vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and Satellogic Inc. (SATL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Satellogic Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.2M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.3× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). Satellogic Inc. runs the higher net margin — 488.0% vs -195.0%, a 682.9% gap on every dollar of revenue.
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Satellogic Inc. is an American company specializing in Earth-observation satellites, founded in 2010 by Emiliano Kargieman and Gerardo Richarte.
ABAT vs SATL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $6.2M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $30.5M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -114.2% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | 488.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $4.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-6.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-32.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-18.1M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | -114.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | -222.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -141.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -280.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -419.2% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | 488.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | 109.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -149.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -961.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -517.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.20 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $94.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $60.5M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $151.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $94.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $32.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $25.6M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $60.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $-68.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $-83.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.1M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $151.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $70.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $61.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $76.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-9.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -204.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 53.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.31× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-34.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -204.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -267.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -115.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -195.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 53.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 17.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 56.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.31× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABAT
Segment breakdown not available.
SATL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $5.7M | 91% |
| Other | $547.0K | 9% |
