vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Huntington Ingalls Industries is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.5B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.9× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 4.6%, a 12.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Huntington Ingalls Industries posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs 7.0%). Huntington Ingalls Industries produced more free cash flow last quarter ($516.0M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Huntington Ingalls Industries's revenue compounded faster (11.3% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. (HII) is the largest military shipbuilding company in the United States as well as a provider of professional services to partners in government and industry. HII was formed on 31 March 2011, as a divestiture from Northrop Grumman.
A vs HII — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $3.5B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $159.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 4.9% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 4.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 29.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $4.06 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.0B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $159.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $145.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $152.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $149.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $123.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $101.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $173.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 6.3% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 3.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 5.8% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $4.06 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $3.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $3.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $3.79 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $3.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $2.56 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $4.38 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $12.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.53× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $4.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $12.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $12.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $12.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $12.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $11.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $11.3B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.53× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $650.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $516.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 14.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 3.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 4.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $794.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $118.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $823.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $-395.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $391.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $213.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $-9.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $516.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $727.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-462.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $277.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-99.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -16.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -3.3% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 4.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 0.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 5.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | -2.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 3.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.11× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | -0.05× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
HII
| Aircraftcarriers | $984.0M | 28% |
| Fixedpriceincentive | $758.0M | 22% |
| Submarines | $744.0M | 21% |
| Surfacecombatantsandcoastguardcutters | $452.0M | 13% |
| Amphibiousassaultships | $433.0M | 12% |
| Costtype | $123.0M | 4% |
| Otherprograms | $4.0M | 0% |
