vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Builders FirstSource (BLDR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Builders FirstSource is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.3B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.8× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 2.9%, a 14.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -10.1%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $42.7M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -14.1%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Builders FirstSource, Inc. is a Fortune 500 company that is a manufacturer and supplier of building materials. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas, and is the largest supplier of building products, prefabricated components and value-added services in the US. Builders FirstSource employs over 15,000 people throughout the USA. They serve new residential construction, repair and remodeling professionals. The company was incorporated in March 1998.
A vs BLDR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $3.3B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $96.3M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 28.3% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 0.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 2.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -10.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $4.5B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | $96.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $31.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $185.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $96.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $190.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $284.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $344.1M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | 28.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 30.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 30.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 32.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 32.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 32.8% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 5.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 10.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | $0.27 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $1.10 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $1.66 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.84 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $1.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $2.44 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $2.87 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $98.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $24.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $11.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $98.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $181.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $296.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $115.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $153.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $75.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | $24.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $4.3B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $11.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $11.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $10.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $10.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $10.7B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 1.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 1.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 1.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 1.02× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.86× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $87.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $42.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 1.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 0.91× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $863.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | $87.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $194.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $547.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $341.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $132.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $373.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $730.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $452.1M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | $42.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $106.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $461.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $32.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $273.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $630.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $364.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 8.2% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | 0.91× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 6.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 4.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.84× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.31× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
BLDR
| Windows, doors & millwork | $853.8M | 26% |
| Specialty building products & services | $853.4M | 26% |
| Lumber & lumber sheet goods | $845.4M | 26% |
| Manufactured products | $734.5M | 22% |