vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AURORA CANNABIS INC (ACB) and Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. (ENLT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($109.5M vs $81.6M, roughly 1.3× AURORA CANNABIS INC).
Aurora Cannabis Inc. is a Canadian licensed cannabis producer, headquartered in Edmonton. It trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange and Nasdaq as ACB. As of September 2018, Aurora Cannabis had eight licensed production facilities, five sales licences, and operations in 25 countries. It had a funded capacity of over 625,000 kilograms of cannabis production per annum with the bulk of capacity based in Canada and a growing presence in international markets, particularly Denmark and Latin America. ...
Enlight Renewable Energy is a publicly traded company, headquartered in Israel, that builds and operates solar and wind power facilities. Its shares are traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and on Nasdaq (ENLT) following the company’s United States initial public offering in February 2023. In addition to solar and wind, Enlight develops utility-scale energy storage and agrivoltaic projects integrating agricultural land use with photovoltaic generation.
ACB vs ENLT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2024 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $81.6M | $109.5M |
| Net Profit | $-617.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | 8.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | -73.7% | 60.1% |
| Net Margin | -756.4% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $123305879.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $109.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $84.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $90.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $52.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $81.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-617.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 48.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 55.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | 8.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 47.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 58.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 73.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 63.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 55.0% | ||
| Q2 23 | -73.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -756.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $123305879.00 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $125866004.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $122889909.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125866004.00 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $125873060.00 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $117820495.00 | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -10.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $255.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-4.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | $-8.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | -10.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | 5.3% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACB
Segment breakdown not available.
ENLT
| Segment adjusted EBITDA | $99.7M | 91% |
| Tax benefits | $10.1M | 9% |
