vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($57.8M vs $44.9M, roughly 1.3× AbCellera Biologics Inc.). AbCellera Biologics Inc. runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -171.1%, a 151.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. Nano Dimension Ltd. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-21.1M vs $-44.6M).
AbCellera Biologics Inc. is a Vancouver, British Columbia-based biotechnology company that discovers and develops antibody therapeutics. The company is best known for its leading role in the Pandemic Prevention Platform, a project of DARPA's Biological Technologies Office. AbCellera utilizes a proprietary technology platform, which they claim can develop "medical countermeasures within 60 days." Its platform for single-cell screening was initially developed at the University of British Columbia.
Nano Dimension Ltd. is a leading provider of additively manufactured electronics solutions and 3D printing technologies. It designs high-precision 3D printers, related materials, and software for producing printed circuit boards, microelectronics components, and multi-layer electronic devices, serving aerospace, defense, medical, automotive, and industrial electronics segments across global markets.
ABCL vs NNDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2024
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.9M | $57.8M |
| Net Profit | $-8.9M | $-98.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 43.1% |
| Operating Margin | -63.7% | -155.1% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -171.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 788.4% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | $-0.45 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $57.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $28.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-57.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-98.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.9M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -63.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -851.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -290.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1479.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -155.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1439.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1276.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -551.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -1077.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -171.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -785.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.3% | -279.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -408.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.5M | $317.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $966.9M | $860.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $902.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $317.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.3M | $231.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $966.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $964.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $860.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $870.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $902.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $911.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.7M | $-18.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-44.6M | $-21.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -99.4% | -36.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.9% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-174.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-108.6M | $-18.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.0M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-44.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-45.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.0M | $-21.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-47.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-65.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -99.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -687.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -267.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -524.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3702.8% | -36.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -728.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -683.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -661.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 251.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1552.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 284.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 274.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 242.5% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
