vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Abbott Laboratories (ABT) and LEAR CORP (LEA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Abbott Laboratories is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.5B vs $5.8B, roughly 2.0× LEAR CORP). Abbott Laboratories runs the higher net margin — 15.5% vs 3.0%, a 12.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, LEAR CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.7% vs 4.4%). Abbott Laboratories produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.6B vs $-26.5M). Over the past eight quarters, Abbott Laboratories's revenue compounded faster (7.2% CAGR vs -1.6%).
Abbott Laboratories, commonly known as Abbott, is an American multinational medical devices and health care company with headquarters in Abbott Park, Illinois. The company produces pharmaceuticals for sale outside the United States, diagnostic products, nutritional products, and medical devices.
Lear Corporation is an American company that manufactures automotive seating and electrical systems. In 2019, it ranked #147 and in 2018, it ranked #148 on the Fortune 500 list.
ABT vs LEA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.5B | $5.8B |
| Net Profit | $1.8B | $172.3M |
| Gross Margin | 57.0% | 7.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.6% | — |
| Net Margin | 15.5% | 3.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.4% | 4.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -80.8% | 113.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.01 | $3.34 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8B | ||
| Q4 25 | $11.5B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.4B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1B | $6.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.0B | $5.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.4B | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $172.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8B | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $165.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $80.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.2B | $88.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $135.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $173.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.0% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 55.4% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 56.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 56.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 55.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.6% | 7.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.6% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 4.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 84.1% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 2.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $3.34 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.01 | $1.58 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.94 | $2.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.01 | $3.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.76 | $1.49 | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.26 | $1.64 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.94 | $2.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.74 | $3.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9B | $881.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $12.9B | $2.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $52.1B | $5.3B |
| Total Assets | $86.7B | $15.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.25× | 0.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $881.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.7B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.3B | $887.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $779.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.8B | $763.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $950.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.9B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $14.1B | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $5.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $52.1B | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.6B | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $48.8B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.7B | $4.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.8B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.3B | $4.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.7B | $14.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.2B | $15.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.0B | $15.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.4B | $14.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.4B | $14.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $74.4B | $14.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.0B | $14.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.25× | 0.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.54× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.30× | 0.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.3B | $98.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.6B | $-26.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.9% | -0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.0% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.87× | 0.57× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $7.4B | $732.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $98.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $475.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $444.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $296.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $-127.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $680.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $182.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $291.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-26.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | $281.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $307.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $170.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $933.0M | $-231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $488.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $50.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $170.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | -0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.2% | 5.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 8.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.5% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 2.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.87× | 5.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.70× | 4.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.15× | 1.79× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.07× | -1.58× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.31× | 7.73× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.64× | 1.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.51× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ABT
Segment breakdown not available.
LEA
| Seating | $4.4B | 76% |
| E-Systems | $1.4B | 24% |
