vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Evergy (EVRG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.4× Evergy). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 6.5%, a 10.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 5.3%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $-530.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs 0.4%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Evergy, Inc. is an American investor-owned utility (IOU) with publicly traded stock with headquarters in Topeka, Kansas, and in Kansas City, Missouri. The company was formed from a merger of Westar Energy of Topeka and Great Plains Energy of Kansas City, parent company of Kansas City Power & Light. Evergy is the largest electric company in Kansas, serving more than 1.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Kansas and Missouri.
A vs EVRG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $84.3M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 18.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 6.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 7.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.35 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $84.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $475.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $171.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $78.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $465.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $207.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 18.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 37.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 35.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 25.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 26.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 26.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 14.7% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $2.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $0.74 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.54 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $0.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $19.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $10.2B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $33.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $19.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $27.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $27.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $35.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $22.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $26.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $10.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $10.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $9.7B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $33.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $33.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $32.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $32.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $32.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $32.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $31.8B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $334.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $-530.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | -41.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 66.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 3.96× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $-751.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $937.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $323.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $449.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $395.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $953.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $317.5M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $-530.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $225.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-303.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-143.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $-118.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $427.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-360.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | -41.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -22.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -11.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | -9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -25.6% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 66.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 40.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 46.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 45.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 41.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 29.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 48.1% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 3.96× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.89× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 3.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 5.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.53× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
EVRG
| Electric Utility Customer Class Residential | $462.9M | 36% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Commercial | $447.6M | 35% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial | $164.1M | 13% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Transmission | $129.4M | 10% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Wholesale | $69.7M | 5% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Other Retail | $12.2M | 1% |
| Electric Utility Customer Class Industrial Steam | $5.7M | 0% |
