vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Magyar Bancorp, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.9M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.9× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). Magyar Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs -195.0%, a 230.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs 19.0%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Magyar Bank is a bank based in New Brunswick, New Jersey with branches in Central Jersey.
ABAT vs MGYR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $8.9M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $3.1M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | 48.3% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | 35.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | 19.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $7.5M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $7.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | 48.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 30.0% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 23.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 21.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.30 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $0.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $34.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $49.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $121.7M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $34.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $51.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $49.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $121.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $109.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $107.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $106.5M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $944.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $928.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $916.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $3.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 41.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.17× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $8.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $553.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $428.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 39.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 1.95× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
