vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and Snail, Inc. (SNAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AbCellera Biologics Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($44.9M vs $25.1M, roughly 1.8× Snail, Inc.). Snail, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -19.9%, a 16.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AbCellera Biologics Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (788.4% vs -4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, AbCellera Biologics Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (112.3% CAGR vs 33.4%).
AbCellera Biologics Inc. is a Vancouver, British Columbia-based biotechnology company that discovers and develops antibody therapeutics. The company is best known for its leading role in the Pandemic Prevention Platform, a project of DARPA's Biological Technologies Office. AbCellera utilizes a proprietary technology platform, which they claim can develop "medical countermeasures within 60 days." Its platform for single-cell screening was initially developed at the University of British Columbia.
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
ABCL vs SNAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $44.9M | $25.1M |
| Net Profit | $-8.9M | $-862.2K |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | -63.7% | -6.0% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 788.4% | -4.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 73.9% | -177.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.03 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $44.9M | $25.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.1M | $22.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $20.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0M | $26.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5M | $22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.0M | $14.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | $-862.2K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-57.1M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-34.7M | $-16.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-45.6M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-51.1M | $235.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-36.9M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.6M | $-1.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 31.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 37.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | -63.7% | -6.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -851.8% | -71.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -290.2% | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1479.6% | -20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1439.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1276.2% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -551.5% | -15.6% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -637.8% | -56.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -203.3% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1077.2% | -9.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -785.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -504.3% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -408.0% | -12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.44 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.17 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.13 | $0.06 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-0.05 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $128.5M | $8.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $14.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $966.9M | $-16.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $59.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $128.5M | $8.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $83.2M | $12.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $159.3M | $9.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $156.3M | $7.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.6M | $10.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.3M | $15.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.6M | $16.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $9.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $6.5M |
| Q4 25 | $966.9M | $-16.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $964.0M | $-15.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $9.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $9.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $5.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $59.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $64.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $62.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $66.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $75.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $78.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.99× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.73× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-34.7M | $-5.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-44.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -99.4% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 21.9% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-174.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-34.7M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $6.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-32.4M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $764.5K | ||
| Q4 24 | $-108.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.9M | $-5.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-30.0M | $206.6K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-41.7M | $6.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-44.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-45.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-187.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-47.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-50.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-65.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -99.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -687.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -267.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -524.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3702.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -728.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -683.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -661.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 99.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 78.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 251.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1552.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 284.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 274.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 242.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -21.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABCL
Segment breakdown not available.
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
