vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and NEXGEL, INC. (NXGL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $2.8M, roughly 1.7× NEXGEL, INC.). NEXGEL, INC. runs the higher net margin — -34.7% vs -195.0%, a 160.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -8.1%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
NEXGEL, INC. is a specialty consumer healthcare and medical technology firm that develops, manufactures and distributes ultra-gentle, irritation-free hydrogel products. Its offerings span over-the-counter skincare remedies, wound care solutions, and topical drug delivery platforms, serving consumer, clinical and pharmaceutical partner segments primarily across North America, with growing global distribution channels.
ABAT vs NXGL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $2.8M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-970.0K |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | 29.3% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -43.4% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -34.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -8.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | -14.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $-970.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $-653.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-665.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-712.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-850.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-693.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-885.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-853.0K |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | 29.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | 42.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | 42.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | -43.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | -24.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -26.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -73.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -68.8% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | -34.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | -22.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -23.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -25.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -27.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -61.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -67.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $588.0K |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $4.5M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $10.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.13× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $938.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $588.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $614.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $638.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $662.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $685.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $709.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $732.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $750.0K |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $4.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.8M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $10.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $9.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $9.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $10.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $281.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $281.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-785.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-407.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-400.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-859.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-700.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-793.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-909.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -27.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -41.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -63.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -98.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.0% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.