vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Owlet, Inc. (OWLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Agilent Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.8B vs $26.6M, roughly 67.7× Owlet, Inc.). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs -34.6%, a 51.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Owlet, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (29.6% vs 7.0%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $-651.0K). Over the past eight quarters, Owlet, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (34.2% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Owlet, Inc. is a pediatric health technology firm that develops smart wearable monitoring products for infants, most notably its signature smart sock that tracks real-time heart rate, oxygen levels, and sleep metrics. It serves global consumer markets across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, distributing products via direct-to-consumer e-commerce and partnered retail outlets, focused on supporting parental peace of mind and infant health safety.
A vs OWLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $26.6M |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $-9.2M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 47.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | -18.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | -34.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 29.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | -1.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $26.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $26.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $20.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $22.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $20.7M |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $-37.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $-1.1M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 47.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 51.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 53.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 53.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 52.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 49.5% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | -18.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | -12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -36.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | -21.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | -10.8% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | -34.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | -144.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 14.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | -44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | -25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | -5.5% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-2.37 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $-0.61 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $-0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $35.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $19.0M |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $85.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $16.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $21.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $15.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.1M |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $19.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $-54.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $-59.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $-25.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $-29.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $-21.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $-33.4M |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $85.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $74.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $63.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $51.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $49.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $56.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $45.9M |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $-452.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $-651.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | -2.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 0.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $-11.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $-452.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $-3.4M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $-3.4M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | -2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | -8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | -33.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | -16.3% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 0.0% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | -0.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | -1.96× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
OWLT
| US | $22.7M | 85% |
| Non Us | $3.2M | 12% |
| Other | $651.0K | 2% |