vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and MARKEL GROUP INC. (MKL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MARKEL GROUP INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.6B vs $1.8B, roughly 2.0× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 16.1%, a 0.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -6.9%). MARKEL GROUP INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($599.1M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -10.5%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
MARKEL GROUP INC.MKLEarnings & Financial Report
Markel Group Inc. is a group of companies headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, and originally founded in 1930 as an insurance company.
A vs MKL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $3.6B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $576.8M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 22.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 16.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -6.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 5.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $48.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $3.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.7B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $576.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $751.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $657.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $121.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $549.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $267.7M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 22.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 25.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 24.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 7.2% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $48.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $59.25 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $49.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $12.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $39.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $66.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $18.62 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $4.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $4.3B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $18.6B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $68.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.23× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $3.5B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $4.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $4.4B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $18.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $18.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $17.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $17.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $15.9B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $68.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $67.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $66.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $64.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $61.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $62.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $59.7B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.23× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.24× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $662.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $599.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 16.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 1.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $2.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $662.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $504.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $376.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $493.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $890.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $578.6M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $599.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $453.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $335.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $420.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $838.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $521.4M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 16.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 29.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | 9.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 14.1% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 1.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.62× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | 3.09× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 0.98× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 2.16× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
MKL
| Industrial | $1.6B | 45% |
| Consumer And Other | $958.3M | 27% |
| Financial | $737.0M | 21% |
| Other | $198.8M | 6% |
| Corporate Operations | $52.0M | 1% |
| Revenue From Contract With Customer | $10.5M | 0% |
