and AstraZeneca (Tezspire).
Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. Existing therapeutics for asthma include controller medications, reliever medications and more recently, biologics from Genentech, Inc. (“Genentech”) and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Novartis”) (Xolair), Sanofi and Regeneron (Dupixent), GSK (Nucala), GSK (Exdensur), AstraZeneca (Fasenra), and Amgen and AstraZeneca (Tezspire).
Figure 15A: Levels of blood eosinophils compared to baseline for each cohort in Phase 1b MAD trial over 32 weeks 25 Figure 15B: Levels of fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (right column) compared to baseline for each cohort in the Phase 1b MAD trial over 32 weeks Patients receiving verekitug doses of 100 mg or greater experienced reductions in blood eos of up to 52% and FeNO reductions of up to 49% at 32 weeks.
Figure 14: Levels of blood eosinophils compared to baseline for each cohort in Phase 1b MAD trial over 32 weeks 25 Figure 15: Levels of fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (right column) compared to baseline for each cohort in the Phase 1b MAD trial over 32 weeks Patients receiving verekitug doses of 100 mg or greater experienced reductions in blood eos of up to 52% and FeNO reductions of up to 49% at 32 weeks.
Nasal polyps are associated with significant morbidity and debilitating symptoms; it is estimated that 40% to 45% of people with severe asthma also have CRSwNP and that up to 65% of people with CRSwNP also have asthma, demonstrating a strong association between the two conditions. The current treatment options for patients with CRSwNP are corticosteroids, surgery and, more recently, biologics.
Nasal polyps are associated with significant morbidity and debilitating symptoms; it is estimated that more than 40% of people with severe asthma also have CRSwNP and that up to 70% of people with CRSwNP also have asthma, demonstrating a strong association between the two conditions. The current treatment options for patients with CRSwNP are corticosteroids, surgery and, more recently, biologics.
The projections for tezepelumab’s peak sales are not indicative of the potential market opportunity for verekitug and are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause them to be smaller than currently estimated.
The projections for tezepelumab’s global annual sales are not indicative of the potential market opportunity for verekitug and are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause them to be smaller than currently estimated.
Existing therapeutics for CRSwNP include topical corticosteroids, nasal saline irrigations and more recently, biologics from Genentech and Novartis (Xolair), Sanofi and Regeneron (Dupixent) and GSK (Nucala). Existing therapeutics for COPD include inhaled steroids and bronchodilator inhalers and more recently, a biologic from Sanofi and Regeneron (Dupixent).
Existing therapeutics for CRSwNP include topical corticosteroids, nasal saline irrigations and more recently, biologics from Genentech and Novartis (Xolair), Sanofi and Regeneron (Dupixent), GSK (Nucala), and Amgen and AstraZeneca (Tezspire). Existing therapeutics for COPD include inhaled steroids and bronchodilator inhalers and more recently, a biologic from Sanofi and Regeneron (Dupixent) and GSK (Nucala).
Dupilumab (Q2W), mepolizumab (Q4W), reslizumab (Q4W) and benralizumab (Q8W) are biologics that target cytokines acting downstream of the TSLP receptor.
Dupilumab (q2w), mepolizumab (q4w), reslizumab (q4w), benralizumab (q8w), and depemokimab (q26w) are biologics that target cytokines acting downstream of the TSLP receptor.
Of the 900,000 people diagnosed with CRSwNP in the United States, major European markets and Japan, it is estimated that approximately 200,000 adults are eligible for biologics. 14 We believe there is a significant opportunity for additional biologic entrants into this market given the large unmet medical need that remains as many people with CRSwNP continue to live with uncontrolled symptoms despite surgery, as shown in Figure 4, and corticosteroid treatment.
Of the 900,000 people diagnosed with CRSwNP in the United States, major European markets and Japan, it is estimated that approximately 300,000 adults are eligible for biologics in the United States alone. 14 We believe there is a significant opportunity for additional biologic entrants into this market given the large unmet medical need that remains as many people with CRSwNP continue to live with uncontrolled symptoms despite surgery, and corticosteroid treatment.
In the past several years, six biologic treatments for asthma have been approved by the FDA and five of these have achieved or are projected to achieve greater than $1.0 billion in annual sales by 2025, underscoring the need for new treatments and the large size of the market.
In the past several years, seven biologic treatments for asthma have been approved by the FDA and six of these have achieved or are projected to achieve greater than $1.0 billion in annual sales by 2026, underscoring the need for new treatments and the large size of the market.
Market opportunity for COPD Millions of people worldwide continue to suffer from COPD despite currently available treatments, underscoring the large need for more effective treatments for this patient population. Dupilumab, is currently the only biologic approved for the treatment of COPD and others are in late-stage clinical development.
Market opportunity for COPD Millions of people worldwide continue to suffer from COPD despite currently available treatments, underscoring the large need for more effective treatments for this patient population. Dupilumab and Mepolizumab are currently the only biologics approved for the treatment of COPD, and others are in late-stage clinical development.
Verekitug is, to our knowledge, the only monoclonal antibody currently in clinical development that targets the TSLP receptor. We believe these characteristics will translate into a differentiated profile, including improved clinical outcomes, substantially extended dosing intervals, and the potential to treat for a broad spectrum of TSLP-driven inflammatory diseases.
Verekitug is, to our knowledge, the only monoclonal antibody currently in clinical development that targets the TSLP receptor. We believe these characteristics will translate into a differentiated profile, including improved clinical outcomes, substantially extended dosing intervals, and the potential to treat for a broad spectrum of TSLP-driven inflammatory diseases. • Advance verekitug in severe asthma, CRSwNP and COPD.
We are currently conducting two separate multi-national, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 2 clinical trials to investigate the efficacy of two extended dosing intervals of 12 and 24 weeks for patients with severe asthma and 12 weeks for patients with CRSwNP.
We conducted two separate multi-national, placebo-controlled, randomized Phase 2 clinical trials to investigate the efficacy of two extended dosing intervals of 12 and 24 weeks for patients with severe asthma and 12 weeks for patients with CRSwNP.
PRIME designation in the European Union The PRIority MEdicines (“PRIME”), scheme is intended to encourage product development in areas of unmet medical need and provides accelerated assessment of products representing substantial innovation reviewed under the centralized procedure.
PRIME designation in the European Union The PRIority MEdicines (“PRIME”), scheme is intended to encourage product development in areas of unmet medical need and is intended to support development of products representing substantial innovation reviewed under the centralized procedure.