vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and EyePoint, Inc. (EYPT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EyePoint, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.3M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.1× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co runs the higher net margin — -195.0% vs -1114.3%, a 919.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -43.7%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
EyePoint Pharmaceuticals Inc. is a Watertown, Massachusetts company specialising in the application of microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) and nanotechnology to drug delivery.
ABAT vs EYPT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $5.3M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-59.4M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -1166.8% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -1114.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -43.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | -92.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.85 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $24.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-59.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-45.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-29.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-30.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.3M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 93.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 85.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 93.5% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -1166.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -199.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -390.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -311.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -364.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -285.2% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -1114.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -184.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -357.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -279.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -325.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -250.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.54 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.58 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $255.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $246.0M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $301.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $255.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $318.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $370.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $280.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $299.3M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $246.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $298.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $336.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $218.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $228.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $249.9M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $301.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $362.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $418.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $300.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $324.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $329.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-62.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-63.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1196.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 22.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-194.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-62.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-53.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-35.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-20.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-31.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-63.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-36.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-21.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-32.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1196.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -218.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -312.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -385.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -222.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -277.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.2% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
