vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Air Products (APD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Air Products is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.1B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.7× Agilent Technologies). Air Products runs the higher net margin — 21.9% vs 17.0%, a 4.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 5.8%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $-350.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs 2.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. provides atmospheric gases, process and specialty gases, equipment, and services worldwide. The company produces atmospheric gases, including oxygen, nitrogen, and argon; process gases, such as hydrogen, helium, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, syngas; specialty gases; and equipment for the production or processing of gases comprising air separation units and non-cryogenic generators for customers in various industries, including refining, chemical, gasificati...
A vs APD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $3.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $678.2M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 32.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 23.7% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 21.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 5.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 9.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $3.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $678.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $713.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $-1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $617.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $696.6M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 32.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 32.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 29.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 31.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 34.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 32.8% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 26.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | -79.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 22.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 76.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 24.7% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 21.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | -59.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 21.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 61.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 23.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $3.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $3.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $-7.77 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $2.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $8.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $3.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $15.4B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $41.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $15.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $14.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $16.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $15.1B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $41.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $41.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $41.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $38.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $40.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $39.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $37.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $900.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $-350.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | -11.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 40.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 1.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $900.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $855.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $328.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $811.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $-350.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-640.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $-1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-345.2M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | -11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -21.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -53.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | -44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -11.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 49.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 64.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 72.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 65.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 53.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 1.33× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.20× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.31× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
APD
| Other | $1.6B | 53% |
| Onsite | $783.9M | 25% |
| Merchant | $557.8M | 18% |
| Saleof Equipment | $117.0M | 4% |