vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and GOLD RESOURCE CORP (GORO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
GOLD RESOURCE CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($51.3M vs $44.9M, roughly 1.1× AbCellera Biologics Inc.). GOLD RESOURCE CORP runs the higher net margin — 35.1% vs -19.9%, a 55.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AbCellera Biologics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (788.4% vs 295.5%). GOLD RESOURCE CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($15.3M vs $-44.6M). Over the past eight quarters, AbCellera Biologics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (112.3% CAGR vs 65.6%).
AbCellera Biologics Inc. is a Vancouver, British Columbia-based biotechnology company that discovers and develops antibody therapeutics. The company is best known for its leading role in the Pandemic Prevention Platform, a project of DARPA's Biological Technologies Office. AbCellera utilizes a proprietary technology platform, which they claim can develop "medical countermeasures within 60 days." Its platform for single-cell screening was initially developed at the University of British Columbia.
Gold Springs Resource Corp is a Canadian company that is pursuing the development of the Gold Springs gold-silver mine on the border of Utah and Nevada in the United States. Headquartered in Vancouver, the company is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange in Canada and the OTCQX market exchange in the US. The company was founded in 2006 as the South American Silver Corporation, an equity carve-out of the General Minerals Corporation, to pursue exploration and development of the Malku Khota and ...
ABCL vs GORO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.9M | $51.3M |
| Net Profit | $-8.9M | $18.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | 51.5% |
| Operating Margin | -63.7% | 38.9% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | 35.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 788.4% | 295.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.9% | 261.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $0.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | $51.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $24.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $13.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $13.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $20.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $18.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | $18.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-57.1M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.7M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.6M | $-8.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.1M | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.9M | $-27.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.6M | $-5.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -39.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -65.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -17.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -11.6% |
| Q4 25 | -63.7% | 38.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -851.8% | -14.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -290.2% | -102.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1479.6% | -63.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -96.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1439.4% | -122.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1276.2% | -52.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -551.5% | -40.4% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | 35.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.8% | -18.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.3% | -102.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1077.2% | -67.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -85.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -785.4% | -95.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.3% | -129.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -408.0% | -30.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | $0.14 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.5M | $25.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $966.9M | $44.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $184.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.5M | $25.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $12.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.6M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.3M | $5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.6M | $5.7M |
| Q4 25 | $966.9M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $964.0M | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $19.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $24.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $27.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $37.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $49.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $74.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $184.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $155.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $147.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $145.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $154.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $161.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $182.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.7M | $24.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-44.6M | $15.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -99.4% | 29.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.9% | 17.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-174.1M | $644.0K |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.7M | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $-325.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $-828.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-108.6M | $1.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.9M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.0M | $-63.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.7M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-44.6M | $15.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.5M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-45.8M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.2M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.0M | $58.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-47.4M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-50.1M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-65.8M | $-512.0K |
| Q4 25 | -99.4% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -687.0% | -31.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -267.9% | -34.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -524.0% | -24.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3702.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -728.4% | -43.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -683.8% | -10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -661.5% | -2.7% |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | 17.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.7% | 30.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.2% | 22.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 251.1% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1552.7% | 9.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 284.6% | 17.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 274.6% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 242.5% | 10.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
