vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and Sphere 3D Corp. (ANY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $2.7M, roughly 1.7× Sphere 3D Corp.). On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs 3.1%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Sphere 3D Corp is a global technology company specializing in cloud computing, data management, and virtualization solutions. It delivers enterprise-grade products and services tailored for small to medium-sized businesses, large enterprise clients, and public sector entities, focusing on optimizing IT infrastructure efficiency and cutting operational costs for end users.
ABAT vs ANY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $2.7M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -372.7% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | 3.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-6.96 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-8.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $104.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.5M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.0% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | -372.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | -153.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -87.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -184.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -328.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -218.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -122.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -26.9% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | -162.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | 55.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -311.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -64.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-6.96 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.62 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.27 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $3.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $23.3M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $25.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $5.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $9.3M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $32.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $30.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $27.5M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $34.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $44.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $42.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-16.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-23.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -867.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 275.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-40.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-16.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $290.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-58.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | $-23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -867.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -218.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -200.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -181.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -511.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -184.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 275.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 86.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 338.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 196.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -3.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.55× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
