vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Agilent Technologies (A) and Molson Coors Beverage Company (TAP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Molson Coors Beverage Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.7B vs $1.8B, roughly 1.5× Agilent Technologies). Agilent Technologies runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 5.5%, a 11.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Agilent Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (7.0% vs 2.0%). Agilent Technologies produced more free cash flow last quarter ($175.0M vs $-212.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Agilent Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.9% CAGR vs -15.8%).
Agilent Technologies, Inc. provides application focused solutions to the life sciences, diagnostics, and applied chemical markets worldwide. The Life Sciences and Applied Markets segment offers liquid chromatography systems and components; liquid chromatography mass spectrometry systems; gas chromatography systems and components; gas chromatography mass spectrometry systems; inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry instruments; atomic absorption instruments; microwave plasma-atomic emissi...
Molson Coors Beverage Company is a Canadian-American multinational drink and brewing company headquartered in Chicago, Illinois and Montreal, Quebec.
A vs TAP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.8B | $2.7B |
| Net Profit | $305.0M | $150.1M |
| Gross Margin | 52.6% | 33.0% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 5.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.0% | 2.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -4.1% | 25.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.07 | $0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $3.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $3.8B |
| Q1 26 | $305.0M | $150.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $434.0M | $238.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $336.0M | $-2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $215.0M | $428.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $318.0M | $121.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $351.0M | $287.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $282.0M | $199.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $308.0M | $427.0M |
| Q1 26 | 52.6% | 33.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.2% | 31.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.1% | 33.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.5% | 31.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.9% | 32.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.2% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 54.4% | 34.6% |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.8% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.7% | -98.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.0% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.4% | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.1% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.1% | 15.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.3% | 7.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | -84.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.9% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 4.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.6% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.6% | 11.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.07 | $0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.53 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.18 | $-14.79 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.75 | $2.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.11 | $0.59 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.23 | $1.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $0.96 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.05 | $2.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.8B | $382.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.0B | $3.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $6.9B | $10.3B |
| Total Assets | $12.8B | $22.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $1.8B | $382.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $896.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $950.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $613.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $412.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $969.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $3.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $6.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $6.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3B | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $7.0B |
| Q1 26 | $6.9B | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $6.7B | $10.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.1B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.0B | $13.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.9B | $13.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.9B | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.2B | $13.2B |
| Q1 26 | $12.8B | $22.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.7B | $22.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.2B | $26.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.9B | $25.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.8B | $26.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.0B | $26.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.9B | $27.4B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.45× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.53× | 0.61× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.55× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.56× | 0.47× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.57× | 0.47× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.36× | 0.47× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.34× | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $268.0M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $175.0M | $-212.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 9.7% | -7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.88× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $993.0M | $1.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $268.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $545.0M | $540.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $362.0M | $616.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $221.0M | $718.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $431.0M | $-90.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $481.0M | $494.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $452.0M | $521.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $333.0M | $869.2M |
| Q1 26 | $175.0M | $-212.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $452.0M | $357.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.0M | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.0M | $555.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $334.0M | $-328.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $388.0M | $383.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $360.0M | $350.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $230.0M | $691.7M |
| Q1 26 | 9.7% | -7.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.3% | 11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.9% | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.9% | -12.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.8% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.6% | 18.0% |
| Q1 26 | 5.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.0% | 5.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.8% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.8% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 4.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.26× | 2.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.03× | 1.68× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.36× | -0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.37× | 1.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.60× | 2.61× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.08× | 2.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
A
| Service Other | $525.0M | 29% |
| Chemicaland Energy Market | $422.0M | 23% |
| Agilent Cross Lab | $273.0M | 15% |
| Environmentaland Forensics Market | $177.0M | 10% |
| Food Market | $166.0M | 9% |
| Academiaand Government Market | $130.0M | 7% |
| Applied Markets | $98.0M | 5% |
TAP
Segment breakdown not available.
