vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and High Roller Technologies, Inc. (ROLR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
High Roller Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.3M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.3× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). High Roller Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 58.4% vs -195.0%, a 253.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -16.4%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
S&S – Sansei Technologies is an American company known for its pneumatically powered amusement rides and roller coaster designing.
ABAT vs ROLR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $6.3M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $3.7M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | 1.3% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | 58.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -16.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 831.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.39 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $7.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-592.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-501.0K |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -7.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -47.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.3% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | 58.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -8.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -6.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $2.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $6.6M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $16.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $3.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-779.0K |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $12.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.9M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-78.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-90.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.02× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-78.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-840.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-90.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-845.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -12.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -53.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABAT
Segment breakdown not available.
ROLR
| Net Gaming Revenue | $4.9M | 77% |
| Net Revenue Noncore Services | $1.4M | 23% |
