vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. (BIOX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($77.6M vs $44.9M, roughly 1.7× AbCellera Biologics Inc.). Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp. runs the higher net margin — -9.6% vs -19.9%, a 10.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AbCellera Biologics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (788.4% vs -16.8%). Over the past eight quarters, AbCellera Biologics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (112.3% CAGR vs -8.4%).
AbCellera Biologics Inc. is a Vancouver, British Columbia-based biotechnology company that discovers and develops antibody therapeutics. The company is best known for its leading role in the Pandemic Prevention Platform, a project of DARPA's Biological Technologies Office. AbCellera utilizes a proprietary technology platform, which they claim can develop "medical countermeasures within 60 days." Its platform for single-cell screening was initially developed at the University of British Columbia.
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp is a global agricultural technology firm that develops and commercializes sustainable crop solutions including drought-tolerant seed traits, biofertilizers, and biopesticides. It serves farmers across South America, North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific, focusing on raising crop yields while reducing the environmental footprint of agricultural activities.
ABCL vs BIOX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.9M | $77.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.9M | $-7.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 46.8% |
| Operating Margin | -63.7% | 9.3% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -9.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 788.4% | -16.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.9% | -20.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.12 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $60.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $93.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $84.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-57.1M | $-7.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.6M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $605.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.1M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.6M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 46.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 42.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 40.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.8% |
| Q4 25 | -63.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -851.8% | 9.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -290.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1479.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1439.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1276.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -551.5% | 15.7% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.8% | -9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1077.2% | -2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -785.4% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -408.0% | 11.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.14 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.5M | $15.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $966.9M | $288.3M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $734.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.2M | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $38.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $29.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.6M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.6M | $16.4M |
| Q4 25 | $966.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $964.0M | $288.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $345.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $346.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $346.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $348.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $734.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $798.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $835.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $827.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $836.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.7M | $14.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-44.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -99.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-174.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $14.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $23.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-108.6M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.9M | $5.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.7M | $-17.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-44.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-45.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-47.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-65.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -99.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -687.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -267.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -524.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3702.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -728.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -683.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -661.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 251.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1552.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 284.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 274.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 242.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.85× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.78× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
