vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Fortive (FTV). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.7× Fortive). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 12.8%, a 4.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Fortive posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.7% vs 7.0%). Fortive produced more free cash flow last quarter ($193.8M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -17.0%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Fortive Corporation is an American industrial technology conglomerate company headquartered in Everett, Washington. The company specializes in providing essential technologies for connected workflow solutions; designing, developing, manufacturing and distributing professional and engineered products, software and services. Their products and services are split into three strategic segments; Intelligent Operating Solutions, Precision Technologies, and Advanced Healthcare Solutions. As of Decem...
A vs FTV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $136.4M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 63.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 12.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 7.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 21.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | $136.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $185.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $55.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $166.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $171.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $208.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $221.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $195.1M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | 63.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 63.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 63.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 59.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 59.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 60.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 59.8% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 15.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 19.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 11.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 14.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 12.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | $0.44 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.50 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $0.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $356.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $3.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $6.1B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.57× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $356.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $375.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $430.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $892.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $813.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $811.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $644.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $3.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $6.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $10.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $10.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $10.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $10.5B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | $11.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $11.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $11.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $18.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $17.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $17.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $17.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.37× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.36× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $234.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $193.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 18.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 2.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 1.72× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $935.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | $234.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $311.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $241.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $502.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $459.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $308.9M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | $193.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $313.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $153.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $274.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $215.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $465.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $431.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $279.7M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 28.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 5.83× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 2.99× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.87× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 1.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 2.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.07× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.58× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
FTV
Segment breakdown not available.
