vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of American Assets Trust, Inc. (AAT) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $110.6M, roughly 1.2× American Assets Trust, Inc.). American Assets Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -40.6%, a 46.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, American Assets Trust, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.8% vs -2.2%). Over the past eight quarters, American Assets Trust, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-0.1% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Personal Assets Trust is a large British investment trust. The company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The chairman is Iain Ferguson CBE.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
AAT vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $110.6M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $6.7M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 23.4% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 6.1% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.8% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -16.3% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.08 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $110.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $110.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.6M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $107.9M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $108.6M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $113.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $122.8M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $110.9M | $138.0M |
| Q1 26 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.5M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.5M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.7M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.9M | $-25.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 59.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 60.5% | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.6% | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.0% | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 65.5% | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.6% | 43.8% |
| Q1 26 | 23.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 21.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.6% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.3% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.8% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | -18.9% |
| Q1 26 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | -18.6% |
| Q1 26 | $0.08 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.07 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.70 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.20 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $118.3M | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $118.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $129.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $138.7M | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $143.7M | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $143.9M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $425.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $533.0M | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.9M | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $850.5M |
| Q1 26 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0B | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.72× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 14.5% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $167.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.5M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $36.9M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $207.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.4M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.3M | $-2.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $94.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.4M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $43.6M | $-4.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 86.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 21.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.3% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 120.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.8% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.3% | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.9% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.1% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.15× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.98× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AAT
| Rental income | $104.4M | 94% |
| Other | $6.2M | 6% |
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
