vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Chemours Co (CC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.4× Chemours Co). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs -3.5%, a 20.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -2.1%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $92.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
The Chemours Company is an American chemical company that was founded in July 2015 as a spin-off from DuPont. It has its corporate headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, United States. Chemours is the manufacturer of Teflon, the brand name of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), known for its anti-stick properties. It also produces titanium dioxide and refrigerant gases.
A vs CC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $-47.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 11.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | -3.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -2.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -261.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $-0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $-47.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $46.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $-380.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $-13.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $-32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $60.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 17.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 17.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 19.8% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -15.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 4.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 3.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | -23.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 3.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-2.53 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.39 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $670.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $4.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $250.0M |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $7.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 16.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $670.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $613.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $502.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $464.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $713.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $596.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $604.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $250.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $274.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $228.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $566.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $571.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $643.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $714.0M |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $7.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $7.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $7.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $7.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $7.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $7.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 16.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 14.96× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 17.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 7.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 7.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 6.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 5.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $137.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $92.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 6.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 3.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $51.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $137.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $146.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $93.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $-112.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $138.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $139.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $-620.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $92.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-196.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $29.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $63.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-693.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -44.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | -10.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
CC
| Titanium Technologies | $563.0M | 42% |
| Thermal And Specialized Solutions | $443.0M | 33% |
| Advanced Performance Materials | $312.0M | 23% |
| Other Non-Reportable Segment | $12.0M | 1% |
