vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC (ACLS) and Automatic Data Processing (ADP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Automatic Data Processing is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.4B vs $238.3M, roughly 22.5× AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC). Automatic Data Processing runs the higher net margin — 19.8% vs 14.4%, a 5.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Automatic Data Processing posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.2% vs -5.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Automatic Data Processing's revenue compounded faster (1.0% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. is an American company engaging in the design, manufacture, and servicing of capital equipment for the semiconductor manufacturing industry worldwide. It produces ion implantation systems, including high and medium current implanters, and high energy implanters, and curing systems used in the fabrication of semiconductor chips. The company was incorporated in 1995 and is headquartered in Beverly, Massachusetts, United States.
Automatic Data Processing, Inc. (ADP) is an American multinational provider of cloud-based human resources management, payroll processing, and professional employer organization (PEO) services, headquartered in Roseland, New Jersey.
ACLS vs ADP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q2 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $238.3M | $5.4B |
| Net Profit | $34.3M | $1.1B |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 46.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 25.8% |
| Net Margin | 14.4% | 19.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.6% | 6.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.3% | 10.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $238.3M | $5.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.6M | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.5M | $5.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.6M | $5.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $252.4M | $5.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.6M | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.5M | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $252.4M | $5.3B |
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $910.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.6M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $963.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $956.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $829.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | 47.0% | 46.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.6% | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | 45.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | 47.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.0% | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.9% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | 44.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.0% | 47.3% |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 25.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | 25.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 23.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | 29.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 25.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | 22.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.4% | 29.4% |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | 17.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | 22.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | 19.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | 22.6% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $2.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $2.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.88 | $3.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.54 | $2.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.49 | $2.34 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.55 | $2.01 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.57 | $2.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $374.3M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $6.4B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $84.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $374.3M | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.6M | $7.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $549.8M | $7.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $587.1M | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.3M | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $579.4M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.3M | $3.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $530.2M | $3.3B |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $975.6M | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $934.9M | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $901.7M | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $84.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $54.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $53.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $56.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $64.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $49.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $54.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $64.2B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.6M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.19× | 1.07× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $107.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.4M | $642.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.7M | $824.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.2M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.19× | 1.07× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | 0.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.27× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.39× | 1.22× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.26× | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | 0.86× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | 1.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.82× | 1.26× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACLS
| Products | $224.6M | 94% |
| Services | $13.7M | 6% |
ADP
| HCM | $2.2B | 42% |
| PEO Zero Margin Benefits Pass Throughs | $1.1B | 21% |
| HRO | $979.3M | 18% |
| Global | $709.3M | 13% |
| Interest On Funds Held For Clients | $308.6M | 6% |
