vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and BIOHARVEST SCIENCES INC. (BHST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
BIOHARVEST SCIENCES INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.4M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.8× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
BioHarvest Sciences Inc. is a biotechnology firm that develops and produces sustainable, high-purity plant-derived bioactive ingredients. It serves the nutraceutical, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical sectors, leveraging proprietary cell cultivation technology to create efficacious natural products without large-scale agricultural farming.
ABAT vs BHST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $8.4M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | — |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | — |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $7.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | 60.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | 58.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | — |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
