vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and ON Semiconductor (ON). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $1.6B, roughly 1.2× ON Semiconductor). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 16.4%, a 0.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs -10.0%). ON Semiconductor produced more free cash flow last quarter ($372.4M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -12.3%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. was an American semiconductor company based in San Jose, California. It was founded in 1957 as a division of Fairchild Camera and Instrument by the "traitorous eight" who defected from Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory. It became a pioneer in the manufacturing of transistors and of integrated circuits. Schlumberger bought the firm in 1979 and sold it to National Semiconductor in 1987; Fairchild was spun off as an independent company again in 1997. I...
A vs ON — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.6B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $255.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 17.0% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 16.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | -10.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -32.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.63 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $255.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $-486.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $379.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $401.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $338.2M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 37.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 37.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 45.2% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -39.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 23.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 22.4% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | -33.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 22.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 19.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.63 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $0.88 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.93 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.78 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $2.9B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $3.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $7.9B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $13.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.43× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $3.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $3.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $3.4B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $7.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $8.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $8.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $8.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $8.3B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $13.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $13.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $13.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $13.7B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 0.42× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.38× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.41× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $418.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $372.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 24.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 3.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 1.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $418.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $184.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $602.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $579.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $465.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $362.2M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $372.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $106.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $454.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $434.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $293.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $207.7M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 31.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 12.0% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 3.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 8.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 8.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 1.08× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 1.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
ON
| Industrial Segment | $426.3M | 27% |
| Other End Markets Segment | $337.3M | 22% |
| Intelligent Sensing Segments | $284.0M | 18% |
| Direct Customers | $282.4M | 18% |
| Intelligent Sensing Group | $230.0M | 15% |
