vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and QUICKLOGIC Corp (QUIK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
QUICKLOGIC Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.7M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.2× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). QUICKLOGIC Corp runs the higher net margin — -5.4% vs -195.0%, a 189.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -24.1%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
QuickLogic Corp is a fabless semiconductor company developing low-power customizable FPGAs, embedded FPGA IP, and edge sensor processing solutions. Its offerings serve global wearables, IoT, mobile electronics, and industrial markets, enabling energy-efficient low-latency on-device processing for edge AI and sensing use cases.
ABAT vs QUIK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $5.7M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-305.0K |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | 62.7% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -5.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -24.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | -114.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-305.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $108.0K |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 62.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 59.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 54.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.1% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -38.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -29.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -5.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -49.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -37.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.01 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $3.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $24.9M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $51.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.12× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $24.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $22.2M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $49.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $47.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.06× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $116.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-1.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -20.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 22.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-5.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $116.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-16.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-220.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $147.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-83.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $62.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -20.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -102.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 96.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.36× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABAT
Segment breakdown not available.
QUIK
| North America | $3.0M | 53% |
| Other | $2.7M | 47% |
