vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) and AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Assets Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($110.6M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.1× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). American Assets Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -55.2%, a 61.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.5% vs 1.8%). Over the past eight quarters, American Assets Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Personal Assets Trust is a large British investment trust. The company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The chairman is Iain Ferguson CBE.
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
AAT vs AP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $110.6M | $104.4M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $-57.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | -54.0% |
| Net Margin | 6.1% | -55.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | 11.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -16.3% | -1958.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $-2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $110.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $110.1M | $104.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.6M | $103.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.9M | $108.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.6M | $99.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.5M | $93.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.8M | $92.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.9M | $107.1M |
| Q1 26 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-57.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $-7.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.5M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $2.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.1% | -54.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -55.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | -6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | $-2.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.70 | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $118.3M | $10.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $117.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $32.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $495.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.61× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $118.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.4M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.9M | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $425.7M | $15.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $533.0M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.9M | $7.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $117.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $119.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $115.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $115.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $116.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $119.4M |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $32.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $62.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $64.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $58.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $61.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $58.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | $495.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $524.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $537.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $536.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $530.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $547.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $560.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.48× | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.78× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.72× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.89× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-64.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -0.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.5% | 2.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-8.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.1M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.5M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $-2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $207.1M | $7.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.3M | $-5.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.9M | $-64.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.1M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.6M | $-8.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 86.2% | -0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.1% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.3% | -3.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.8% | -7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 120.7% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | 9.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.3% | -7.5% |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.6% | 2.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.9% | 4.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | -4.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.98× | -2.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAT
| Rental income | $104.4M | 94% |
| Other | $6.2M | 6% |
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
