vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of AURORA CANNABIS INC (ACB) and Sila Realty Trust, Inc. (SILA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

AURORA CANNABIS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($81.6M vs $50.1M, roughly 1.6× Sila Realty Trust, Inc.). Sila Realty Trust, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.0% vs -756.4%, a 766.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.

Aurora Cannabis Inc. is a Canadian licensed cannabis producer, headquartered in Edmonton. It trades on the Toronto Stock Exchange and Nasdaq as ACB. As of September 2018, Aurora Cannabis had eight licensed production facilities, five sales licences, and operations in 25 countries. It had a funded capacity of over 625,000 kilograms of cannabis production per annum with the bulk of capacity based in Canada and a growing presence in international markets, particularly Denmark and Latin America. ...

Sila Realty Trust, Inc. is a U.S.-based real estate investment trust that owns, operates, and acquires high-quality income-generating commercial properties. Its core portfolio covers industrial logistics facilities, office assets and mixed-use properties, serving tenants across logistics, corporate and retail segments to deliver stable long-term returns.

ACB vs SILA — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ACB
ACB
1.6× larger
ACB
$81.6M
$50.1M
SILA
Higher net margin
SILA
SILA
766.4% more per $
SILA
10.0%
-756.4%
ACB

Income Statement — Q1 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Revenue
$81.6M
$50.1M
Net Profit
$-617.0M
$5.0M
Gross Margin
8.7%
88.9%
Operating Margin
-73.7%
Net Margin
-756.4%
10.0%
Revenue YoY
7.6%
Net Profit YoY
-54.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.10

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
$50.1M
Q3 25
$49.8M
Q2 25
$48.7M
Q1 25
$48.3M
Q4 24
$46.5M
Q3 24
$46.1M
Q2 24
$43.6M
Q1 24
$50.6M
Net Profit
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
$5.0M
Q3 25
$11.6M
Q2 25
$8.6M
Q1 25
$7.9M
Q4 24
$11.1M
Q3 24
$11.9M
Q2 24
$4.6M
Q1 24
$15.0M
Gross Margin
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
88.9%
Q3 25
88.1%
Q2 25
87.7%
Q1 25
86.9%
Q4 24
87.3%
Q3 24
87.4%
Q2 24
86.6%
Q1 24
89.0%
Net Margin
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
10.0%
Q3 25
23.3%
Q2 25
17.6%
Q1 25
16.4%
Q4 24
23.9%
Q3 24
25.9%
Q2 24
10.6%
Q1 24
29.6%
EPS (diluted)
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
$0.10
Q3 25
$0.21
Q2 25
$0.15
Q1 25
$0.14
Q4 24
$0.20
Q3 24
$0.21
Q2 24
$0.08
Q1 24
$0.26

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$32.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.3B
Total Assets
$2.1B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
$32.3M
Q3 25
$27.7M
Q2 25
$24.8M
Q1 25
$30.5M
Q4 24
$39.8M
Q3 24
$28.6M
Q2 24
$87.0M
Q1 24
$90.2M
Stockholders' Equity
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
$1.3B
Q3 25
$1.3B
Q2 25
$1.4B
Q1 25
$1.4B
Q4 24
$1.4B
Q3 24
$1.4B
Q2 24
$1.5B
Q1 24
$1.5B
Total Assets
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
$2.1B
Q3 25
$2.1B
Q2 25
$2.0B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$2.0B
Q3 24
$2.0B
Q2 24
$2.1B
Q1 24
$2.1B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-4.3M
$119.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-8.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-10.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
5.3%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
23.76×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
$119.1M
Q3 25
$30.0M
Q2 25
$31.9M
Q1 25
$24.1M
Q4 24
$132.8M
Q3 24
$29.1M
Q2 24
$31.6M
Q1 24
$36.6M
Cash Conversion
ACB
ACB
SILA
SILA
Q4 25
23.76×
Q3 25
2.59×
Q2 25
3.71×
Q1 25
3.06×
Q4 24
11.95×
Q3 24
2.43×
Q2 24
6.84×
Q1 24
2.44×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Related Comparisons