vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ACORN ENERGY, INC. (ACFN) and NUSCALE POWER Corp (SMR), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ACORN ENERGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.4M vs $1.8M, roughly 1.3× NUSCALE POWER Corp). ACORN ENERGY, INC. runs the higher net margin — 45.2% vs -2811.3%, a 2856.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ACORN ENERGY, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-32.6% vs -94.7%). Over the past eight quarters, NUSCALE POWER Corp's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs 5.6%).
Acorn Energy Inc. is a NASDAQ-listed conglomerate investing in electricity generation and security. It was founded by George Morgenstern in 1984 as Decision Systems, Inc. and was taken public by Laidlaw Securities. The name was later changed to Data Systems and Software Inc. John Moore became CEO in 2006 and changed the name to Acorn Factor and later to Acorn Energy.
NuScale Power Corporation is a publicly traded American company that designs and markets small modular reactors (SMRs). It is headquartered in Tigard, Oregon. The company's VOYGR power plant, which uses 50 MWe modules and scales to 12 modules, was the first SMR to be certified by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) (2022). The newer 77 MWe module designs, known as the VOYGR-4 and VOYGR-6, were submitted for NRC review on January 1, 2023, and approved May 29, 2025. NuScale is now seekin...
ACFN vs SMR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.4M | $1.8M |
| Net Profit | $1.1M | $-50.8M |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | -3.4% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | -4022.2% |
| Net Margin | 45.2% | -2811.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -32.6% | -94.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -79.5% | 32.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $-0.08 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.4M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.5M | $8.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.1M | $13.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5M | $34.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0M | $475.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $967.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $1.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1M | $-50.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $252.0K | $-273.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $720.0K | $-17.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $464.0K | $-14.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2M | $-75.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $725.0K | $-17.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.0K | $-27.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $65.0K | $-16.6M |
| Q4 25 | 80.1% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.5% | 32.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 74.9% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 75.1% | 52.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 72.4% | 91.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 71.7% | 37.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.2% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 74.6% | 46.7% |
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | -4022.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -6532.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 26.9% | -534.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.5% | -264.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | -34.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.8% | -8635.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | -4330.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.7% | -3188.8% |
| Q4 25 | 45.2% | -2811.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 10.2% | -3316.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | -219.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.0% | -104.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 148.3% | -219.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.8% | -3675.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | -2855.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | -1201.7% |
| Q4 25 | $0.42 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.10 | $-1.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.28 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.19 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.08 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | $-0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.03 | $-0.21 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.5M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.3M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $13.3M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $4.5M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2M | $691.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3M | $420.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6M | $521.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.3M | $441.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2M | $156.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5M | $130.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4M | $132.0M |
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.2M | $828.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.9M | $692.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.1M | $704.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $618.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $288.0K | $160.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-451.0K | $136.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-733.0K | $125.1M |
| Q4 25 | $13.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.4M | $883.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $606.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.1M | $618.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.6M | $544.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.4M | $253.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8M | $229.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.9M | $229.8M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $295.0K | $-203.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 0.27× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $295.0K | $-203.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $895.0K | $-199.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $629.0K | $-33.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $271.0K | $-22.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.0K | $-26.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $698.0K | $-12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $84.0K | $-36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-43.0K | $-33.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-199.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-22.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-26.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2425.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -170.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -77.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.0% |
| Q4 25 | 0.27× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.55× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.58× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.03× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.66× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
