vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and Arcellx, Inc. (ACLX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Arcellx, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.1M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.7× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co runs the higher net margin — -195.0% vs -766.0%, a 571.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -79.3%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Arcellx, Inc. is a clinical-stage biotechnology company that develops innovative chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies for treating hard-to-treat cancers including hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. Its core pipeline targets unmet oncology medical needs, serving global patient populations and partnering with life sciences stakeholders.
ABAT vs ACLX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $8.1M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-62.3M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -847.6% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -766.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -79.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | -765.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $8.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $27.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $39.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-62.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-47.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-25.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-27.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -847.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -348.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -129.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -127.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -40.3% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -766.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -308.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -99.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -99.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-1.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.51 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $543.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $416.9M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $648.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $543.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $587.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $574.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $516.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $573.9M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $416.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $454.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $483.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $487.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $496.6M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $648.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $711.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $764.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $734.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $779.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-63.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-63.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -786.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-122.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-63.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-46.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-36.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-31.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-63.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-47.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-39.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-38.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -786.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -311.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 109.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -144.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -97.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.4% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
