vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbbVie (ABBV) and Amphenol (APH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AbbVie is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.0B vs $7.6B, roughly 2.0× Amphenol). Amphenol runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 4.6%, a 7.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Amphenol posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (58.4% vs 9.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (45.3% CAGR vs 1.8%).
AbbVie Inc. is an American pharmaceutical company headquartered in North Chicago, Illinois. They have produced drugs to treat a wide range of medical issues.
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
ABBV vs APH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.0B | $7.6B |
| Net Profit | $697.0M | $943.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.7% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | 24.0% |
| Net Margin | 4.6% | 12.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.9% | 58.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -46.0% | 26.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.39 | $0.72 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $15.0B | $7.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $16.6B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.8B | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4B | $5.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.3B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $14.5B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.5B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | $697.0M | $943.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $186.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $938.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $737.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-22.0M | $746.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $604.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $524.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 72.6% | 38.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 66.4% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.8% | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 70.0% | 34.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 70.9% | 34.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 70.9% | 33.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 70.9% | 33.6% |
| Q1 26 | 26.6% | 24.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.3% | 26.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.1% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | 25.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.0% | 21.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -9.9% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.5% | 20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.6% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | 4.6% | 12.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.9% | 18.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.1% | 19.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.1% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | 15.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 14.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.39 | $0.72 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.02 | $0.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $0.97 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.52 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.72 | $0.58 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.88 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $0.41 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.6B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $18.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $14.1B |
| Total Assets | — | $42.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.33× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $11.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.5B | $3.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.6B | $3.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2B | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | $18.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $58.9B | $14.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.0B | $7.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.5B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.3B | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $58.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0B | $5.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.3B | $13.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6B | $12.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $-183.0M | $11.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $10.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | $9.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.8B | $9.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $42.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.0B | $36.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $133.9B | $27.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $137.2B | $25.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.2B | $22.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $135.2B | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $143.4B | $19.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $141.9B | $18.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.62× | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.44× | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.15× | 0.66× | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.70× | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.56× | 0.56× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $831.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $4.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.0B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.2B | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $764.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.0B | $847.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4B | $704.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $664.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $831.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $576.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $647.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.2B | $474.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $522.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | 22.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.1% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.7% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.9% | 11.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | 14.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.8% | 3.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.9% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 3.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.87× | 1.44× | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.76× | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.49× | 1.30× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.27× | 1.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.49× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.66× | 1.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABBV
Segment breakdown not available.
APH
| Communications Solutions | $4.5B | 60% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions | $1.7B | 22% |
| Interconnect and Sensor Systems | $1.4B | 18% |
