vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Accel Entertainment, Inc. (ACEL) and Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp (ZWS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($407.2M vs $341.4M, roughly 1.2× Accel Entertainment, Inc.). Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp runs the higher net margin — 10.3% vs 4.7%, a 5.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.8% vs 7.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Accel Entertainment, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (6.4% CAGR vs 4.4%).

Legendary Entertainment, LLC is an American mass media and film production company based in Burbank, California, founded by Thomas Tull in 2000. The company has often collaborated with the major studios, including Warner Bros. Pictures, Universal Pictures, Sony Pictures and Paramount Pictures, as well as streaming services such as Netflix and Hulu.

Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp designs, manufactures, and distributes a wide range of water management and dispensing products, including commercial plumbing fixtures, drinking fountains, water filtration systems, and flow control components. It serves commercial, residential, industrial, and public infrastructure markets primarily across North America, with a focus on delivering sustainable, water-efficient solutions for diverse end-user needs.

ACEL vs ZWS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
ZWS
ZWS
1.2× larger
ZWS
$407.2M
$341.4M
ACEL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
ZWS
ZWS
+2.3% gap
ZWS
9.8%
7.5%
ACEL
Higher net margin
ZWS
ZWS
5.6% more per $
ZWS
10.3%
4.7%
ACEL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
ACEL
ACEL
Annualised
ACEL
6.4%
4.4%
ZWS

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Revenue
$341.4M
$407.2M
Net Profit
$16.2M
$42.1M
Gross Margin
44.4%
Operating Margin
8.7%
14.8%
Net Margin
4.7%
10.3%
Revenue YoY
7.5%
9.8%
Net Profit YoY
93.3%
15.7%
EPS (diluted)
$0.19
$0.24

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$341.4M
$407.2M
Q3 25
$329.7M
$455.4M
Q2 25
$335.9M
$444.5M
Q1 25
$323.9M
$388.8M
Q4 24
$317.5M
$370.7M
Q3 24
$302.2M
$410.0M
Q2 24
$309.4M
$412.0M
Q1 24
$301.8M
$373.8M
Net Profit
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$16.2M
$42.1M
Q3 25
$13.4M
$61.8M
Q2 25
$7.3M
$50.5M
Q1 25
$14.6M
$43.6M
Q4 24
$8.4M
$36.4M
Q3 24
$4.9M
$43.5M
Q2 24
$14.6M
$46.0M
Q1 24
$7.4M
$34.3M
Gross Margin
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
44.4%
Q3 25
44.1%
Q2 25
45.5%
Q1 25
46.6%
Q4 24
43.5%
Q3 24
46.2%
Q2 24
45.2%
Q1 24
45.5%
Operating Margin
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
8.7%
14.8%
Q3 25
7.7%
17.0%
Q2 25
8.0%
17.5%
Q1 25
8.0%
16.3%
Q4 24
6.5%
13.3%
Q3 24
7.2%
17.1%
Q2 24
7.3%
17.5%
Q1 24
8.5%
14.2%
Net Margin
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
4.7%
10.3%
Q3 25
4.1%
13.6%
Q2 25
2.2%
11.4%
Q1 25
4.5%
11.2%
Q4 24
2.6%
9.8%
Q3 24
1.6%
10.6%
Q2 24
4.7%
11.2%
Q1 24
2.5%
9.2%
EPS (diluted)
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$0.19
$0.24
Q3 25
$0.16
$0.36
Q2 25
$0.08
$0.29
Q1 25
$0.17
$0.26
Q4 24
$0.09
$0.21
Q3 24
$0.06
$0.25
Q2 24
$0.17
$0.27
Q1 24
$0.09
$0.19

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$296.6M
$300.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$607.4M
$496.5M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$269.7M
$1.6B
Total Assets
$1.1B
$2.7B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
2.25×
0.31×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$296.6M
$300.5M
Q3 25
$290.2M
$260.1M
Q2 25
$264.6M
$201.9M
Q1 25
$271.9M
$144.7M
Q4 24
$281.3M
$198.0M
Q3 24
$265.1M
$187.9M
Q2 24
$254.9M
$162.7M
Q1 24
$253.9M
$157.1M
Total Debt
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$607.4M
$496.5M
Q3 25
$595.4M
$496.4M
Q2 25
$595.5M
$495.9M
Q1 25
$580.7M
$495.8M
Q4 24
$595.4M
$495.6M
Q3 24
$554.1M
$495.6M
Q2 24
$565.7M
$495.5M
Q1 24
$539.9M
$495.4M
Stockholders' Equity
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$269.7M
$1.6B
Q3 25
$267.1M
$1.6B
Q2 25
$260.5M
$1.6B
Q1 25
$259.1M
$1.5B
Q4 24
$255.0M
$1.6B
Q3 24
$206.7M
$1.6B
Q2 24
$209.1M
$1.6B
Q1 24
$202.1M
$1.6B
Total Assets
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$1.1B
$2.7B
Q3 25
$1.1B
$2.7B
Q2 25
$1.1B
$2.7B
Q1 25
$1.0B
$2.6B
Q4 24
$1.0B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$950.2M
$2.7B
Q2 24
$950.3M
$2.7B
Q1 24
$919.1M
$2.7B
Debt / Equity
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
2.25×
0.31×
Q3 25
2.23×
0.31×
Q2 25
2.29×
0.32×
Q1 25
2.24×
0.32×
Q4 24
2.33×
0.31×
Q3 24
2.68×
0.31×
Q2 24
2.71×
0.31×
Q1 24
2.67×
0.31×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$31.1M
$91.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$16.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
4.7%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
4.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.92×
2.18×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$62.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$31.1M
$91.7M
Q3 25
$55.2M
$101.3M
Q2 25
$19.8M
$110.6M
Q1 25
$44.8M
$42.9M
Q4 24
$13.5M
$63.6M
Q3 24
$50.1M
$90.9M
Q2 24
$28.9M
$85.1M
Q1 24
$28.8M
$53.9M
Free Cash Flow
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
$16.0M
Q3 25
$34.2M
Q2 25
$-6.2M
Q1 25
$18.0M
Q4 24
$2.1M
Q3 24
$33.1M
Q2 24
$11.4M
Q1 24
$8.1M
FCF Margin
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
4.7%
Q3 25
10.4%
Q2 25
-1.9%
Q1 25
5.6%
Q4 24
0.7%
Q3 24
11.0%
Q2 24
3.7%
Q1 24
2.7%
Capex Intensity
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
4.4%
Q3 25
6.4%
Q2 25
7.8%
Q1 25
8.3%
Q4 24
3.6%
Q3 24
5.6%
Q2 24
5.7%
Q1 24
6.8%
Cash Conversion
ACEL
ACEL
ZWS
ZWS
Q4 25
1.92×
2.18×
Q3 25
4.13×
1.64×
Q2 25
2.71×
2.19×
Q1 25
3.06×
0.98×
Q4 24
1.62×
1.75×
Q3 24
10.23×
2.09×
Q2 24
1.98×
1.85×
Q1 24
3.88×
1.57×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ACEL
ACEL

Video Gaming$319.1M93%
ATM Fees And Other Revenue$13.5M4%
Amusement$5.3M2%
Manufacturing$3.6M1%

ZWS
ZWS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons