vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co (ABAT) and Xos, Inc. (XOS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Xos, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.2M vs $4.8M, roughly 1.1× AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co). Xos, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -186.8% vs -195.0%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1331.8% vs -54.5%).
American Battery Technology Company, formerly American Battery Metals Corporation, is a US-based battery recycling technology startup founded in 2011. It employs a hydrometallurgical process to recycle batteries and a targeted extraction system to extract raw materials from primary resources.
Xos, Inc. is an American manufacturer of commercial electric vehicles (EVs) and mobile EV chargers.
ABAT vs XOS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $4.8M | $5.2M |
| Net Profit | $-9.3M | $-9.8M |
| Gross Margin | -33.6% | -50.5% |
| Operating Margin | -207.5% | -186.6% |
| Net Margin | -195.0% | -186.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 1331.8% | -54.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 30.7% | 48.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $4.8M | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $937.6K | $16.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8M | $18.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $980.0K | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $15.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-9.3M | $-9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.3M | $2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-10.2M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $-10.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-19.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-10.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-9.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | -33.6% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -375.1% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -92.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -274.5% | 20.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 22.1% |
| Q4 25 | -207.5% | -186.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1080.8% | -42.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -280.1% | -38.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1086.3% | -157.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -127.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -61.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -73.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -81.1% |
| Q4 25 | -195.0% | -186.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1098.5% | 12.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -366.4% | -40.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1173.1% | -173.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -165.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -66.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -62.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -87.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.09 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.09 | $-0.91 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-1.26 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.34 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.80 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $47.9M | $14.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $119.0M | $23.3M |
| Total Assets | $123.3M | $60.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $47.9M | $14.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.9M | $14.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.5M | $8.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $19.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $46.2M |
| Q4 25 | $119.0M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.0M | $31.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.6M | $18.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $65.6M | $24.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $33.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $50.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $59.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $67.8M |
| Q4 25 | $123.3M | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $101.5M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.5M | $80.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $76.5M | $87.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $98.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $120.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $123.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $135.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-9.8M | $2.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-9.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.3M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-26.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-14.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -73.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -168.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -115.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.