vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC (AAP) and Wabtec (WAB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Wabtec is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $2.0B, roughly 1.5× ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC). Wabtec runs the higher net margin — 12.3% vs 0.3%, a 12.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (130.1% vs 13.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Wabtec's revenue compounded faster (5.6% CAGR vs -15.7%).
Advance Auto Parts, Inc. is an American automotive aftermarket parts provider. Headquartered in Raleigh, North Carolina, it serves professional installer and do it yourself (DIY) customers.
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, commonly known as Wabtec, is an American company formed by the merger of the Westinghouse Air Brake Company (WABCO) and MotivePower in 1999. It is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
AAP vs WAB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.0B | $3.0B |
| Net Profit | $6.0M | $363.0M |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 17.5% |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | 12.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 130.1% | 13.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 101.4% | 11.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $2.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $2.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $2.6B |
| Q1 26 | $6.0M | $363.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $202.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $310.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.0M | $336.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $322.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-6.0M | $212.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.0M | $283.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.0M | $289.0M |
| Q1 26 | 44.1% | 36.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.3% | 32.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.5% | 34.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.9% | 34.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 42.3% | 30.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.6% | 33.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | 33.1% |
| Q1 26 | 2.2% | 17.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.1% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.1% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 16.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 16.3% |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | 10.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 10.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.10 | $2.12 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.02 | $1.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.25 | $1.81 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.40 | $1.96 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.88 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $1.24 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.75 | $1.63 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $1.64 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.1B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.4B | $4.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $11.1B |
| Total Assets | $11.8B | $23.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.55× | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $464.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $479.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $451.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.4B | $5.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.0B |
| Q1 26 | $2.2B | $11.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $11.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $11.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $10.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $10.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.6B | $10.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $10.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.6B | $10.5B |
| Q1 26 | $11.8B | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.1B | $22.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5B | $21.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.6B | $20.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $19.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.3B | $18.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2B | $18.9B |
| Q1 26 | 1.55× | 0.42× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.55× | 0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.81× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.81× | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.39× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.69× | 0.39× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.69× | 0.39× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | 0.38× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $72.0M | $199.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-21.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -1.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 12.00× | 0.55× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-298.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $72.0M | $199.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-12.0M | $992.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.0M | $367.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-156.0M | $209.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $191.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.0M | $723.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $85.0M | $542.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $235.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-21.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-76.0M | $870.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.0M | $312.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-198.0M | $170.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $147.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $27.0M | $639.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.0M | $496.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-43.0M | $189.0M |
| Q1 26 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.1% | 10.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -7.7% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.6% | 7.1% |
| Q1 26 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 4.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.6% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.9% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | 12.00× | 0.55× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.91× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.33× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.50× | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.07× | 0.81× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
