vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) and Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. (RHP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($664.6M vs $341.4M, roughly 1.9× Accel Entertainment, Inc.). Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.4% vs 4.7%, a 5.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.2% vs 7.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Accel Entertainment, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs 4.1%).

Legendary Entertainment, LLC is an American mass media and film production company based in Burbank, California, founded by Thomas Tull in 2000. The company has often collaborated with the major studios, including Warner Bros. Pictures, Universal Pictures, Sony Pictures and Paramount Pictures, as well as streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu.

Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is a hotel, resort, entertainment, and media company named for one of its assets: the Ryman Auditorium, a National Historic Landmark in Nashville, Tennessee. The company's legal lineage can be traced back to its time as a subsidiary of Edward Gaylord's Oklahoma Publishing Company; however, the backbone of the modern entity was formed with the company's acquisition of WSM, Inc. in 1983. This purchase resulted in the ownership of the Grand Ole Opry and associa...

ACEL vs RHP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
RHP
RHP
1.9× larger
RHP
$664.6M
$341.4M
ACEL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
RHP
RHP
+5.6% gap
RHP
13.2%
7.5%
ACEL
Higher net margin
RHP
RHP
5.7% more per $
RHP
10.4%
4.7%
ACEL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ACEL
ACEL
Annualised
ACEL
6.4%
4.1%
RHP

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Revenue
$341.4M
$664.6M
Net Profit
$16.2M
$69.4M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
8.7%
20.7%
Net Margin
4.7%
10.4%
Revenue YoY
7.5%
13.2%
Net Profit YoY
93.3%
10.1%
EPS (diluted)
$0.19
$1.03

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
$664.6M
Q4 25
$341.4M
$737.8M
Q3 25
$329.7M
$592.5M
Q2 25
$335.9M
$659.5M
Q1 25
$323.9M
$587.3M
Q4 24
$317.5M
$647.6M
Q3 24
$302.2M
$550.0M
Q2 24
$309.4M
$613.3M
Net Profit
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
$69.4M
Q4 25
$16.2M
$74.5M
Q3 25
$13.4M
$34.9M
Q2 25
$7.3M
$71.8M
Q1 25
$14.6M
$63.0M
Q4 24
$8.4M
$72.3M
Q3 24
$4.9M
$59.0M
Q2 24
$14.6M
$100.8M
Gross Margin
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
41.4%
Q3 25
40.9%
Q2 25
49.7%
Q1 25
44.4%
Q4 24
40.4%
Q3 24
43.1%
Q2 24
48.4%
Operating Margin
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
20.7%
Q4 25
8.7%
19.4%
Q3 25
7.7%
15.0%
Q2 25
8.0%
21.1%
Q1 25
8.0%
19.8%
Q4 24
6.5%
18.6%
Q3 24
7.2%
19.3%
Q2 24
7.3%
27.4%
Net Margin
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
10.4%
Q4 25
4.7%
10.1%
Q3 25
4.1%
5.9%
Q2 25
2.2%
10.9%
Q1 25
4.5%
10.7%
Q4 24
2.6%
11.2%
Q3 24
1.6%
10.7%
Q2 24
4.7%
16.4%
EPS (diluted)
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
$1.03
Q4 25
$0.19
$1.12
Q3 25
$0.16
$0.53
Q2 25
$0.08
$1.12
Q1 25
$0.17
$1.00
Q4 24
$0.09
$1.12
Q3 24
$0.06
$0.94
Q2 24
$0.17
$1.65

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$296.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$607.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$269.7M
$770.8M
Total Assets
$1.1B
$6.2B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.25×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$296.6M
$471.4M
Q3 25
$290.2M
$483.3M
Q2 25
$264.6M
$420.6M
Q1 25
$271.9M
$413.9M
Q4 24
$281.3M
$477.7M
Q3 24
$265.1M
$534.9M
Q2 24
$254.9M
$498.4M
Total Debt
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$607.4M
Q3 25
$595.4M
Q2 25
$595.5M
Q1 25
$580.7M
Q4 24
$595.4M
Q3 24
$554.1M
Q2 24
$565.7M
Stockholders' Equity
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
$770.8M
Q4 25
$269.7M
$750.2M
Q3 25
$267.1M
$758.5M
Q2 25
$260.5M
$800.4M
Q1 25
$259.1M
$531.5M
Q4 24
$255.0M
$549.0M
Q3 24
$206.7M
$551.9M
Q2 24
$209.1M
$562.6M
Total Assets
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
$6.2B
Q4 25
$1.1B
$6.2B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$6.2B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$6.1B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$5.2B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$5.2B
Q3 24
$950.2M
$5.2B
Q2 24
$950.3M
$5.1B
Debt / Equity
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
2.25×
Q3 25
2.23×
Q2 25
2.29×
Q1 25
2.24×
Q4 24
2.33×
Q3 24
2.68×
Q2 24
2.71×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$31.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$16.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
4.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.92×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$62.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$31.1M
$164.7M
Q3 25
$55.2M
$205.2M
Q2 25
$19.8M
$122.5M
Q1 25
$44.8M
$98.2M
Q4 24
$13.5M
$166.6M
Q3 24
$50.1M
$218.1M
Q2 24
$28.9M
$184.3M
Free Cash Flow
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$16.0M
$58.5M
Q3 25
$34.2M
$135.4M
Q2 25
$-6.2M
$53.0M
Q1 25
$18.0M
$-14.5M
Q4 24
$2.1M
$76.0M
Q3 24
$33.1M
$85.7M
Q2 24
$11.4M
$78.8M
FCF Margin
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.7%
7.9%
Q3 25
10.4%
22.9%
Q2 25
-1.9%
8.0%
Q1 25
5.6%
-2.5%
Q4 24
0.7%
11.7%
Q3 24
11.0%
15.6%
Q2 24
3.7%
12.9%
Capex Intensity
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
4.4%
14.4%
Q3 25
6.4%
11.8%
Q2 25
7.8%
10.5%
Q1 25
8.3%
19.2%
Q4 24
3.6%
14.0%
Q3 24
5.6%
24.1%
Q2 24
5.7%
17.2%
Cash Conversion
ACEL
ACEL
RHP
RHP
Q1 26
Q4 25
1.92×
2.21×
Q3 25
4.13×
5.88×
Q2 25
2.71×
1.71×
Q1 25
3.06×
1.56×
Q4 24
1.62×
2.30×
Q3 24
10.23×
3.70×
Q2 24
1.98×
1.83×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ACEL
ACEL

Video Gaming$319.1M93%
ATM Fees And Other Revenue$13.5M4%
Amusement$5.3M2%
Manufacturing$3.6M1%

RHP
RHP

Food and beverage$289.3M44%
Rooms$223.8M34%
Entertainment$79.2M12%
Other$72.3M11%

Related Comparisons