vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NBY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.0× NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.). NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -25.5% vs -195.0%, a 169.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs 126.1%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is an Emeryville, California based clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company, focused on products for eye care. Major products include Avenova, cleared by FDA for lid and lash cleansing as part of a regimen for Blepharitis. and NeutroPhase, used in treatment of Necrotizing Fasciitis
ABAT vs NBY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $4.8M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-1.2M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | 65.2% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -37.2% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -25.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | 126.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 70.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 65.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 66.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 68.2% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -37.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -67.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -87.1% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -25.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -66.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -122.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.92 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.37 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-29.95 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $430.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $-129.0K |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $3.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $430.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $776.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $751.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-129.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-617.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $160.0K |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -35.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -75.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABAT
Segment breakdown not available.
NBY
| Other | $2.4M | 51% |
| Total Product Revenue | $2.3M | 49% |
