vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC (ACLS) and Fossil Group, Inc. (FOSL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Fossil Group, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.2M vs $238.3M, roughly 1.1× AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC). AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.4% vs -14.8%, a 29.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.6% vs -21.1%). AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-8.9M vs $-22.5M). Over the past eight quarters, AXCELIS TECHNOLOGIES INC's revenue compounded faster (-2.8% CAGR vs -11.4%).
Axcelis Technologies, Inc. is an American company engaging in the design, manufacture, and servicing of capital equipment for the semiconductor manufacturing industry worldwide. It produces ion implantation systems, including high and medium current implanters, and high energy implanters, and curing systems used in the fabrication of semiconductor chips. The company was incorporated in 1995 and is headquartered in Beverly, Massachusetts, United States.
Fossil Group, Inc., is an American fashion design and manufacturer founded in 1984 by Tom Kartsotis and based in Richardson, Texas. Their brands include Fossil, Relic, Michele Watch, Skagen Denmark, WSI, and Zodiac Watches. Fossil also makes licensed accessories for brands such as BMW, Puma, Emporio Armani, Michael Kors, DKNY, Diesel, Kate Spade New York, Tory Burch, Chaps, and Armani Exchange.
ACLS vs FOSL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $238.3M | $270.2M |
| Net Profit | $34.3M | $-40.0M |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 49.0% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | -8.0% |
| Net Margin | 14.4% | -14.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.6% | -21.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -31.3% | -257.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.11 | $-0.76 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $238.3M | $270.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $213.6M | $220.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $194.5M | $233.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $192.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $252.4M | $342.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $256.6M | $287.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.5M | $260.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $252.4M | $254.9M |
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $-40.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $-17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.0M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | $-31.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.9M | $-38.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $51.6M | $-24.3M |
| Q4 25 | 47.0% | 49.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.6% | 57.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.9% | 61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.0% | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.9% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | 52.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 46.0% | 52.4% |
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.7% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | -4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.3% | -8.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | -13.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.4% | -11.5% |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | -14.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.1% | -7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.8% | -3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.9% | -11.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | -14.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | -9.5% |
| Q4 25 | $1.11 | $-0.76 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.83 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.98 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.88 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.54 | $-0.15 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.49 | $-0.60 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.55 | $-0.73 | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.57 | $-0.46 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $374.3M | $79.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $169.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $112.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $701.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.50× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $374.3M | $79.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $449.6M | $109.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $549.8M | $78.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $587.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $571.3M | $123.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $579.4M | $106.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $548.3M | $104.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $530.2M | $112.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $169.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $165.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $167.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $173.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $156.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $202.9M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $112.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.0B | $150.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $140.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $148.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $975.6M | $164.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $934.9M | $189.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $901.7M | $229.1M |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $701.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $704.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $686.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $763.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $812.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $785.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $891.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.10× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.09× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-6.6M | $-22.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-8.9M | $-22.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.7% | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.0% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -0.19× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $107.0M | $-46.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-6.6M | $-22.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.4M | $9.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.7M | $-60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.8M | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.7M | $-22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.1M | $38.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.2M | $622.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-8.9M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $43.3M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.7M | $-60.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | $28.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.8M | $-24.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.1M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $40.6M | $-1.1M |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.3% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | -26.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.2% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | -8.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | 14.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.1% | -0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.7% |
| Q4 25 | -0.19× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.75× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.39× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.79× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.82× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ACLS
| Products | $224.6M | 94% |
| Services | $13.7M | 6% |
FOSL
| Transferred At Point In Time | $109.7M | 41% |
| Traditional Watches | $91.3M | 34% |
| Other | $50.8M | 19% |
| Leathers | $9.5M | 4% |
| Jewelry | $4.0M | 1% |
| Smartwatches | $3.3M | 1% |
| Products Other | $1.6M | 1% |
