vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. (CQP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.9B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.6× Agilent Technologies). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. runs the higher net margin — 44.2% vs 17.0%, a 27.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (18.3% vs 7.0%). Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($864.0M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.'s revenue compounded faster (12.6% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Total revenue of oil and gas companies is listed in billions of U.S. dollars. Total revenue is usually self-reported by companies, and often reported by neutral, unbiased, reliable publications. Reported data may be subsequently revised or restated due to a wide range of issues such as exchange rates, contract settlements, or mid-year discontinuation of products or services. Fiscal years are for January 1 to December 31, except where noted. Empty cells indicate that no data for that year has ...
A vs CQP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.9B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $1.3B |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 50.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 44.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 18.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 106.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $506.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $553.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $641.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $623.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $635.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $570.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 50.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 29.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 29.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 27.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 33.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 40.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 21.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 22.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 21.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 30.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 30.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $182.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $14.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | — |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $17.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $182.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $121.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $108.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $94.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $270.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $331.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $351.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $14.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $14.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $14.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $14.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $14.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $14.8B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | — |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $16.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $16.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $17.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $17.5B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $887.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $864.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 29.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 0.69× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $2.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $887.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $658.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $558.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $665.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $876.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $691.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $732.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $864.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $610.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $490.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $605.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $827.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $702.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 29.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 20.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 20.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 33.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 37.1% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 0.69× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.01× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.09× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
CQP
| Liquefied Natural Gas | $2.9B | 98% |
| Regasification Service | $34.0M | 1% |
| Other | $17.0M | 1% |
