vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
American Assets Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($110.6M vs $57.8M, roughly 1.9× Nano Dimension Ltd.). American Assets Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -171.1%, a 177.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Personal Assets Trust is a large British investment trust. The company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The chairman is Iain Ferguson CBE.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
AAT vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $110.6M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | 6.1% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -16.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $110.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $110.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.5M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.9M | $28.4M |
| Q1 26 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $-79.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.3% | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.6% | 45.8% |
| Q1 26 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | -279.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | $-0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $118.3M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $118.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $425.7M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $533.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.9M | $231.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $870.3M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $911.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.5% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $207.1M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.3M | $-30.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.9M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 86.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 120.7% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.98× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAT
| Rental income | $104.4M | 94% |
| Other | $6.2M | 6% |
NNDM
Segment breakdown not available.
