vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc (SPCE). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($4.8M vs $4.2M, roughly 1.1× Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc). AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co runs the higher net margin — -195.0% vs -2222.2%, a 2027.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs 125.5%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Virgin Galactic Holdings, Inc. is a British-American spaceflight company founded by Richard Branson and the Virgin Group conglomerate, which retains an 11.9% stake through Virgin Investments Limited.
ABAT vs SPCE — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $4.2M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-93.8M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | -546.6% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -2412.1% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -2222.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | 125.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 30.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-4.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $2.8M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-93.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-102.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-104.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-104.6M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -546.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1038.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -766.4% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -1384.3% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2412.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5599.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -4067.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -6613.0% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2222.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5139.1% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -3701.8% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -6053.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-4.36 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-5.10 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-14.49 | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-5.57 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $775.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $394.8M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $775.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $765.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $874.0M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $997.1M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $394.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $417.6M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $505.5M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $599.4M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $1.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $-79.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-113.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -2690.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 815.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-458.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-79.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-113.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-95.3M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-91.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-113.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-126.3M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-113.7M | ||
| Q3 23 | — | $-104.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2690.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -6362.8% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -4046.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | -6066.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 815.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 658.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 653.9% | ||
| Q3 23 | — | 771.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
