vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and ConocoPhillips (COP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ConocoPhillips is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.4B vs $4.8M, roughly 2392.3× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). ConocoPhillips runs the higher net margin — 12.7% vs -195.0%, a 207.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -10.7%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
ConocoPhillips Company is an American multinational corporation engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and production. It is based in the Energy Corridor district of Houston, Texas.
ABAT vs COP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 2026 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $11.4B |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $1.4B |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | 19.7% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | 12.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -10.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | -37.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $1.18 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $12.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $14.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.4K | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $202.0K | $11.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.3B |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.4M | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-11.7M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6B |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | 54.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | 56.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | 59.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | 57.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -894.4% | 60.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1159.0% | 59.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 61.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 56.7% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | 22.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4151.4% | 23.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4854.0% | 27.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 30.9% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | 12.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | 15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4031.0% | 18.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -5790.5% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $1.18 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $1.38 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $1.56 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $2.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.18 | $1.92 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $1.76 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.98 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.15 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $7.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $22.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $64.5B |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $121.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.35× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $7.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $6.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $5.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $7.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6M | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | $22.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $23.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $23.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $23.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $17.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.3B |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $64.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $64.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $65.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $65.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.6M | $64.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.3M | $49.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $49.3B |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $121.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $122.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $122.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $124.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $88.3M | $122.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $73.8M | $96.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $96.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $95.3B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.36× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.35× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 2.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $5.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $6.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.3M | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.6M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.80× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.11× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABAT
Segment breakdown not available.
COP
| Natural Gas Reserves | $2.1B | 18% |
| Physical Gas Contracts | $2.0B | 18% |
| Europe Middle East And North Africa Segment | $1.6B | 14% |
| Natural Gas Product Line | $1.5B | 13% |
| Canada Operating Segment | $1.3B | 12% |
| Alaska Segment | $1.3B | 11% |
| Natural Gas Liquids Reserves | $826.0M | 7% |
| Asia Pacific Operating Segment | $360.0M | 3% |
| Crude Oil Product Line | $236.0M | 2% |
| Related Party | $12.0M | 0% |
| Corporate Segment | $7.0M | 0% |
