vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC (ACLS) and ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP (EVC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($238.3M vs $134.4M, roughly 1.8× ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP). AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.4% vs -13.5%, a 27.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.6% vs -5.6%). ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $-8.9M). Over the past eight quarters, ENTRAVISION COMMUNICATIONS CORP's revenue compounded faster (31.1% CAGR vs -2.8%).
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. is an American company engaging in the design, manufacture, and servicing of capital equipment for the semiconductor manufacturing industry worldwide. It produces ion implantation systems, including high and medium current implanters, and high energy implanters, and curing systems used in the fabrication of semiconductor chips. The company was incorporated in 1995 and is headquartered in Beverly, Massachusetts, United States.
Entravision Communications Corporation is an American media company based in Santa Monica, California. Entravision primarily caters to the Spanish-speaking Hispanic and Latino community and owns television and radio stations and outdoor media, in several of the top Hispanic and Latino markets. It is the largest affiliate group of the Univision and UniMás television networks. Entravision also owns a small number of English-language television and radio stations.
ACLS vs EVC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $238.3M | $134.4M |
| Net Profit | $34.3M | $-18.2M |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 54.1% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | -15.4% |
| Net Margin | 14.4% | -13.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.6% | 25.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.3% | 67.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $-0.19 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $238.3M | $134.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.6M | $120.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.5M | $100.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.6M | $91.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $252.4M | $107.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.6M | $97.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.5M | $82.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $252.4M | $78.2M |
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $-9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.6M | $-48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $-56.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $-12.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $-31.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $-48.9M |
| Q4 25 | 47.0% | 54.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.6% | 57.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | 62.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | 63.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.0% | 73.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.9% | 72.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | 70.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.0% | 71.0% |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | -15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | -7.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | -57.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | -45.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | 7.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | -4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.4% | -9.8% |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | -8.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | -52.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | -52.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | -12.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | -38.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | -62.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $-0.19 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.88 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.54 | $-0.63 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.49 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.55 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.57 | $-0.55 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $374.3M | $63.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $167.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $55.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $387.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.02× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $374.3M | $63.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.6M | $66.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $549.8M | $69.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $587.1M | $78.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.3M | $100.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $579.4M | $93.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.3M | $88.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $530.2M | $102.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $167.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $187.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $55.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $78.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $90.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $95.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $146.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $975.6M | $207.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $934.9M | $220.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $901.7M | $173.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $387.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $414.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $418.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $435.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $487.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $557.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $569.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $805.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.6M | $9.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.9M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.7% | 6.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $107.0M | $3.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.6M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.4M | $8.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.7M | $7.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.7M | $10.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $17.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.2M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.3M | $7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.8M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | $10.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.8M | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.1M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.6M | $30.6M |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | 5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | -19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | 39.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | -0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACLS
| Products | $224.6M | 94% |
| Services | $13.7M | 6% |
EVC
| Digital Advertising | $98.1M | 73% |
| Broadcast Advertising | $27.4M | 20% |
| Retransmission Consent | $6.3M | 5% |
| Other Product Or Services | $1.3M | 1% |
