vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. (CCK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.3B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.8× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 6.3%, a 10.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CROWN HOLDINGS, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 7.0%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $-129.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs 3.5%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Danish Crown is an internationally oriented Danish food company with butchery operations, processing and sales of primarily pork and beef. Through a number of subsidiaries, the group is widely represented within the food industry with various food products. The CEO is Niels Duedahl and the headquarters are located in Randers.
A vs CCK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $3.3B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $206.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 11.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 6.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -9.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $1.56 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | $206.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $150.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $214.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $181.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $193.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $358.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $-175.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $174.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 12.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 12.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 5.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | $1.56 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $1.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $1.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $3.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $-1.47 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $1.45 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $584.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $53.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $3.4B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $14.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $584.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $764.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $936.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $779.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $918.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | $53.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $7.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $7.3B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $2.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $2.5B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | $14.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $14.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $14.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $14.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $13.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $13.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $14.9B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | 0.02× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 1.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 2.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 2.18× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 2.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 2.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 2.92× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $-129.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | -4.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $1.0B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $487.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $580.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $449.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $295.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $554.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $445.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | $-129.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $488.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $393.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-19.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $146.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $478.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $361.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 5.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 11.9% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 3.25× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 2.71× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 0.82× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 2.56× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
CCK
| Americas Beverage | $1.5B | 47% |
| European Beverage | $588.0M | 18% |
| Transit Packaging | $496.0M | 15% |
| Other | $342.0M | 10% |
| Asia Pacific | $303.0M | 9% |