vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (REZI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.1× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 7.2%, a 9.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 2.0%). RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($262.0M vs $175.0M). Over the past eight quarters, RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (12.9% CAGR vs 6.9%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Resideo Technologies, Inc. is an American multinational company that was formed in 2018 out of a spin-off from Honeywell. It provides room air temperature, quality, and humidity control and security systems primarily in residential dwellings in the U.S. and internationally. The company operates in two segments: products and distribution. It manufactures and distributes smart-home and software products, including temperature and lighting control, security, and water and air monitoring. The com...
A vs REZI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $136.0M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 29.6% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | 7.4% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 7.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 491.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.99 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $156.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $-825.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $20.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $30.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 29.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 29.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 28.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 28.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 28.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 28.1% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | 8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 9.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | -42.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $0.99 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $-5.59 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $0.19 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $661.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $3.2B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $2.9B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $8.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 1.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $661.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $345.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $753.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $577.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $692.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $413.0M |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $2.0B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $3.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $3.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $3.3B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $8.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $8.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $8.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $8.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $8.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $8.0B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 1.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 1.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 0.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.60× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.61× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | $299.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $262.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | 13.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | 2.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | 2.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $-1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $299.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $200.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $-65.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $203.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $147.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $92.0M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $262.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $-1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $180.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $181.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $125.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $77.0M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | -85.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -5.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 6.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 4.8% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 0.9% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 2.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | -10.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | -10.83× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 8.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 7.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 3.07× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
REZI
| ADI Global Distribution Segment | $1.2B | 62% |
| Safety And Security | $257.0M | 14% |
| Air | $211.0M | 11% |
| Energy Service | $153.0M | 8% |
| Public Utilities Inventory Water | $91.0M | 5% |
