vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Arbutus Biopharma Corp (ABUS) and CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. (COSO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($21.3M vs $10.7M, roughly 2.0× Arbutus Biopharma Corp). CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 31.7% vs 23.5%, a 8.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Arbutus Biopharma Corporation is a publicly traded Canadian biopharmaceutical company with an expertise in liposomal drug delivery and RNA interference, and is developing drugs for hepatitis B infection.
CoastalSouth Bancshares, Inc. is a U.S.-based regional bank holding company. It provides a full range of personal and commercial banking services including deposit accounts, consumer loans, mortgages, commercial financing and wealth management solutions for retail customers and small-to-medium enterprises across the U.S. Gulf Coast region.
ABUS vs COSO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $10.7M | $21.3M |
| Net Profit | $2.5M | $6.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 41.2% |
| Net Margin | 23.5% | 31.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 522.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 112.7% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.01 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $21.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.7M | $19.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $4.7M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $6.7M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $6.2M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $6.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-20.1M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-17.1M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-16.3M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-21.9M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-17.6M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | -967.2% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -462.8% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -395.3% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -260.4% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -361.3% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -299.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 31.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.5% | 30.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -431.6% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -367.5% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -244.3% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -351.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -295.1% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.54 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 23 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-0.12 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-0.12 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.4M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $0 | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $83.0M | $250.4M |
| Total Assets | $103.3M | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.4M | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $126.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $17.5M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $27.2M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $40.6M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $146.9M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $24.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $0 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $0 | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $250.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $83.0M | $209.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | $106.0M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $119.3M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $134.7M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $143.9M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $136.9M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $145.5M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $103.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 23 | $144.4M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $158.6M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $176.8M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $191.2M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $195.4M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $203.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 0.00× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-15.7M | $-5.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-5.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -27.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 1.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -6.24× | -0.82× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.7M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q4 23 | $-17.3M | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-21.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-19.6M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-27.3M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-18.7M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-17.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | $-21.8M | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-20.4M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-27.4M | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-17.1M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-18.8M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -27.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -90.3% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | -468.4% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -439.0% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | -410.0% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -274.2% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -315.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 23 | 0.7% | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 18.5% | — | ||
| Q1 23 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 22 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 1.5% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.24× | -2.82× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — | ||
| Q3 23 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
