vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC (CCEL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($7.8M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.6× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). CRYO CELL INTERNATIONAL INC runs the higher net margin — -48.7% vs -195.0%, a 146.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -2.3%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Cryo-Cell International, Inc. is a cord blood bank. It was founded by Dan Richard in 1989. Cryo-Cell International is the first private cord blood bank to separate and store stem cells. Cryo-Cell is headquartered outside of Tampa, in Oldsmar, Florida. In January 1997, the Company's stock began trading on the NASDAQ Small Cap market under symbol CCEL.
ABAT vs CCEL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $7.8M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | 77.9% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -50.6% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -48.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | -105.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $7.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $8.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $749.4K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $355.8K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $282.9K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $655.8K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $556.2K |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | 77.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | 77.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | 76.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | 75.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 78.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 74.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 73.7% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | -50.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | 18.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.5% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | -48.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | 3.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -23.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.09 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $0.03 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $3.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $8.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $-18.6M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $61.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $979.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $8.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $8.6M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $-14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $-14.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.3M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $63.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $64.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $64.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $64.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $62.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $62.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $61.7M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $1.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $5.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $707.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $954.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-356.9K |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $644.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $892.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-814.6K |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 31.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.38× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.99× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.64× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
